Quantcast

Now Do You Believe in Global Warming?

Little Angel 2012/07/10 13:57:50

Back in February of 2010, Senator James
Inhofe's grandchildren built an igloo for Al Gore. Inhofe is an Oklahoma
Republican and the most skeptical of Congressional climate deniers;
he's the one who called global warming "the greatest hoax ever
perpetrated on the American people." The 2010 winter was one of the
snowiest in recent memory — including a massive blizzard that February
that became known as "Snowmageddon" — which skeptics like Inhofe happily
used as evidence that man-made climate change didn't really exist. So
Inhofe's daughter, son-in-law and four grandchildren built a snowpacked
igloo in Washington after one major storm, and stuck a sign on it: "Al
Gore's New Home."

Fast-forward a year and a half. The weather in Washington is
extreme again, but this time it's brutally hot, with the city in early
July setting a record for the most consecutive 95 F plus days in a row —
ten of them lined in a hyperthermic murderer's row. And the heat isn't
confined to the nation's capital; over the past few weeks, just about
every part of the country except for the Pacific Northwest has
experienced unusually high temperatures. The national weather map looks
like a U.S.-shaped burn mark. To environmentalists, the summer of 2012
is climate change in action — which led the green group 350.org to plan
an ice-based stunt of their own. Activists were going to build an ice
sculpture of the word "HOAX?" on July 7 in front of Capitol Hill, then
let it melt in Washington's triple-digit heat.

(PHOTOS: Summer Heat Wave Roasts the Midwest, Northeast)



In the end, 350.org decided not to go ahead with the
ice-melting event. (The group's executive director Bill McKibben
ultimately worried that the protest would be seen as insensitive given
the very real human toll of the heat wave.) But HOAX in ice and Al
Gore's igloo both underscore the way that the weather, more than
anything else, drives our belief in climate change — and our uneven
commitment to doing something about it. After the exceedingly mild
winter just past and a warm spring that started early, one Yale
University study found that 66% of Americans said they believe in
climate change, up from 57% in January 2010 — right in the middle of
that snowy winter. If we check in with the American public after another
snowmageddon, expect the figure to fall again.

But it's a mistake to look at climate change only through the
lens of public opinion polls, because what's happening right now in the
U.S. really is out of the ordinary — assuming that ordinary still
applies. More than 2 million acres have been burned in massive wildfires
in much of the West, more than 110 million people were living under
extreme heat advisories at the end of June and more than two-thirds of
the country is experiencing drought. Last month, 3,215 daily high
temperature records were set nationwide — and that's nothing compared to
the 15,000 set in March. The 12 months ending in May were the warmest
12 continuous months on record in the U.S. "What we see now is what
global warming really looks like," says Michael Oppenheimer, a climate
expert and a professor at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School.
"The heat, the fires, these kinds of environmental disasters."




(LIST: Top 10 Priorities for a Planet in Peril)



This isn't to say that climate change is directly causing the extreme
heat that's been suffocating much of the U.S. this summer.
Fingerprinting a single extreme weather event as evidence of global
warming — be it a heat wave, a major storm, a drought or a flood — take
years of intensive study, though researchers are beginning to make those
connections. A 2011 study in Nature made waves by linking rising
instances of extreme precipitation in the second half of the 20th
century to man-made global warming — the kind of large-scale survey that
needs to be done to make the climate change case authoritatively. The
sheer number of factors that influence individual weather events is
immense. But we do have a pretty good idea of what climate change will
look like in the years to come — if it continues uninterrupted — and it
will look a lot like this summer, this spring and this winter. "The
frequency of hot days and hot periods has already increased and will
increase further," says Oppenheimer. "What we're seeing fits into the
pattern you would expect."

Here's what we should take away from the heat: climate change is
real and it's happening now. We can disagree about how to handle it, and
how much those policies might cost, but it's long past time to
surrender to the science. Perhaps this year of extreme heat will help
shake loose the forces blocking climate change action, though judging
from the near-complete absence of global warming as an issue on the
Presidential campaign trail, that hasn't happened yet. It had better
happen soon. We're living in an igloo in the summertime, and the ice is
melting all around us. Time to face facts.


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2119129,00.htm...


