"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."

irish 2010/12/14 13:33:02

Monday, December 13, 2010

"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."

december 13 2010 bound obey unconstitutional law courts bound enforce
Dees Illustration
Marti Oakley, Contributing Writer

Activist Post

Washington D.C., known more these days as the “district of criminals”
commits so many crimes each day as a collective body that a moratorium
on government should be declared until we can clean this nest of
globalists, these kissers of corporate butts who seem more determined to
protect their own private interests than protecting our country from
obliteration by global cabals.

As congress moves forward with plans to end our sovereignty, as they
collude with foreign interests to take our jobs, to destroy our culture
and to subject us to international laws and agreements harmful to us as
a nation, we need to remember who we are. We are not globalists; we
are Americans. We are not “citizens” of some new world… We are not a
collection of mindlessly identified numbers and codes, biometric
identifiers, or mindless sheep that don’t understand what is being done
to our nation.

We are the greatest society to have ever existed. WE ARE AMERICANS.

greatest threat America faces on a day to day basis are those who
masquerade as protectors and defenders of the American people. D.C.
has long since ceased to be of any value to the public although
corporations and the obscenely rich find a home away from home in this
ten square mile district.

We are also standing on the edge of a precipice and if we don’t stand
up and collectively demand a return to, and an affirmation of, who we
are and what has bound us together for more than 200 years, we will be
driven over the edge into an unimaginable abyss.

As congress continues its daily deluge of anti-American legislation,
its un-American activities, bear in mind that just because congress said
it, doesn’t make it so. Consider this opinion of the Supreme Court:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by
legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the
land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the
land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is
impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid;
one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the
form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the
time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so
branding it.
An unconstitutional law, in
legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.
Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as
it would be had the statute not been enacted.
an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it
imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no
power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no
acts performed under it . . .
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.
An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.
Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
-- Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256)
this in mind when your friends and family, or your elected officials
tell you that “it’s the law, you have to." If that law is arbitrary to
the constitution, if it renders you subject to illegal or
unconstitutional laws and acts it is in fact, null and void. Keep this
in mind when the courts rule in favor of corporate interests knowingly
violating the rights and protections afforded the people as described
in the Constitution. Almost without exception, every law that has been
passed by one administration and congress after another in the last
twenty years has substantially violated and reduced the rights of

One of the gravest mistakes made by Americans today is the mistake of
assuming that because congress passed a piece of legislation and the
president signed it, the violations of rights and liberties, the
assaults on the American people under the guise of [national security]
or other created crisis are justified or legal.

You have guaranteed rights only so long as you defend them from encroachment by the government.

Oakley is a political activist and former op-ed columnist for the St
Cloud Times in Minnesota. She was a member of the Times Writer’s Group
until she resigned in September of 07. She is neither Democrat nor
Republican, since neither party is representative of the American
people. She says what she thinks, means what she says, and is known for
being outspoken. She is hopeful that the American public will wake up
to what is happening to our beloved country . . . little of it is
Her website is The PPJ Gazette
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest

  • Striker 2010/12/15 16:02:00
    The problem here is that we have long subjected ourselves to this "system", not necessarily by any specific agreement to abide, but by "going along to get along", meaning we prefer not spending our lives in jail.

    Thus the "rule of law" is a bullsheet con. It is never our law, it is their law. We have never consented to any of those, except under duress.

    This cannot change until and unless people get over the notion that we must be governed. The true spirit of individual voluntary participation has become quite unpopular. So sad.
  • irish Striker 2010/12/15 16:38:12
    you are right! people fear the govt and prison!
  • Striker irish 2010/12/15 16:46:24
    Yep, that's the big CON.
  • irish Striker 2010/12/15 16:50:00
    sickening. did you hear about the guy who was killed by the cops in florida?? a neighborhood snitch called 911 and said he was sitting outside with a gun. he was on his porch watering the lawn or neighbors lawn and they shot and asked later. family is pissed as all hell.
  • Striker irish 2010/12/15 16:53:09
    good reason to be pissed !
  • irish Striker 2010/12/15 16:59:17
    yep! gun happy cops all too ready to respond to snitching! this is going too far!
  • Autarchic 2010/12/14 13:42:24
    No one needs to have a court to declare it as unconstitutional. It is up to us to make our own determination on whether it is or not!
  • irish Autarchic 2010/12/14 13:44:33
    "The willingness to accept the penalty for breaking the unjust law is what makes civil disobedience a moral act and not merely an act of lawbreaking."- martin luther king

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2016/02/06 00:27:47

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals