OBAMA admits FEMA camps real.....!!!!!!!

Amazing; both that he had the balls to make that speech and that, after all he's done, he remains vertical!

That amazes me too.

And as soon as he's ensconced at the "Internet Comfort Console" when the Marshall LAw is firmly in place he'll dump the Supreme Court like he dumped the Congress.
The camps are a little addition to get rid of those Bloggers who didn't agree to love their MAster of the World

I just gained a little respect for Rachael Maddow...

There have been a couple of times :)

There have been a couple of times :)

Of course they are. And we're one little "race war" away from populating them. Imagine what is going to happen when they find that Zimmerman idiot "Not Guilty" of murder, (they should have charged him with Manslaughter as they CANNOT prove that he PREMEDITATED). People are going to go apes**t. Imagine the L.A. Riots on a nationwide scale and with MASSIVELY MORE uneducated, unprincipled buffoons involved. And then, they have the means to declare "Martial Law". Do some research on "Martial Law". All of the parameters are written and ready to set it in motion, but there has NEVER been written a modus operandi for going back to normal conditions. I wonder why?

Unfortnately for Obama the military would be needed to impement such camps. Never going to happen. Trust me I have been in the military since 1991. The military does not blindly support the president, which is why when we raise our hand and give our oath we swear to support the president and defend the Constitution. Any president that disavows that same oath and tries to destroy the country and the Constitution is not going to get blind support from the military. At least not me and about 75% of the people I work with.

I sure hope you are right about that. I have often wondered if the military would turn against American citizens if ordered to. I am not convinced they won't.

Not without good cause to defend the country we won't.
If there were 100K people who infiltrated through Mexico who were really terrorists and they started committing violence in the USA and they just happened to be citizens becasue of the "dream act" or something like that - then yes we would probably have no problems acting on US soil.
The only way we can do that now is if Martial Law is implemented and that is only done in a case of National Emergency.
It has been done on the State level before in LA / Katrina - La CA riots and Detroit riots, but it has never been done on a National scale.
The average person in the military believes in America and is willing to give their life to support you right to have freedom and family.
We are certainly not going to turn on you and start killing you without a VERY VERY convincing reason and certainly not in the name of politics.

Don't forget there was a Marine administratively discharged for his facebook page. One of the things he mentioned is that he would never disarm Americans if ordered too. That is why I stay anonymous on these blogs, but trust me - that Marine speaks for a lot of people. The majority of us just have families to care for and we cannot afford to lose our jobs - especially when there is a good chance Obama will lose the election in NOV.

Thx...good to know we are NOT alone.

There are reports of 100,000's of Chinese and Russian military practicing urban warfare on U.S. soil, the American military won't be the ones kicking your door in.

Neither am I.Men with families to feed and house do not always think the way we hope they will.

Regardless of power or poistion you need the "chain of command" to follow your orders for that power to be implemented. Military members are only bound by their oath to follow "lawful orders" - lots of cases of people being prosecuted in Vietnam for saying "I was just following orders" - Killing or taking away the liberty of the Americian people for political reasons is not a lawful order in my opinion. I do not care how many stars you have

Killing even ONE Iraqi or Afghanistani in their own country is NOT Constitutional. Killing over ONE MILLION Iraqis now, you can NOT defend using the Constitution, or ANY logical position.

Gee - and I guess we would have still killed them if they had not invaded Kuwait or flew jets into the trade centers - people like you are all the same - Delusional

1. FACT - The Kuwaitis were diagonally drilling and stealing Iraq's oil. Ambassador Gillespie brought this fact, and the fact that Iraq wanted to stop the theft with military action to Washington DC. Mr. Gillespie was told that the US would not interfere in Iraq's retaliation, and that message was returned to Saddam Hussein. Therefore, Iraq was well within their rights to attack Kuwait.

2. FACT - Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan flew US planes into the WTC. Even if you believe the lie the TV told you, it was Saudi and Yemeni's who performed nearly impossible maneuvers their very first time with virtually no training.

