Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment At Harvard Law Review?
~ The Rebel ~
2011/11/10 04:47:36
During Barack Obama’s tenure as the
president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s,
at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university
officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their
positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.
The men complained of sexually suggestive
behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and
they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to
leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from
talking about their departures.
In
a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration
repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations
of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address
questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial
settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.
THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the
identities of the two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for
privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.
Read More: http://conservativetalk.org/2011/11/07/obama-accus...
Question Closed
Top Opinion
-
Dark Demonic™ ★ The Origina... 2011/11/10 05:23:15
UPDATE: Third man comes forward to AP.
The AP:
A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago. He says the behavior included a private invitation to his apartment.
He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation. The White House declined to comment.
got to give him a pass on that , look at his husband mitchele , no wonder....
A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago. He says the behavior included a private invitation to his apartment.
He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation. The White House declined to comment.
It's the same thing with Cain. The only thing that makes it the least bit credible to me is that they actually paid off not one, but two separate women to keep them quiet, which tells me something must have been going on. That is far more evidence that something went on than anything related to the Sinclair allegations. Had they not paid them off, and if they were just making accusations, I would dismiss it as hearsay, but that's not the case.The fact that he kept changing his story, and the fact that he keeps blaming different people doesn't help his case either.
I assume you were aware of the fact that the piece you posted here was not true, and was taken directly from the Politico article about Cain when you posted it. At ...
It's the same thing with Cain. The only thing that makes it the least bit credible to me is that they actually paid off not one, but two separate women to keep them quiet, which tells me something must have been going on. That is far more evidence that something went on than anything related to the Sinclair allegations. Had they not paid them off, and if they were just making accusations, I would dismiss it as hearsay, but that's not the case.The fact that he kept changing his story, and the fact that he keeps blaming different people doesn't help his case either.
I assume you were aware of the fact that the piece you posted here was not true, and was taken directly from the Politico article about Cain when you posted it. At least I sure hope you were. Look at how many people didn't even bother to follow the links you provided, and just took it all a s factual without even checking to see if it was the least bit valid. They do the same thing with the crap that flies around on the internet. They believe it because they want to believe it.
are you an attractive older man???
Edited: in fact, the media, tries to suppress them, by keeping conservatives in the headlines with false accusations.
Did the MSM media ignore Monica Lewinski? Did the MSM ignore John Edward's and his mistress? Wake up! If there was even a shred of truth to any of the ridiculous rumors about the President being Gay, the MSM would be all over it in a heartbeat. It never even occurs to you people that the reason they don't "investigate" things like that is because they already have checked into it and found that there is nothing there but idle gossip.