Quantcast

Note to Gun-Control Liberals: You Can’t Handle the Truth

☆astac☆~PWCM 2012/12/31 00:39:36

Another truth liberals can’t handle is that moral relativism is at the heart of America’s moral demise and, in turn, gun violence. Liberals have sold America on the lie that there are no absolutes, that right and wrong are relative concepts. According to liberals, what is right for you may not be right for someone else. Here is the hard truth about moral relativism that liberals do not want to discuss: If liberals are correct that there are no absolutes and we can all determine what is right, why should anyone be surprised when a young man chooses to act out his hostility toward the world using an automatic weapon. Moral relativism is the cause of the breakdown in American society that led to Sandy Hook and other incidents of gun violence. This is the truth, but liberals can’t handle the truth.

Protecting Roe v. Wade is the holy grail of liberalism. Consequently, while they weep—as they should—for the innocent children who were brutally murdered at Sandy Hook, liberals shed not a tear for the thousands who are murdered in the womb every year under the guise of “choice.” The only difference between the children who were slaughtered at Sandy Hook and those slaughtered in abortion clinics every year is their age. A society cannot choose to kill unborn babies for the sake of convenience and expect that this heinous practice will not coarsen the attitudes of people toward human life. This is the truth, but liberals can’t handle the truth.

Gun-control liberals support Hollywood, and Hollywood supports liberals. Yet every year Hollywood turns out another crop of disgusting movies that portray gratuitous violence, rape, and hedonism as not just normal but heroic. This is also true of computer games—Adam Lanza’s favorite pastime—and television, yet the filth and violence in movies, computer games, and television comports perfectly with the moral relativism of liberals. Liberals in Hollywood regularly turn out some of the most violent movies imaginable while hypocritically decrying the violence we observe daily in America. Even a fool would know that young people cannot grow up on a steady diet of gratuitous violence and not be affected by it. This is the truth, but liberals can’t handle the truth. One final truth liberals can’t handle is this: it’s not what’s in a man’s hand that makes him a killer it’s what’s in his heart—or better yet, what’s not in his heart.



Read More: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/note-to-gun-cont...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Drummerboy Embalmer 2012/12/31 18:21:22
  • Embalmer Drummerboy 2012/12/31 18:59:01 (edited)
  • Drummerboy Embalmer 2012/12/31 19:22:35
  • Defend ... Drummerboy 2013/01/01 14:34:44
    Defend Western Civlization
    +3
    this person is a Obama Cultist who hates freedom/America/Israel and Western Civilization
  • Drummerboy Defend ... 2013/01/01 14:47:20
  • Dan Embalmer 2012/12/31 18:40:03
    Dan
    +3
    Restricting any of those would not have prevented any mass killings.
  • Embalmer Dan 2012/12/31 19:03:12
    Embalmer
    +2
    Who's to say?????

    But the point is to decrease the odds of it happening so often.
  • Dan Embalmer 2012/12/31 19:16:20
    Dan
    +4
    Logic says, if a psyco wants to kill. That person will find a way. Either with a firearm a bomb or putting toxic gas in a ventilation system. Banning firearms or high capacity magazines. Just because they look scary will not do a thing.
  • Drummerboy Embalmer 2013/01/02 12:12:01
  • RED DAWN Embalmer 2012/12/31 19:10:51
    RED DAWN
    +4
    Less God is part of the moral decay but most of the problem comes from these liberal SOBs teaching their kid there is no God and that the world owes the little bastards a living.They tell them to set on their ass and someone else will take care of them.
  • Andrew 2012/12/31 13:45:03
    Andrew
    +8
    Liberals and Progressives (Regressives) don't care about the root cause of violence. They only want to use the aftermath to gain more control over the population! Fixing the problem or using actual solutions would make them expendable and they couldn't exist in a world where they weren't needed!!
  • Lanikai Andrew 2012/12/31 15:34:36
    Lanikai
    +8
    For ONCE, just for ONCE, I wish they would do the right thing and BLAME THE CRIMINAL.

