Obama Claus. . . . . . Did Free Stuff win over Freedom?
Drue-AFCL
2012/11/09 19:19:13
|
|
|||||
|
110 votes
|
|
78% | |||
|
31 votes
|
|
22% | |||
Top Opinion
-
ChiTownGirl 2012/11/09 19:25:40Yes
+11Of course it did...do you think 47 million ppl on food stamps wanna give it up? those on disability wanna give it up? Nope...freebies, the undoing of the America we love...ron paul said it best..."We're so far gone. We're over the cliff," the Texas Republican told Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop" program. "We cannot get enough people in Congress in the next 5-10 years who will do wise things."
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-...
When Romney wants to give students below market loans, it isn't.
Interesting.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."
Too many leaners and not enough lifters.
Until entitlements are reformed so that democraps can't buy votes, we are doomed.
Elections where the majority of the states elected or already had Republican Governors?
Or how about the election were in Arkansas, a state that has had a majority democrat house and senate since its inception, but just elected a REPUBLICAN MAJORITY House and Senate for the first time in 138 years... that light? And in 2010 replaced 2 liberal State Representatives with Conservatives, and this time around replaced the other 2 liberal representatives with Conservatives. in 2010 it replaced one of two of its liberal US Senators with a Conservative. And the other ones job approval is hovering around 15% and will most certainly be replaced with a Conservative in 2014.
Is that the light you are talking about?
b. hussein obama may have won reelection but Republicans absolutely did not lose.
Moderates had little or no bearing on this election. And and thanks for bringing up racism...how many examples would you like me to post of hate, fear, and racism from the left?
http://www.theatlantic.com/po...
Read more: Gallipolis Daily Tribune
http://www.usdebtclock.org/st...
Ohio is 34th on the list of the 50 states with the most people that pay no taxes.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2...
If you read the article that I linked to, you will find that the majority (over half - 54%) are working and pay income tax, it's just that they have deductions and credits that make their federal tax liability at zero, qualifying for the 47%. Here's the breakdown:
This idea that President Obama won because there were "more takers than there were makers" is an absurd Republican myth, probably started by Frank Luntz.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/319103...
15. Oregon
% of pop. on assistance: 1.55%
2007 spending: $83.85 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 58,831
% Change in past 12 months: +27.2%
Unemployment (May 2009): 12.4%
14. Pennsylvania
% of pop. on assistance: 1.60%
2007 spending: $247.29 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 198,666
% Change in past 12 months: -1.7%
Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
13. Michigan
% of pop. on assistance: 1.65%
2007 spending: $380.93 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 164,589
% Change in past 12 months: -4.8%
Unemployment (May 2009): 14.1%
12. Rhode Island
% of pop. on assistance: 1.79%
2007 spending: $57.4 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 18,839
% Change in past 12 months: N/A
Unemployment (May 2009): 12.1%
Tie-10. Indiana
% of pop. on assistance: 1.83%
2007 spending: $102.27 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 116,430
% Change in past 12 months: -5.3%
Unemployment (May 2009): 10.6%
Tie-10. New Mexico
% of pop. on assistance: 1.83%
2007 spending: $58.87 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 36,322
% Change in past 12 months: +20%
Unemployment (May 2009): 6.5%
9. Washington
% of pop. on assistance: 1.86%
2007 spending: $265.88 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 121,864
% Change in past 12 months: 18.4%
Unemployment (May 2009): 9.4%
8. Minnesota
% of pop....
http://www.cnbc.com/id/319103...
15. Oregon
% of pop. on assistance: 1.55%
2007 spending: $83.85 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 58,831
% Change in past 12 months: +27.2%
Unemployment (May 2009): 12.4%
14. Pennsylvania
% of pop. on assistance: 1.60%
2007 spending: $247.29 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 198,666
% Change in past 12 months: -1.7%
Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
13. Michigan
% of pop. on assistance: 1.65%
2007 spending: $380.93 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 164,589
% Change in past 12 months: -4.8%
Unemployment (May 2009): 14.1%
12. Rhode Island
% of pop. on assistance: 1.79%
2007 spending: $57.4 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 18,839
% Change in past 12 months: N/A
Unemployment (May 2009): 12.1%
Tie-10. Indiana
% of pop. on assistance: 1.83%
2007 spending: $102.27 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 116,430
% Change in past 12 months: -5.3%
Unemployment (May 2009): 10.6%
Tie-10. New Mexico
% of pop. on assistance: 1.83%
2007 spending: $58.87 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 36,322
% Change in past 12 months: +20%
Unemployment (May 2009): 6.5%
9. Washington
% of pop. on assistance: 1.86%
2007 spending: $265.88 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 121,864
% Change in past 12 months: 18.4%
Unemployment (May 2009): 9.4%
8. Minnesota
% of pop. on assistance: 1.88%
2007 spending: $106.29 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 98,028
% Change in past 12 months: 5.9%
Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
7. New York
% of pop. on assistance: 1.92%
2007 spending: $1.47 billion
Total recipients (July 2008): 373,305
% Change in past 12 months: 1.2%
Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
6. District of Columbia
% of pop. on assistance: 1.99%
2007 spending: $18.67 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 11,806
% Change in past 12 months: -6.3%
Unemployment (May 2009): 10.7%
5. Vermont
% of pop. on assistance: 2.02%
2007 spending: $30.92 milliion
Total recipients (July 2008): 12,543
% Change in past 12 months: 7.3%
Unemployment (May 2009): 7.3%
4. Massachusetts
% of pop. on assistance: 2.09%
2007 spending: $295.29 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 136,033
% Change in past 12 months: 5.4%
Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
3. Tennessee
% of pop. on assistance: 2.15%
2007 spending: $91.28 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 133,505
% Change in past 12 months: 5.7%
Unemployment (May 2009): 10.7%
2. Maine
% of pop. on assistance: 2.37%
2007 spending: $61.73 million
Total recipients (July 2008): 31,148
% Change in past 12 months: 5.3%
Unemployment (May 2009): 8.3%
1. California
% of pop. on assistance: 3.30%
2007 spending: $3.28 billion
Total recipients (July 2008): 1,212,893
% Change in past 12 months: 10.4%
Unemployment (May 2009): 11.5%
Obama won where those are are the Dime.