I have believed in Global Warming for a very long time and
still do not understand those who don't believe. Do you
believe this is happening now? If you don't please explain
why.
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Steve 2012/07/11 14:06:25
    Steve
    +71
    Just because climate has changed in the past (over tens or hundreds of thousands of years) does not mean that Man isn't the cause of these dramatic changes over a few decades.

    Man ALONE has raised CO2 levels 40 percent in a century, that's indisputable. Also indisputable is the effect:
    Arctic ice

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Reichstolz Icarus 2012/07/11 06:59:51 (edited)
    Reichstolz
    1950-2011=61 years
    The age of the earth 100,000,000?
    I still see you lack any understanding of statistical modeling or statistical significance. You can be 99.99% confident that your minute time frame means nothing in the scope of earth's existence.
    Secondly you are comparing to a projection, which was based on another statistically insignificant data set. From a statistical perspective you are doubling down on dumb.
    Third, your temperature comparison starts a 1950, was that some magical date or was that where the trend line met the projection's preconceived conclusion?
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/10 20:01:34
    Sir Bud
    +3
    You really need to get educated and stop making a fool of yourself,although I couldn't careless.Look up Lyme disease for a start.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/10 23:45:56
    Reichstolz
    Lyme disease is not fatal.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/11 10:54:52
    Sir Bud
    +2
    Go check it out.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/11 12:59:48
    Reichstolz
    Wife is a veterinarian, no need, more than familiar with the morbidity versus mortality of Lyme disease.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/12 12:39:20
    Sir Bud
    +2
    My wife is a Biologist and "In Laws" both Vets working together-so what?.Last year a friend of a friend after being paralyzed for five years and only able to take in food in fluid form through a drinking straw-died of Borreliosis.Like I said,check it out(and all other Tickborne Diseases like Anaplasmosis, which is on the increase since the 1990's).
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/12 13:56:39
    Reichstolz
    You said lyme disease. If you want to communicate learn to do so accurately. Again anaplasmosis increased morbidity not mortality in most instances. Regarding your friends dog you sure they contracted the spirochetes, from ticks? Also, the only mortality statistics I can find are for patients that remained untreated. So did your friends not pay attention to their animal? Again, I will state with complete confidence in the analogy holds.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/13 01:34:01 (edited)
    Sir Bud
    +2
    The bacteria causing Lyme Disease are called Borrelia(Borrelia burgdorferi) and hence the scientific term for Lyme Disease is Borreliosis also known as Lyme Borreliosis.My dog coincidentally contracted it aged six months.was paralyzed over night-could only move his head.Luckily there is a antiserum for dogs.but not for humans(is a BACTERIA and not a VIRUS,therefore an antibiotic will not work to cure-only help prevent secondary symptoms).So far from our research and information during the last 14 years,the medical information being circulated in the USA is very unreliable and controversial-many doctors having different opinions etc etc.

    Now take a second and read this from the Hannover Lyme Disease Hospital in Germany.Then the Reuters regarding the USA;

    "..The number of infections is increasing constantly..

    Lyme disease, also called Borreliosis, is a malicious disease – sometimes, the period between a tick bite and onset of the illness takes years. Quick and reliable diagnosis is decisive.
    Every year, an estimated 300,000 to 700,000 people contract borreliosis in Germany. The disease is caused by bacteria, so-called borrelia.The number of borreliosis infections has increased greatly in the last 15 years due to an increased presence of ticks. By now, there is a danger of infectio...




    The bacteria causing Lyme Disease are called Borrelia(Borrelia burgdorferi) and hence the scientific term for Lyme Disease is Borreliosis also known as Lyme Borreliosis.My dog coincidentally contracted it aged six months.was paralyzed over night-could only move his head.Luckily there is a antiserum for dogs.but not for humans(is a BACTERIA and not a VIRUS,therefore an antibiotic will not work to cure-only help prevent secondary symptoms).So far from our research and information during the last 14 years,the medical information being circulated in the USA is very unreliable and controversial-many doctors having different opinions etc etc.

    Now take a second and read this from the Hannover Lyme Disease Hospital in Germany.Then the Reuters regarding the USA;

    "..The number of infections is increasing constantly..

