Obama continues his War on Oil (and as a result on jobs and the economy as well!)

Obama Sets Drilling Limits, Continues War On Oil
Enemy Of Oil: President
Obama has said that his administration has an all-of-the-above energy
plan. Apparently "all" doesn't include offshore drilling. No president
has ever offered fewer offshore leases.
The Congressional Research Service reports that the Obama administration is offering 15 offshore drilling leases in a new plan.
Even Jimmy Carter, America's first green president, had a better
record. He offered 36 leases to be sold in response to the 1978
amendments to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
If not for Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act that
requires the Interior Department to submit energy plans to Congress that
include proposed public lease sales in U.S. waters, it's safe to say
that the Obama administration likely would be offering zero offshore
leases.
As it is, it appears it is doing just enough to comply with the law, and no more.
Perhaps worse than offering a paltry number of leases, this
administration has canceled previous lease offers and conducted only 11
of the 21 sales that were scheduled by the Bush administration for
2007-12.
This White House has even been found in contempt for refusing a
judge's order to lift an illegal moratorium it had placed on offshore
drilling.
When gas prices were soaring, Obama thought it clever to point out
that oil output has increased on his watch. Unlike many of his other
claims, this was true.
But
the increase has been from development on private property, not public
lands rich in energy resources. It's not an increase he can take credit
for. It's an increase that occurred in spite of his policies.
Though he misused data for his political advantage, it would be a
mistake to peg Obama as a friend of oil. It would be more accurate to
say that he sees crude and the rest of the fossil fuels that power our
economy as enemies that have to be eliminated.
After all, this is the president who: as a candidate promised
policies that would bankrupt any company that had plans to start a
coal-fired power plant; blocked while in office the Keystone XL
pipeline; and threatened on Monday to veto a bill that requires the
federal government to expand its offshore leases.
He is the nation's chief executive who hired an energy secretary —
Steven Chu — who demanded in 2008 that "Somehow, we have to figure out
how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe," which are
roughly $9 a gallon in many countries.
And he also employs an interior secretary — Ken Salazar — who said he
would still oppose offshore drilling even if gasoline hit $10 a gallon
in the U.S. The same Ken Salazar is known, as well, for saying
Washington needed to keep its boot on the throat of BP as the company
was capping the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Then-press secretary Robert Gibbs gleefully indicated that Salazar's
comment was not a wildcat statement but a position supported by the
administration.
Obama's war on oil plays well among his voting bloc. But it is more
than hostility toward oil — it's also an assault on jobs and economic
growth.
It doesn't have to go on, though. Voters can end it in November.
Comment:Obama's "energy" policies may play well with his "green" bloc of
voters but I'm pretty sure the rank and file members of the unions that
support him aren't too happy with a policy that kills, quite literally,
over 100,000 jobs. As with most Marxist "utopian" schemes, the idea of a
"fossil-fuel" free economy in the near future is a pipe-dream.
Top Opinion
-
CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2012/07/30 15:58:39+6Any wonder this is happening? He told you dimwits almost EVERYTHING he was planning on doing, yet you voted for him and still, altho unemployment in the black communities reaches nearly 50% or more, you continue to adore and swear your allegiance to him.
Talk about STUPID people.





















Global warming is cyclic.
This is just another part of his policy to bring America to its knees and return American workers to third-world status.
The big oil companies DO NOT want to drill for American oil because of expensive environmental protections and they would have to pay taxes on it.
They used to buy up all of the government leases to keep anybody else from drilling them. They have found that it is much cheaper to buy a few politicians.
When the Republicans take the helm, they use the EPA to prevent drilling.
We are caught in an evil crossfire of treasonous malfeasance.
There's no war on oil, Ken. Even someone with a first grade level of scientific education knows that our dependence on oil is unsistainable in the long term, and that where we used to be the world's leader in development of new technologies we now lag behind most industrialized nations in developing fuel sources that don't pollute our air and water and don't leave us beholden to foreign interests all because oil companies have spent billions bribing Right Wing members of Congress so that they can continue to make record profits and pay less taxes than Mitt Romney in the process.
Regarding the increase in oil production in the U.S. during Obama's 3½ years, none of that is his doing and none is the result of his policies -- you apparently jumped in here to attack the post without bothering to read the IBD editorial:
"When gas prices were soaring, Obama thought it clever to point out that oil output has increased on his watch. Unlike many of his other claims, this was true. But the increase has been from development on private property, not public lands rich in energy resources. It's not an increase he can take credit for. It's an increase that occurred in spite of his policies."
Talk about STUPID people.