    WHEN in hell do they BLAME THE CRIMINAL
  • 4570GOVT Lanikai 2012/12/31 16:21:14
    4570GOVT
    +8
    " Those People " will NEVER blame the criminal ! ( it does not fit their AGENDA )
  • 4570GOVT Andrew 2012/12/31 15:34:59
    4570GOVT
    +7
    With " Those People " , it is all about control !
  • rknothead 2012/12/31 13:40:17
    rknothead
    +3
    I don't like the liberal bias that is played everywhere, especially in our schools, thanks to the teacher unions! And I don't think just because you are a good actor, you are smarter than everyone else....acting is simply a way of fooling people on camera. but I really think the rest of this is a bit far right. I'm not in favor of govt funded abortion, that's a personal, very personal decision. But I do agree with the hollywood quote about liberals...you can't handle the truth!
  • Red Branch rknothead 2013/01/01 05:37:08
    Red Branch
    +3
    The unions do not have a whole lot to do with the liberalism that is taught in our schools. That is other than donate to liberal candidates.

    Leftists began taking control of the colleges of education and social studies at prestigous universitities during the 1920s. They began at the universities where the future leaders would be attending. It went from there.
  • casey mahoney 2012/12/31 11:45:41
    casey mahoney
    +6
    A LITTLE GUN HISTORYIn 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. >From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were round...
    ed up and exterminatedIn 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this informati...





    A LITTLE GUN HISTORYIn 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. >From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were round...
    ed up and exterminatedIn 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens. Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late! The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson. With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED! If you value your freedom, please spread this antigun-control message to all of your friends. SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!SWITZERLAND'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE. SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!! IT'S A NO BRAINER!DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET. Spread the word everywhere you can that you are a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!It's time to speak loud before they try to silence and disarm us.You're not imagining it, history shows that governments always manipulate tragedies to attempt to disarm the people.

    Defense Authorization Act
    this new bill, which passed the Senate with an alarming majority, allows the military to arrest American citizens on American soil and keep them without trial. It’s being called the “America the Battlefield” bill, because it treats your front yard like a battlefield — and every citizen like a potential enemy. It basically puts a giant asterisk next to the Bill of Rights saying, “unless we don’t feel like it.”

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/...
    and coupled with the Patriot Act disolves most of the bill of rights.
    (more)
  • 4570GOVT casey m... 2012/12/31 15:38:27
    4570GOVT
    +7
    It is clear to me ................... that the Liberals " WANT TO " be rounded up and exterminated . ( not a bad idea )
  • casey m... 4570GOVT 2012/12/31 20:20:25
  • Red Branch casey m... 2013/01/01 05:32:20
    Red Branch
    +2
    I would say your numbers are too low.
  • casey m... Red Branch 2013/01/01 14:28:55
    casey mahoney
    +1
    look it up and give me the correct numbers then
  • Greg Saunders 2012/12/31 11:04:22
    Greg Saunders
    In 2011 six people in the UK were killed by guns, in the US for the same period nearly 9000 but still much higher when you take the population difference into account despite being similar societies.

    America is much more right wing than the UK, in this case right is wrong and the UK is relatively better. Do you research anything before deciding a whole section of your own society is wrong?
  • Drummerboy Greg Sa... 2012/12/31 15:05:26
  • 4570GOVT Drummerboy 2012/12/31 15:42:46
    4570GOVT
    +6
    AMEN - Well Said !
  • Drummerboy 4570GOVT 2012/12/31 15:43:44
  • Greg Sa... Drummerboy 2012/12/31 20:19:51
  • Drummerboy Greg Sa... 2013/01/01 14:50:13
  • Greg Sa... Drummerboy 2013/01/01 17:22:36
    Greg Saunders
    "You're little snippets of personal attack completely discredit anything you might have to say of any worth"

    Don't whine about the game you start, show respect and you get it back. But it's a handy excuse to avoid the issue.
  • Drummerboy Greg Sa... 2013/01/01 17:47:35
  • CommieH... Drummerboy 2013/01/01 20:41:28
    CommieHunter - AFCL- PWCM
    +2
    AMEN!!
  • Drummerboy CommieH... 2013/01/01 20:47:02
  • Greg Sa... Drummerboy 2013/01/03 12:48:39
  • burning... Drummerboy 2013/01/03 12:17:02
    burningsnowman
    +2
    Gun crime went up 40% in the 2 years AFTER they banned guns in the UK, according to that far right noise machine the BBC:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk...
  • Greg Sa... burning... 2013/01/03 13:44:33
    Greg Saunders
    There were many other factors to that, the first is obvious because more laws mean more convictions, two because they were at a time with more drug laws which also exacerbated the problem.