3. FACT - Osama bin Laden was removed from the FBI's most wanted list in 2002 for lack of any evidence whatsoever that he was involved with 9-11.

4. FACT - Osama bin Laden died December 2002 of kidney failure.

5. FACT - Everything you've been told contrary to these facts is a lie, especially
"Seal Team 6" which doesn't and didn't exist.

Now, you get to either continue to live in denial as a fool believing what your government-controlled media tells you, or you can actually investigate the FACTS I've stated above and learn the truth. I spent over 2,000 hours pulling back the curtain, though. I don't expect you to get it in 5 minutes.

What facts - please enlighten me as to why the Iraqis had to invade Kuwait and murder and rape to mine their own oil
Also, I have worked with the members of Seal Team Six on 3 occasions - so more BS - I guess the men walking around in front of me were apparitions - Oh Yeah did I mention I am a military officer

Please give me the facts instead of claiming that what you are saying is a fact and I will work on the rest of your BS
You conspiracy theorist pukes make me laugh - please get away from your computer and comic books and experience the real world a little bit - it may do you some good - but I doubt it.

You and I both know you're spewing the BS. There is no need to continue.

2 training a one real world - look up the 8th SOS aircraft tail number 0551 - we went real world to Haiti in 1992 to evacuate the President and his closest staff members before the before the military dictatorship could kill him - I saw it released in a Pentagon news article - otherwise it would still be classified . 8th SOS woks out of AFSOC - Hurlburt Field FL - all things you have never heard of unless you know to research them

I was engineering targeting circuits for missiles when you were still in school pants. I know what's real, Squatch. Seal Team 6 isn't and wasn't. If someone "told you" they were in Seal Team 6, you obviously didn't have the clearance to "need to know" otherwise.

Get over it. We will.

you are really old then - i am 45 - i am only a LT because i am a prior E

you conspracy pukes are funny - you probably believe the cia crashed jets into the wtc

call them what you want, but i worked with some bad ass seals that would put you 6 feet under faster than you could change your depends

what does it really matter what they are called
next you will say seal beach and cornado dont exist

Since it is a verifiable fact that Dick Cheney is solely responsible for the missile attack on the Pentagon, it is very feasible that Dick Cheney had command over the RC aircraft and planted explosives in all 3 World Trade Center buildings that fell at free-fall speed on their own footprints.

OK - and I saw Bigfoot get into a UFO behind my house the other night

Great! You most likely wouldn't be the first.
The difference is many people, a lot brainier than you, have scientifically proven that the official story of 9-11 is not possible.
http://ae911truth.org/ You go ahead and believe what you see on FOX, I'll go with my own eyes and science.

The problem is that you have to consider the source. I work in the military but I am also in the Medical field. If an MD wants to know how a drug works the last person you want to ask is the Rep for that company
Likewise, an educated person knows, that evidence is not evidence unless it is independently verified.
A bunch of conspiracy geeks swapping stories hardly meets the burden of proof.

The scorched cars 1/2 mile from the buildings is all the proof you need that the official story didn't happen. Now, it takes about 1,000 hours of study to come to know what DID happen.

again from conspiracy sources - when you have your mind made up going in - it is easy to come to any conclusion you want
For example - I assume you are talking about cars a half mile form the pentagon.
I have taken a few physics classes in my day. There was limited damage to the building which is why this whole nonsense is even going on.
If it was a tomahawk the war head is made to explode - not just catch fire like burning jet fuel.
Are you saying there was an explosion powerful enough to cause damage a half mile away but the building is still standing???
That is physically impossible.

Your problem is in your assumption. This had nothing to do with the Pentagon. This was all around the WTC complex. Look up SCORCHED CARS or look at this.

This was not an explosion, but a directed energy weapon.

