Now that OBAMACARE is the law of the land. . . . . . . . will you or will you not accept the CHIP?

by Drue-AFCL Posted 2012/06/30 19:33:32

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	I WILL NOT ACCEPT THE CHIP	147 votes	92%
	SURE SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT IDEA. . . SIGN ME UP	13 votes	8%

More polls by Drue-AFCL

Donald ... to Drue-AFCL 2012/07/01 02:44:51

Of course there is a chip in existence; however, there is absolutely no evidence that anyone will ever be required to have one implanted.

Despite all of the clucking noise, the sky is not really falling.

reply
B.W. to Donald ... 2012/07/01 02:22:58

Not yet anyways.

reply
Donald ... to B.W. 2012/07/01 11:52:44

There is no evidence that the state will ever require citizens of the U.S. to accept a microchip.

reply
Q 2012/06/30 22:06:03 (edited)

SURE SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT IDEA. . . SIGN ME UP

+6
Too bad its a total fabrication that was debunked long ago, only a brain dead conservative would buy into this right wing drivel. One right wing nut the other day even went as far as to say that the chip would release cyanide gas by a remote control command from the govt.

It was in the bill that didn't pass so this is a lie, and even then the only way that anyone would get a chip is if they had an implanted medical device like a pacemaker and the rifd chip was meant to be implanted to track the effectiveness of the implanted medical device and for help with recalls which happen all to often.

I hope this post is satire but I doubt it.

reply
rocat to Q 2012/06/30 22:35:15

+1
if it is fabrication...
why was it in the early version of the health bill???

are bills about fabrications written often???

reply
Q to rocat 2012/06/30 23:03:21

+3
It was originally intended to create a registry to collect data on implanted medical devices like pacemakers to track their effectiveness and help in the case of a recall.

The fabrication was that the US govt. would require all US citizens (Not just those with pacemakers, insulin pumps, etc, etc.) be forced to get an implant.

It seems that there are enough gullible people who buy into these kooky conspiracy theories that they decided to drop it, it seems that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth to some people.

reply
rocat to Q 2012/06/30 23:09:42

+1
the early version was quite clear in its language...
and it was not about pacemakers etc...
nice dodge... but no prize-

further...why would a pacemaker monitoring device ...
need to access bank info???

you did not read the early bill...did you???

reply
Q to rocat 2012/06/30 23:20:25

+2
So go ahead and post the part where the language was so clear, surely you don't expect me to take your word for it do you? And don't use some right wing blog or some World Nut Daily clip, post the relevant portion contained in the bill that you claim accesses your bank info.

And of course I didn't read the 2800 page bill, its so complicated that only the health care experts could grasp its many complexities thats why most of the politicions had their own staff lawyers and experts in the field read it and explain it to them.

I seriously doubt that you actually took the time to read it but rather only the cherry picked parts quoted out of context by right wing bloggers and the conservative media.

reply
rocat to Q 2012/06/30 23:30:36

+1
so you do speak from an uninformed position-
thought so-

dismissible then-

also-
your bias is showing...

and i loathe rwnjs-
so no cigar there-

reply
Q to rocat 2012/06/30 23:46:47

+1
Just as I thought you can't post it because it doesn't exsist and we both know you didn't read it either.
.

reply
rocat to Q 2012/06/30 23:50:45

+1
ok-

the info is there-
despite your opinion-

but i am no handholder-
nor do i comply with the assignment of busywork-
ever-

reply
Q to rocat 2012/07/01 00:00:23

+1
We all know what you're currently holding in your hand, and its probably a failure as well. Good thing they make boner pills now or you'd be sh*t out of luck.

reply
rocat to Q 2012/07/01 00:06:15

+1
finally-
the real q emerges-
excellent!!!

after all that pompous verbiage...
we see you now-

you should have posted another juvinile pic ...
with that comment-

ahhh...
opportunity wasted-

reply
Al B Th... to Q 2012/07/01 03:06:01

You don't think we are going to believe you,do you?

reply
Q to Al B Th... 2012/07/01 14:39:33

Of course not, you conspiracy minded nuts are off the rails and theres no reasoning with you on this and other issues like the president's eligibility to be president or him suppodedly being a secret Muslim that sympathises with the terrorists. You nutters reject all the facts and truths that don't allign with your hairbrained conspiracies.

That or maybe you can post the portion of the HC law that contained the supposed provision concerning the neferious intent of the RIFD chips, but we know that you won't because its not in it.

reply
Common ... to Q 2012/06/30 23:27:37

drivel?

