North Korea Wants To Discuss Nukes One-On-One With The United States: Should President Obama engage in one-on-one talks with North Korea?

Sort By

Most Raves
Least Raves
Oldest
Newest

text size

Comments

Beccy August 02, 2009 00:43:44

While I think that it would be a great thing to talk to north Korea, I would just as soon wait out the next 3 1/2 years till we have someone in office who won't sell out America.
Hope & Love July 28, 2009 20:37:52

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
see what the crazy-man wants....after he disarms, mind you.
concerned July 28, 2009 19:15:13

Answered: No. North Korea is a waste of time, I see no threat.
Not Obama .. but send Hillary
+1 raves
oldcavpilot July 28, 2009 14:59:10

We've been buying them off for too long. They scream 'nukes', we give them food. They threaten South Korea and Japan, we give them food. It's a really repetetive process.

They can't afford a war; they're broke and wars are expensive. Nobody will fund them.

Time to end it. Talk to them when the nukes are gone, and proven to be gone; not before.
Tom 1313 July 28, 2009 13:45:07

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
We cant afford to think Kim Jong IL is bluffing or not. Obama should talk with them and arrange something that would prevent another useless war
Pet Rock Whisperer July 28, 2009 05:43:16

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
It beats getting into another war we can't afford.
+1 raves
Koda ~ McHottie SuperKnight ~ July 28, 2009 05:34:58

Lots of options here LOL

They probably won't shake his hands either !
ragnar_rahl July 28, 2009 04:27:44

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
Well, what the hell, do we want other people in the room?

Ambassadors are cheap, and do something once in a while. Just don't hold other actions up while you wait for the talks to end ;)
TattooedSailor July 28, 2009 03:48:52

Answered: No. North Korea is a waste of time, I see no threat.
No.. we should be bitch slapping them for holding Americans as prisoners! A conversation will go nowhere.. Obama (or Hillary) will say "please dont make missles that could reach the US" and N. Korea will say "Ok" and they will do it anyways... We should do with Kim Jong Ill what we did with Sadam Hussein!
+2 raves
bacon bits July 28, 2009 03:45:34

This is a president that just claimed the Massachusetts cops acted "stupidly"! I don't want him anywhere near North Korea! Who knows what will come out of his mouth next! He'll probably get us blown-up!
mb20fan July 28, 2009 02:59:13

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
What the heck, Obama prefers talking and diplomacy go for it... I hope that he doesn't offer them money like previous administrations have done in the past and that goes for both sides, dem, and rep. I don't think talking will do much good though as I see it just as a money grab for the north. And these people have been testing the US and others mainly us for a while since the Obama administration has taken over but I really really hope they do not give him money, because that seems to me over the last few decades that that was the only thing that kept that nut from doing some of the stuff he is doing now... I say squash his little head!
+1 / -1 raves
No Country for Young Men July 28, 2009 01:13:04

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
One of one with one of these
jitko July 28, 2009 00:53:44

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
Whether there is a threat or not, why not talk? Beats the Bush approach of "Shock and Awe" every damn thing Cheney tells them to.
+1 raves
mb20fan to jitko July 28, 2009 03:00:48

Bush and Cheney didn't use shock and awe on the north, they used money just like clinton did and everyone before him.
+3 raves
Scoop July 28, 2009 00:10:57

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
He can apologize to them, just like he has to the rest of the world! Sure we need straight dialogue with N. Korea, but I fear it will not go as we planned with Obama in the driver's seat.
+1 raves
Hannah to Scoop July 29, 2009 19:38:50

I'm still laughing at this picture. OMG
april July 27, 2009 22:15:12

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
Well somebody sure as hell better and since he is the president it only seems fitting that he be the one. I don't understand why this issue has been on the back burner what has it been a month?
-1 raves
bill July 27, 2009 22:02:53

Answered: No. North Korea is a waste of time, I see no threat.
hell no he will sell us down the tubes for sure,second he knows shit about diplomacy or art of war if he does he got it from his old man saddam hussein and uncle osama bin diaper head all obom is socialist and a big BULL SHITER
+2 raves
Dave July 27, 2009 21:19:45