    Lyme disease, also called Borreliosis, is a malicious disease – sometimes, the period between a tick bite and onset of the illness takes years. Quick and reliable diagnosis is decisive.
    Every year, an estimated 300,000 to 700,000 people contract borreliosis in Germany. The disease is caused by bacteria, so-called borrelia.The number of borreliosis infections has increased greatly in the last 15 years due to an increased presence of ticks. By now, there is a danger of infection all over Europe and the most parts of the world. if borreliosis is not identified in its first stage and gets immediate medical treatment, the result, even years later, can be serious complaints, such as back and joint aches, heart muscle complaints, inflammations and neurological disturbances such as headaches or signs of paralysis...".
    http://www.chc-klinik.de/?ite...
    While controversy still brews over the long-term effects of Lyme disease, a new government study concludes that the tick-borne illness is rarely a cause of death in the U.S.
    http://www.reuters.com/articl...

    Lyme Disease Statistics
    (more)
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/13 01:59:13
    Reichstolz
    So you are using Borreliosis as a general term. OK and even from your own study it points to treatable symptoms not death.
    "While controversy still brews over the long-term effects of Lyme disease, a new government study concludes that the tick-borne illness is rarely a cause of death in the U.S."

    Again I stand by my original analogy.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/13 02:05:20 (edited)
    Sir Bud
    +2
    You can stand on your head and tell us the world is flat as far as I am concerned.
    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
    The scientific term for Lyme Disease is Borreliosis and rarely doesn't mean "not fatal"!!..
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/13 02:29:42
    Reichstolz
    So you look to the exception rather than the rule. By taking that tact you would be in agreement with me, that global warming isn't man made, since I seem to be the exception.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/13 04:53:41
    Sir Bud
    +1
    P.S.And one reason you and many are misinformed regarding the mortality rates of Lyme disease(Lyme BORRELIOSIS) is because many Doctors across the States are not diagnosing patients correctly with Lyme disease.It is difficult because of the various symptoms and similarity with other diseases.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/13 05:44:35 (edited)
    Reichstolz
    Again 22 out of 305 million not worth mentioning. Too many cases have other diagnoses, correct? How can you determine that Lyme disease is the cause of death, and not one of the other diagnoses?

    While you think your knowledge superior, it isn't. I discussed this very topic with my wife, who by the way, is first or second author on 9 different journal publications on anaplasmosis in cattle, while she was doing her MPH at Iowa Sate.(http://pubget.com/paper...

    She agrees that while Borreliosis cases are difficult to diagnose, even if undiagnosed the treatment for similar diagnoses would remain the same. And furthermore morbidity is the issue in cattle because it lessens DOF and ROG, lessening ROI on feedlot animals. Very rarely is any animal or human for that matter, that is treated, going to die from any Borreliosis condition.


    I am sorry you cannot accept being proven inconsequential, but it does not change the fact that your information is inconsequential. My analogy stands, once again.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/13 07:00:05 (edited)
    Sir Bud
    +1
    You just like the attention dont you?.The one link I gave you was talking of 22 killed in just one year(year 2000,if i remember rightly).OK,you have used me now enough and I have said enough.You can try to convince yourself of yourself from now on with somebody else.Its all here in black and white.Vaya Con Dios Amigo.

    P.S."Since the CDC states that Lyme disease is under diagnosed by a factor of 10, this means that hundreds of people are dying from Lyme disease each year...".
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/13 13:28:20
    Reichstolz
    100's out of hundreds of millions, still not statistically significant. Analogy stands.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/13 02:02:33
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/13 02:31:52 (edited)
    Reichstolz
    22 out of 305 million, not statistically significant. I wouldn't make a medical decision on statistics that are insignificant.
    I stand by my original analogy.
  • jere.ch... Icarus 2012/07/10 20:53:15
  • Icarus jere.ch... 2012/07/10 21:09:42
    Icarus
    +2
    Have you always been this dumb? Keep living in your fantasy world and leave reality to us grown-ups - it's obviously beyond your capabilities as a mental midget. Your foul-mouthed ignorance contributes precisely nothing to the discussion.
  • jere.ch... Icarus 2012/07/10 21:15:07
    jere.chievres
    Well la de effen da! Arent you the Arbiter of excellence of speech!
  • Space I... Reichstolz 2012/07/10 16:28:47
    Space Invader
    +1
    wow if we're as powerful as volcanoes; don't light the farts!! lighting farts
  • Reichstolz Space I... 2012/07/10 17:07:51
    Reichstolz
    +2
    steam coming from your ears
    Yet another example of liberal thought.
  • Space I... Reichstolz 2012/07/10 17:34:10
    Space Invader
    +2
    it was a joke brother..I don't believe the crap either
  • irish -... Icarus 2012/07/10 15:11:08
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/10 15:16:26
    Sir Bud
    +3
    Reality check;We weren't there in the last ice age and the industrial revolution hadn't happened yet!.lol
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/10 17:05:45
    Reichstolz
    +2
    Yes, so the globe warming or not has nothing to do with human activity. Thank you for proving my point.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/10 20:29:24
    Sir Bud
    +2
    Mother nature has never before been in this environmental situation.It is impossible that Anthropogenic pollution combined with the massive destruction of the earths natural environment and ecosystems does not have a major, a unique and disastrous influence on the natural climate and course of Nature.It is not surprising that many idiots deny this basic fact as it was and is the ignorance combined with greed,poisoning and the over exploitation of the earth and its natural resources which has thrown us into this situation now.The only thing you have proved is that you are one of those and will remain one of those who will contribute and continue to help destroy our planet and leave future generations to suffer from the consequences.And by the way,during the last ice age and every age since the last four and a half billion years,the ozone layer protecting the earth was intact.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/10 23:49:13
    Reichstolz
    Can you prove we mother nature has NEVER experienced this before? I highly doubt it, but go ahead and extrapolate. The greatest surface area on the planet is water, what is destroying the oceans? It is not surprising that those who believe in nothing will cling to the hope that they are actually significant enough to change the earth. And you say religion is nonsense. Man made global warming is nothing more than a religion for atheists.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/14 01:04:09
    Sir Bud
    +1
    As if you are someone important to prove to anything.If you want to believe that nature has experienced anthropogenic Industrial pollution and destruction of the worlds biodiversity before,be my guest and quit wasting my time,thanks.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/14 06:52:53
    Reichstolz
    As I have seen from you in the past, sweeping generalities without thought to whether or not you could back up those generalities. Let me guess many of your associates think you are smart, and you specifically seek those types of people to associate with. You remind me of a biology professor I once had, needless to say, he wouldn't back up his conjecture either.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/14 07:36:35
    Sir Bud
    +1
    Complaining that I do not make the effort to prove to you that the Industrial revolution and anthropogenic pollution and destruction of the worlds natural environment didn't happen before is your best one yet and I just couldn't resist telling you!.While I am here here is your task for the weekend;See what you can find out about Ozone depletion. You ran out of ammo ages ago,but nice that you popped in again-was funny this time,thanks!.
    .
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/14 19:37:11
    Reichstolz
    Once again those without anything to believe in, are fools for anyone who lets them think they are important enough to change the climate. Thanks for the laugh
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/14 23:29:20
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/15 05:41:47
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/16 00:11:25 (edited)
    Sir Bud
    So when will the Dinosaurs pop up again?.LMAO(Think about that).OK,last post for you as you really are a waste of time;The situation of this planet now is unique,Although every geological period was unique speaking broadly during the last 500 million years,never before was the human impact so drastic against the natural environment and atmosphere as it has been since about 100 years.Now put two and two together and for the last time,use someone else to play with,thanks.
    Japanese wearing smog masks
     Deforestation
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/16 03:23:46
    Reichstolz
    You cannot prove it is unique we have no clue what the global temperature was 10 million years ago. Playing with those who believe in nothing, but the man made global warming religion, is fun, I'll stay right here.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/16 04:45:09
    Sir Bud
    Unless you know of a previous Industrial revolution other than the last one resulting as today in industrial pollution,land,sea and air while at the same time destroying the worlds natural environment and mass deforestation,give it a rest for gods sake man!.Please do not reply to me again here on this issue.I know what and who you are and why and as I avoid lazy and dirty people who just look for excuses to stay that way,I have been with you very patient considering.Now drop it;PLEASE.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/16 13:39:09
    Reichstolz
    Mass deforestation, destroying environment, blah, blah,blah? Hah! You may avoid those who don't believe in your religion but that doesn't make it anymore true.
  • Sir Bud Reichstolz 2012/07/16 22:54:08
    Sir Bud
    Mass deforestation, destroying environment, blah, blah,blah?.OK,have a nice life.
  • Reichstolz Sir Bud 2012/07/17 03:14:03
    Reichstolz
    Have fun praying to the government to force acceptance of your religion.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 10:41:24

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals