Obama Attorneys Without Defense In FL Eligibility Case?
Judge Terry Lewis in Leon County has set a hearing for June 18 to consider arguments from the attorneys for Barack Obama and Attorney’s representing Michael Voeltz, who filed the challenge to Obama’s name being on the state ballot.
Judge Lewis is famous for being the judge that was crucial in the 2000 election between Geroge W. Bush and then vice-president Al Gore.
Voeltz is represented by Attorney Larry Klayman’s law firm. Support for Klayman is coming from ConstitutionActionFund.org. What is most interesting in all of this is that this case is not being brought forth by Republicans, but a Democrat.
Klayman cited a U.S. Supreme Court case, Minor v. Happersett as the grounds for determining a “natural born citizen.” The Constitution puts a restriction on the office of president of the United States that it puts on no other office and that is to make sure there are no divided loyalties to any other nation.
Klayman’s argument is one that has not been used in each of the previous cases in the states where Barack Obama’s eligibility has been questioned before a court.
However, one thing was clear in the outcome. The Minor v. Happersett ruling defines “natrual born citizen” as the offspring of two U. S. citizens. Klayman is thus making his argument from the birth certificate that Barack Obama has put out which clearly shows that his father was not a U. S. citizen but was a citizen of Kenya.
To understand the citizenship argument from a legal precedent, the below chart from TheObamaFile.com makes understanding the legal terms used for “natural born citizen”, “citizen by statute”, and “native born citizen” easy to understand. It cites the relevant precedence for the use of these terms in the history of American jurisprudence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Natural Born | Both are U. S. | AND | Born in the U.S. |
|
| US Constitution Minor v. Happersett Perkins v. Elg, Citizen Born to at least 1 OR Born in the U.S. OR Naturalized US Constitution U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, Perkins v. Elg, Native-Born
Born in the U.S.
US Constitution U.S. v. Wong Kim Perkins v. Elg,
Mr. Klayman said, “The framers were not stupid. They understood that a president with divided loyalties could present a security and other risks for our nation.” According to Klayman, “Obama’s Muslim heritage, which emanates from his Kenyan father (who had to be deported from the U.S.), frankly explains why he frequently sides with and takes actions to further the interests of Muslim nations against the United States |
Read More: http://frontporchpolitics.com/2012/06/obama-attorn...
Top Opinion
-
LADY LIBERTY SILLY WORDSMITH 2012/06/02 04:58:07+3ALMOST FOUR YEARS AS the POTUS, OBAMA HAS SHOWN MORE THAN
ENOUGH OF WHICH SIDE HE SUPPORTS and IT'S TOO OBVIOUS: MUSLIM'S!






















No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
ENOUGH OF WHICH SIDE HE SUPPORTS and IT'S TOO OBVIOUS: MUSLIM'S!