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
And by "one on one," I mean put them both into a room alone, and we all win if neither one of them comes out !
+2 raves
moorrbrt1 "In God we Trust" July 27, 2009 21:07:33

No. Hopefully he will leave it to Hillary to talk to the North Koreans. I don't trust Obama.
+1 raves
mb20fan to moorrbr... July 28, 2009 03:02:22

Damn, I didn't think about it that way... And I would say that that's a pretty good idea, but then again, it's Hillary do you really think she can get it done??? after all don't they pretty much treat women like a pile of dung???
+1 raves
moorrbr... to mb20fan July 28, 2009 19:31:54

I think she has bigger balls than Obama. He only seems to do what he believes will make him come out good in the polls.
+1 raves
mb20fan to moorrbr... July 31, 2009 22:48:48

Yeah, but in reality, isn't that what they all do???
+1 raves
Tattooe... to moorrbr... July 28, 2009 03:51:53

I dont trust hillary either... same people really! but that would be HER job.. I hope it goes as well as Russia!!
+4 raves
Vincent Haan July 27, 2009 20:57:17

Answered: No. North Korea is a waste of time, I see no threat.
talking to those people is like talking to the wall. Its a waste of time.
+3 / -1 raves
god July 27, 2009 20:40:05

The US should nuke them if they won't get rid of their weapons
+2 raves
1oct1 July 27, 2009 20:36:46

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
It should be good...One guy is challenging the future of this country, the other is a nut from N. Korea. Yep, let them talk and maybe some good could come from it.
+4 raves
jking July 27, 2009 20:23:09

Yes we should talk to them it has to start somewhere, but I would not chose Obama to be the one to talk with them. He’d probably start out by saying the America is sorry for sticking our noise in their business
SAILOR July 27, 2009 20:04:40

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
What they have been doing isn't working.
+1 raves
largo1 July 27, 2009 19:55:41

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
If we don't take the time to discuss thing we could end up in another senseless war. Not saying we will achieve peace but we have to try.
+1 raves
mk, Smartass Oracle July 27, 2009 19:47:10

Answered: No. North Korea is a waste of time, I see no threat.
The 6 party talks is the only way to go. North Korea is just acting childish
+1 raves
Cloudburst July 27, 2009 19:42:46

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Kim maybe a xenophobic bastard, but talking to him should be a start.
+1 raves
aherbert July 27, 2009 19:40:05

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
Yes talk to little Kim hehe .... he need validation .... you know what happens when you ignore someone .... they will do a Palin and keep popping up when not exspected ...

No one want to be surprise by the likes of him ...
+1 raves
helenros July 27, 2009 19:34:49

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
Kim Jong Il is an idiot, but he's an idiot with big weapons. We need to do something to attempt to neutralize the threat.
+2 raves
the Griffin July 27, 2009 19:27:50

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
As Winston Chruchill said in 1954 . . .

"To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war."

War should be the last resort of desperate men and nations.
Camille July 27, 2009 19:21:57

I think the North Koreans are a bunch of blow-bags, always trying to s~c~a~r~e the rest of the world with their stolen secrets.
Good to see you again, Senor. Hope all is well.
+1 raves
Jester July 27, 2009 19:21:43

He can, but it will yield ZERO tangible results.
goodogcarl July 27, 2009 19:21:12

Answered: Yes. Obama should go one-on-one with North Korea.
how can we not? sure, kim jong il's a nut . . . but i would rather he not launch a nuclear missile at hawaii.
+1 raves
Keen ToJones July 27, 2009 19:19:02

How rational and seriously democratic can one go in to a country that is making nazi germany look like a play ground?
AGPhillbin to Keen To... July 28, 2009 00:41:48

"Democratic?" what has "democratic" got to do with the question? Since when does "democratic" enter into diplomatic contacts? And exactly how is North Korea worse than Nazi Germany? How many million people have they killed, and how many countries have they conquered? I don't have to hang a picture of King "Dear Leader" Kim (and his predecessor, King "Great Leader" Kim) on my wall to know enough not to spout off about Nazi Germany every time I see some autocratic ruler.