OK - I assumed it was the pentagon because a "half mile" is not an accurate measurement, but let's say you are right and it is 800 meters. Are you saying the towers did not rain down fiery debris in that radius. Didn't another building next to the trade center become so badly damaged that it collapsed and if that is the case it would extend the radius of damage. Also, it is pretty apparent that planes crashed into the center via video evidence and all. One even captured Atta(?) smiling as he drove his place into the WTC - then he figured out there wasn't 40 virgins waiting for him.

On the lighter side - where is Sam Kinison when you need him???
"You just thought living with 40 women forever was heaven - It is really HELL - AAHHHH AAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

"Fiery debris" does not completely evaporate an engine block while leaving the body of the car intact, but bare of paint. Please, educate yourself on Dr. Judy Wood and Directed Energy Weapons before throwing guesses at an extremely important scenario. The orange explosion marks on the picture are where cars were melted.

Oh God - were the Star Trek years good to you???
Remember I am an AF Officer and I am stationed at a test wing base. The only weapon we have of that nature is mounted to a 747
Also - every fighter pilot knows this - if it is a line of sight energy weapon you have to have an angle of attack to use it
So in a city with skyscrapers the plane would have to be flying straight down to attack a car
Someone besides your fellow acid heads would have seen it Also if a energy weapon had the power to melt an engine block it would have bored a hole hundreds of feet into the ground
Probably would be good for mining dont you think - but even they still use train and rail machines with massive drills on the front
You are more far gone than I thought - made any trips to spy on area 51 lately

Never said it was done by a plane. You really make assumptions quickly, don't you, Squatch?

This was done by anti-grav and satellite based weapons. I worked the predecessors of these weapons and satellites in the 1980s MYSELF. I had access to the designs of all 4 groups of DEW at the time, Space-based, Ground-based, Charged Particle, and Neutral Particle.

What you obviously don't know, is that a static field can be setup, (on 9-11 they stalled a hurricane off the coast of NY and brought a high pressure system in from the west) then two RF frequencies can be bathed across an area with a beat-freq resonant to the material you want to shatter. This is Tesla technology. On 9-11, it was the resonant freq of steel that they created. It SHATTERED the steel into powder, even the re-bar in the concrete.

If the entire 110 story building fell down, you'd have 22 stories of rubble. There was less than one story piled on the ground. Where did the tower building materials go?

By the way, I'm a pilot and a physicist, I'm in my 50s, and I appear to have a helluva lot more experience in exotic weapons than you do!

Fair enough - I have seen some weird things since I have been in the AF - enlisted in 1991 - now an O3E - You still have to deal with independent video from multiple private citizens showing planes crashing into the trade centers and one WTC security cam showing Atta smiling right before his plane hit the building.
If the CIA was going to go through the trouble to brainwash these people into performing this act why would they also need a laser weapon?
I would not bet my life you are wrong, but what would the payoff / motivation be for this?
The USA has steadily gone down hill since 9/11.
CIA agents are not robots. They have family in the USA as well. I am not sure they would be vested in a plan to kill American citizens and wreck the economy to the detriment of their own families.

1. CIA in general wasn't in on the scam. It was a small group of VERY powerful and connected people run by Dick Cheney.

2. WTC cameras were off. Any video "from them" is fake.

3. You can't find any REAL independent video. FBI confiscated everything.

4. Of the Arabs mentioned, most were CIA assets.

5. Hundreds of billions in gold was stolen from under the towers.

6. Bush bought 97,000 acres in Paraguay. These guys families' aren't hurting any.

Agreed - that is more how I think something like this could be implemented - more with the help of a large Federal Agency - i.e. Homeland Security - It would be similar to the crackdown on the Communists during the Hoover years of the FBI - At his time I just don't see military support for this type of thing - Don't get me wrong, I will give my life or kill for a lawful order, but I am certainly not going to turn on the people I am sworn to defend.

And I will be there right beside you. No matter what color, ethnicity, or religion. We are Americans first. I do not see us being led quietly into death camps the way the Jews were. Does the term "from my cold / dead hands" ring a bell.