Blahahahahhahahaaha

How's your cave under your parents room? Take a shower some time and see that the sun actually does come up in the morning.

Brilliant!!!

reply
Q to Common ... 2012/06/30 23:55:16 (edited)

Watch out for those circling black govt. helicopters, you do know they're tracking you right now don't ya? I see a FEMA concentration camp in your near future Sparky.

P.S. The Raiders suck by the way, they're losers just like you.

reply
Common ... to Q 2012/07/01 00:13:00

Brilliant, another liberal saying something about an AVATAR. You liberals are pathetic. Now, come out of your moms cave and see there actually is sunlight.

Brilliant!!!

reply
Q to Common ... 2012/07/01 02:09:51

reply
John Boy to Q 2012/07/02 21:55:09

I am willing to bet that you could not play for the Raiders ! If you did, I bet your tune would change about their abilities. Even me being a big man fairly athletic, I would get my ass kicked !!! Did not mean to get off subject, but they are pro players and do not suck !!!

reply
Pm 2012/06/30 22:03:37

I WILL NOT ACCEPT THE CHIP

+1
there is no chip. lib scare tactic

reply
Drue-AFCL to Pm 2012/07/01 02:07:09

Yes there is and it is not a lib scare tactic.

reply
Pm to Drue-AFCL 2012/07/01 02:17:48

+2
Ya, my dog has one. Ive heard of this RFID chip for 10 years now. Its not going to happen. Just another scare tactic to get you to hate the government.

reply
Drue-AFCL to Pm 2012/07/01 02:42:00

We don't need anymore reasons to hate the government than we already have!!

reply
RED DAWN 2012/06/30 21:51:24

I WILL NOT ACCEPT THE CHIP

+1
With the chip you get a new suit, on the back is printed "THIS UNIT BELONGS TO THE OBAMANATION" Hope you like brown.

reply
Donald ... to RED DAWN 2012/06/30 22:05:07

+2
There is no chip.

reply
RED DAWN to Donald ... 2012/06/30 22:20:24

I know you checked with "Snopes.com"

reply
Donald ... to RED DAWN 2012/06/30 22:39:12

+2
What is the source for your claim?

You claimed, "With the chip you get a new suit, on the back is printed "THIS UNIT BELONGS TO THE OBAMANATION" Hope you like brown."

As Christopher Hitchens observed, "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."

You may consider your assertions dismissed.

reply
Drue-AFCL to Donald ... 2012/07/01 02:07:42

Yes there is. . . . . . . .

reply
Donald ... to Drue-AFCL 2012/07/01 02:52:12

+1
Please show me the law that requires me to have a microchip implanted in my body.

reply
Drue-AFCL to Donald ... 2012/07/01 02:55:53

It is going to start out with digital medical records and positive ID. It isn't "a law" persae at the moment, but it will. I work in the Health Industry.

reply
Donald ... to Drue-AFCL 2012/07/01 12:07:08

First off, the fact that you work in the health care industry does not lend authority to your claims. Your claim does not reflect a consensus that exists amongst legitimate experts in the health care field.

Secondly, there is no mandate requiring anyone to be implanted with any type of microchip or device, for any reason. There is no evidence supporting your claim that implanted microchips will start out with digital medical records and positive I.D. Likewise, you have offered nothing to support your claim that implanted microchips will be mandated in some non-existent future law. I reject your claim to know the future.

As Christopher Hitchens observed, "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."

reply
Taitafalcon 2012/06/30 21:46:41
Donald Eric Kesler 2012/06/30 21:44:38 (edited)

SURE SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT IDEA. . . SIGN ME UP

+4
Unfortunately, there is no chip. It is yet another lie being used to manipulate the fearful and gullible.

http://www.snopes.com/politic...

reply
apacheh... to Donald ... 2012/07/01 02:24:06

+2
OMG! you talk about gullible people. then you use snopes as your reference! that is just too funny!

reply
Donald ... to apacheh... 2012/07/01 02:52:48

+1
Please show me the law that requires me to have a microchip implanted in my body.

reply
Maddog 2012/06/30 21:39:54

I WILL NOT ACCEPT THE CHIP

+3
Sure, you can put a chip in me...but you'll have to kill me first! (At great risk to yourself, I might add.)

reply
Donald ... to Maddog 2012/06/30 21:48:45

+1
There is no chip.

http://www.snopes.com/politic...

reply
Maddog to Donald ... 2012/07/01 03:02:43

+1
I know. I'm just play along with the widespread paranoia.

reply
Donald ... to Maddog 2012/07/01 12:08:53

+1
It is hard to distinguish genuine paranoia from satire.

reply