Obamatax hasn't been passed, it has just taken one more step down the road to defeat.
Now that Obamatax IS the biggest tax increase in the history of the world...does that make Obama the biggest liar in the history of the world?
Now that Obamacare has passed, shouldn't Rush keep his promise and move to Costa Rica?
C-ZAR™, Emperor of the PHÆT
2012/06/30 13:58:51
See ya Rush!
Top Opinion
-
Mrs. maggot 2012/06/30 20:14:41No, Rush should stay here in America and be known as a promise breaker and a ...






















The typical troll.
You seem to dislike us so much.
As it happens, I was inadvertently born (ironically enough) in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (parents on holiday) and raised in London. I love the US. I attended university here. I've CHOSEN her as my home.
Doesn't mean I can't be honest ...or does it? If see fit, I'll call anybody I'd like a twit (or worse). You fit into the 'or worse' category, but I must be mindful of the TOS. Shame.
But, of course, this is all simply a diversionary tactic, as you’re unable to hold your own on the topic at hand.
Edit:
Is the new definition of troll anybody who disagrees with you or holds an opposing political ideology? That's a new one. I thought the purpose of this site was for discussing different points of view.
You're incredibly intolerant and uneducated.
Brock University!
Brock university? Really, you'd have better luck using berkley.
But they are all progressive nuts feeding BS to idiots who pay astronomical fees to be spoon fed political lies.
Your not very convincing gnat.
http://www.livescience.com/18...
But don't read it ...you might learn something. The sky might fall. Run for the hills.
You conservative posters keep adding to its credibility. I've never seen people fear education and understanding quite like this lot does.
Too bad you got brain washed. It didn't work It's still full of crap.
Edit:
There are two things I do exceptionally well. Both are because of education and MUCH study and practice. I wouldn’t trade my education for anything.
I have a fantastic profession; it provides me with great satisfaction.
Not caring is closely related to being bored, isn’t it? Same excuse I discussed above.
Turning a phrase is fun with you. You're still a bore.
You SHOULD know that a ‘turn of phrase’ is generally a unique and skilful way of expressing a thought/idea, not effing up an exceedingly common phrase already in use.
And if by ‘symantics’ you meant the word having to do with quibbling over the meaning of something, that word is properly spelt with an E, that is, semantics. Write that on your index card next to obsequious, puerile, and sycophant. I expect you’ll find some absurd way of sneaking it into a future comment to 'prove' your intelligence …crafty bugger that you are. Well, at least you’ll get it right then.
Edit:
Please read.
Opinions are easy …informed ones, much less so. It does take time and energy to arm yourself with information: EFFORT (aka, reading). But you see many of these posters do the same (left and right). They hear something on MSNBC or Fox (or worse) and run with it. Problem is, those institutions are propaganda machines. They have an agenda. Intelligent people don’t allow themselves to swallow anything without reading the label.
There are many conservative people I respect. They are intelligent, compassionate people with whom I simply have a difference of opinion (or many). But I don’t seem to be able to find them here on Soda Head. This is a shouting competition with no prerequisite for intelligence. I don’t suppose I understand the fun in that except from a highly adolescent perspective.
I think I could deal with that (^) if it included wit. I enjoy witty people (irrespective of ideology), but as they say …you can’t play a game of wits with the witless; it simply doesn’t work.
And contrary to popular assumption on SH, reading is not a painful prospect, as you know. It’s actually quite enjoyable.
There's nothing at all wrong with admitting you don’t know something. Nobody kn...
Opinions are easy …informed ones, much less so. It does take time and energy to arm yourself with information: EFFORT (aka, reading). But you see many of these posters do the same (left and right). They hear something on MSNBC or Fox (or worse) and run with it. Problem is, those institutions are propaganda machines. They have an agenda. Intelligent people don’t allow themselves to swallow anything without reading the label.
There are many conservative people I respect. They are intelligent, compassionate people with whom I simply have a difference of opinion (or many). But I don’t seem to be able to find them here on Soda Head. This is a shouting competition with no prerequisite for intelligence. I don’t suppose I understand the fun in that except from a highly adolescent perspective.
I think I could deal with that (^) if it included wit. I enjoy witty people (irrespective of ideology), but as they say …you can’t play a game of wits with the witless; it simply doesn’t work.
And contrary to popular assumption on SH, reading is not a painful prospect, as you know. It’s actually quite enjoyable.
There's nothing at all wrong with admitting you don’t know something. Nobody knows everything. Takes a strong person to say, “I don’t know” and an even stronger one to do something about it.
Weak-minded people have nothing to offer anybody, including themselves.
I can't argue with anything you've said. I know. I'm a horrid wench, lol. I prefer complex snowflake.
^.^) ...... ♪*
It’s not my fault you think knowing the definition of puerile makes you an intellectual.
It’s not my fault you can’t spell semantics.
It’s not my fault (nor Ace's) that you don’t know the meaning of a turn of phrase.
It’s not my fault that you haven’t made one substantive comment throughout.
It’s not my fault you adhere strictly to your party’s talking points and have no ability to suss things out on your own.
It’s not my fault you have an exceptionally fragile ego.
All of those are YOUR problems. But rather than take responsibility, you’ve blamed them on the fact that I’m a LWNJ and less than a man, or that Ace has her 'panties in a bunch'. VERY bad form, mate (VERY bad) …no sportsmanship at all.
This, by the way, is how the least developed (mentally speaking) of high school students handle defeat. But you’re a bit too old to be in an adolescent phase of development. The human brain is fully developed at age 25.
You’re not intelligent simply because you say so …you’ve got to earn that. That takes effort: study, discussion, consideration.
You’ll attack me again because your adolescent mind will demand it, but I’m quite finished, thanks.
Your posts are very generic. Aha.. I just saw that you're 'Chief Opinionator'. That struck me as highly amusing, more so than your words.
I love you LWNJ's
I have to be generic. That's so you loons can understand me. But it's nice that you are being obsequious.
And just like your gal pal here, you are pedantic.
I am not the one who feels compulsed by that foolish ego, and an inordinate concern for the opinion of a cyber "we", to continue displaying it because stopping feels impossible. You ...cannot ...stop. Think about that.
Just know that anything you type at me I get a big kick out of. I love to see the smoke coming out of your ears. It's almost palpable even over the net.
Please continue to berate me, I wear it as a badge of honor knowing that you, like all the liberal fish here, have once again taken the bait.
And you’re also correct in stating Republicans in Congress have stopped working for the good of their constituents in order to pursue blatant obstructionism. They don’t want to do their jobs; they should resign …simple. I feel certain there are good men and women in this country able and willing to take their places. I don’t think one could ever say obstructionism is an effective and agreeable means of governance.
If they’re being paid by the federal government and they’re not doing the jobs they’re paid to do, they are simply very well-paid welfare recipients. I don’t know how anybody could argue otherwise. Let them wait in line at hospital ER room for 12 hours. Blighters!
The real difference is you and I would NEVER expect it to be tolerated by our employers. We have a contract (verbal or otherwise) to be paid a certain salary in exchange for certain work. If that contract breaks down on either side, it is, from all reasonable perspectives, invalidated: NO WORK, NO MONEY - NO MONEY, NO WORK. Very simple stuff.
Don't have any of my own, but I love kids. (The little ones, not the 60 year olds ...HAHA)