Obama caught in another lie again.GEEEESH Part of being a progressive I guess.Ya think?
HOMBRE
2012/06/07 17:32:30
Obama Just Caught in Big Lie?
Has Barack Obama been caught in a lie that could become a major issue in the upcoming election?
During the 2008 presidential election campaign, Obama’s camp categorically denied he was ever a member of the New Party, which sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.
The denial came amid reports of Obama’s participation with the party, including several articles by WND.
Top Opinion
-
All of the above+21Here we go again.more evidence what a clown we have in the White house.He moves his lips he is lying just like the thugs in office that surround him.Ya think?























"Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:
Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.
Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, indicated as the date he joined."
http://www.nationalreview.com...
Educate yourself. With a REAL education.
Where is your proof? It's just your opinion.
I submit to you that you see it because you WANT to, not because it's "obvious".
Second, reliability of news has nothing to do with with politics. A reliable news outlet either reports the news or it does not. If it injects ANY political slant, it ceases being news immediately. Hence, why WND is not reliable.
besides a leftie one .....!
Real news has no political bias. It's just the news.
besides a leftie one .....!
now can you answer the question,.......?
give me a reliable source of information whom you depend on !
and no other resource is even debateable ?
then this is evident in the prior assessmants of your pre programmed indoctrination ..
as in "the submliminal programming of the weak minded "
I rest my case ..
unless you have an inteligent sources " no biased " ....!
Not at all. I'm entirely open to differing viewpoints. The problem is that people like you are NOT. And I'm tired of banging my head against a wall trying to be civil and fair with people who have no interest in returning the favor.
"and no other resource is even debateable ? "
Sure they are. I'm just tired of "debating" with people who have no interest in facts or evidence.
"I rest my case"
You have no case. Because you know nothing about me or my beliefs aside from the fact that I'm tired of dealing with biased, willfully ignorant people like you.
your comment :::
What's the point? You're clearly one of those jokers who thinks that the only reliable news source is one that shares you biases.
Real news has no political bias. It's just the news.
I then asked you for "your reliable source '
then YOUR REPLY .....
-----------------------------...
Nope. Because you're going to say that everything but your right wing propaganda rags are "leftie" and I simply don't care to get into that discussion again. I've had it at least a hundred times (I'm not kidding) with other right wingers on this site and I'm tired of it.
reply
-----------------------------...
I applaude any source you can provide "NON BIASED " EITHER WAY !!
and seems apparent my first assumption was correct ..that no other source other than a left leaning site is appropriate for you time ,,,thus biased based source ..
then your reply ........::::::
-----------------------------...
What's the point? You're clearly one of those jokers who thinks that the only reliable news source is one that shares you biases.
Real news has no political bias. It's just the news.
reply
so I just want a resource other than a NON biased source ,,
is it because you have no inteligent rebuttal ?
You're only assuming that because you want to. As I've said, you've made it clear what you think. I don't have any inclination to waste my time posting any of the wide variety of news sources I use because you'll just call everything that isn't right leaning a "leftie" source. I've played that game. I have no interest in doing it with you.
"so I just want a resource other than a NON biased source"
That's just it. You won't accept any as unbiased because they don't confirm YOUR OWN biases.
Right wingers think that Fox "News", World Net Daily, American Thinker and other right wing sites are unbiased. Left wingers think that MSNBC, Huffington Post, Daily Kos and others are unbiased. They're both wrong.
The issues stem from when right wingers accuse other media outlets WITHOUT political bias of having bias because they don't parrot the same ridiculous right wing BS as the outlets they listen to.
The point is simple: You won't accept any real news outlets because they're not reporting the news in the way YOU want them to- with right wing bias. To you jokers, everything that isn't overtly right wing MUST be leftist when, in fact, there are plenty of news outlets with no political bias at all.
but you being biased & openly "BIASED "
you cannot present any oponion & resouces other that this...
I'm an independent politically thinking person ...I use a common sense approach ,, and dont care for dems or repubs ....
so produce or provide evidence for your claims ,,,,"UNBIASED "
you cannot ...!
you continie to use the righties //lefties ,,comments ....say something that uses common sense .....& ofcourse inteligence ......
doesnt seem you can .....
GOOD DAY ....../\ ........