    Previous to the first gun laws drugs were treated instead of criminalized by the right wing which happened later.

    Three, later immigration brought it's own crime problems with emerging and competing mafias and gangs, problems which obviously had to appear first to be handled later.

    Four, Britain was stripped off it's social organisations and the rest privatised which has led to an uncaring culture of greed, sleaze and capitalist corruption.

    Five because of all those factors crime was rising in general but as it rose and despite the economic crisis it has in fact dropped at a level way below the US.

    Six which is just logical if Americans really take to fighting over this they're going to be wiping out all the activists on either side which are the very people who you need to lead a rebellion against tyranny, which is the very reason for having them in the first place.

    And seven, even if guns were banned and the public needed them against a government they will always get them in anyway, you cannot stop a whole determined population or even a dedicated section of it.

    N.Ireland with the strictest ...





    There were many other factors to that, the first is obvious because more laws mean more convictions, two because they were at a time with more drug laws which also exacerbated the problem.

    Previous to the first gun laws drugs were treated instead of criminalized by the right wing which happened later.

    Three, later immigration brought it's own crime problems with emerging and competing mafias and gangs, problems which obviously had to appear first to be handled later.

    Four, Britain was stripped off it's social organisations and the rest privatised which has led to an uncaring culture of greed, sleaze and capitalist corruption.

    Five because of all those factors crime was rising in general but as it rose and despite the economic crisis it has in fact dropped at a level way below the US.

    Six which is just logical if Americans really take to fighting over this they're going to be wiping out all the activists on either side which are the very people who you need to lead a rebellion against tyranny, which is the very reason for having them in the first place.

    And seven, even if guns were banned and the public needed them against a government they will always get them in anyway, you cannot stop a whole determined population or even a dedicated section of it.

    N.Ireland with the strictest gun laws in Europe and the toughest anti-terrorism laws around could not stop them either. Despite stringent gun laws N.Ireland had more guns per head than the rest of the UK but in that situation without those laws it would've been anarchy and the guilty would never have been caught.

    The fear of the right is understandable but the weapons of control they have today far outweigh what gun control can do, guns just aren't as effective as they used to be. The first government of N.Ireland was brought down by social disorder not by guns, they came later but even then the second government in 74 was brought down by general strikes again not guns.

    If anything gun laws didn't cause the violence but the other way round, the Unionists wanted the government to introduce internment without trial but the government knew the dangers of oppression as did the IRA who upped their rate of bombings and shootings for that reason, after a series of atrocities and a notable killing of a 17yr old soldier the government backed down and implemented it. Recruitment for the IRA went through the roof and more were killed than in that year than any other.

    At the moment the hate is just that and the problem is with your extremists but if like N.Ireland killings start it won't stop until the people realise what is important in life and peace becomes more valuable than ideals but that takes a long time in it's realisation. Remember N.Ireland only had a population of one and a half million but produced 40,000 bombs with a similar number maimed or injured put that into American terms and see if your kids are more important.
    (more)
  • burning... Greg Sa... 2013/01/03 20:52:54
    burningsnowman
    You make good points in regards to the dysfunctional immigration system, the various corporate interests milking the system and a number of other things. Many those are of course applicable to the US. Nonetheless its worth noting that gun crime and violence in the UK was historically lower than the US even when it had no gun ban. Its continually gone up since then. Also the US has a higher non-gun related murder rate than a lot of the developed world period...
    http://www.guncite.com/gun_co...
  • Greg Sa... burning... 2013/01/05 14:07:03
    Greg Saunders
    +1
    "You make good points in regards to the dysfunctional immigration system,"

    Thank you though immigration works for rich governments that don't have to pay for their upkeep or education, not so good for the working class which does drive down their wages but we have allowed a system in based on greed.


    "Nonetheless its worth noting that gun crime and violence in the UK was historically lower than the US even when it had no gun ban."

    The professor in that other article posted was being disingenuous with her figures. Lack of gun control in Britain is a myth.

    The English Assizes of Arms of 1181 and 1252 governed arms, but predated firearms.
    The Bill of Rights 1689, England
    The Disarming Acts of 1716 and 1725, Great Britain Act applicable explicitly to the Highlands of Scotland
    The Act of Proscription 1746, essentially a restatement with harsher penalties of the Disarming Acts
    The Vagrancy Act 1824
    The Night Poaching Act 1828
    The Game Act 1831
    The Night Poaching Act 1844
    The Poaching Prevention Act 1862
    The Gun Licence Act (1870)
    The Pistols Act 1903
    The Firearms Act 1920 (10 & 11 Geo 5 c 43)
    The Firearms and Imitation Firearms (Criminal Use) Act 1933 (23 & 24 Geo 5 c 50)
    The Firearms Act 1934 (24 & 25 Geo 5 c 16)
    The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1936 (26 Geo 5 & 1 Edw 8 c 39)
    The Firearms Act 1937 (1 Edw 8 & 1...














    "You make good points in regards to the dysfunctional immigration system,"

    Thank you though immigration works for rich governments that don't have to pay for their upkeep or education, not so good for the working class which does drive down their wages but we have allowed a system in based on greed.


    "Nonetheless its worth noting that gun crime and violence in the UK was historically lower than the US even when it had no gun ban."

    The professor in that other article posted was being disingenuous with her figures. Lack of gun control in Britain is a myth.

    The English Assizes of Arms of 1181 and 1252 governed arms, but predated firearms.
    The Bill of Rights 1689, England
    The Disarming Acts of 1716 and 1725, Great Britain Act applicable explicitly to the Highlands of Scotland
    The Act of Proscription 1746, essentially a restatement with harsher penalties of the Disarming Acts
    The Vagrancy Act 1824
    The Night Poaching Act 1828
    The Game Act 1831
    The Night Poaching Act 1844
    The Poaching Prevention Act 1862
    The Gun Licence Act (1870)
    The Pistols Act 1903
    The Firearms Act 1920 (10 & 11 Geo 5 c 43)
    The Firearms and Imitation Firearms (Criminal Use) Act 1933 (23 & 24 Geo 5 c 50)
    The Firearms Act 1934 (24 & 25 Geo 5 c 16)
    The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1936 (26 Geo 5 & 1 Edw 8 c 39)
    The Firearms Act 1937 (1 Edw 8 & 1 Geo 6 c 12)
    The Firearms Act 1965 (c 44)
    The Firearms Act 1968
    The Firearms Act 1982
    The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988
    The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1992
    The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1994
    The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997
    The Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997
    The Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 Part 2

    In some cases hardly a decade has passed without yet more and unlike the NRA the gun sports association in the UK like the majority of the population support gun laws.

    "Also the US has a higher non-gun related murder rate than a lot of the developed world period..."

    You don't think they are related? Can you prove that with credible links? If you look for facts on a gun control site you'll always find the ones you want but not an unbiased truth.
    (more)
  • Birthpangs Greg Sa... 2012/12/31 15:37:50
  • Greg Sa... Birthpangs 2012/12/31 20:31:04
    Greg Saunders
    From the guys that fight crime not the media.
  • 4570GOVT Greg Sa... 2012/12/31 15:40:44
    4570GOVT
    +6
    ......................... wow ? ( interesting how people from other countries profess to be experts on American politics )
  • Greg Sa... 4570GOVT 2012/12/31 20:30:01
    Greg Saunders
    It's not unusual to know stuff where I'm from. Most of your politics is for dummies (and I'm not saying most Americans are), I'll bet if you did a survey of Republicans and Democrats on most issues they would align with their own camps rather than seriously consider the issues. That's indoctrination which is a serious problem and not just American either but it's getting more pronounced.

    If you get a split society in such a way you end up as we did in N.Ireland, both sides carrying their own flags and hating the other. It's ironic that one terrorist attack in the US did more to finish 40,000 bombs in N.Ireland than anything else.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/22 14:20:07

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals