Quantcast

Nightmare scenario?

Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/10/02 00:24:59
Related Topics: Facts, Voter Fraud
Yes. This is dangerous.
No. Nothing to see here. Move on.
Hey--you never know.
You!
Add Photos & Videos
An activist puts three facts together. Any one of them would be uncomfortable. Taken together, he says: Nightmare.

Number one: dead people still on the voter rolls, and the incumbent's shills say that those names should stay.



Number two: voter fraud is still going on, and is ridiculously easy.



Number three: executive orders. Especially this one.

Is this adding up to a plot to seize power permanently?

Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/10/01...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Dwight 2012/10/16 15:05:55
    No. Nothing to see here. Move on.
    Dwight
    1; Just because there are dead people on the voter roles does not mean they actually vote. In fact there is no indication that they did. It is a red herring.

    2; There is no proof that voter fraud has ever happened in any significant numbers.

    3; The Executive order is the same one that is signed by every President. It just explains the "chain-of-command". I freaked out when Bush signed one just like it.
  • S. Gompers 2012/10/03 17:01:01
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    S. Gompers
    +1
    The dead shall rise again!!!
  • dr blais 2012/10/03 04:20:08
  • Næthan Æterna 2012/10/02 21:30:24
    Hey--you never know.
    Næthan Æterna
    +1
    IF I were a betting man, I'd bet that more fraud goes on than what is being recorded.
  • CHUCK 2012/10/02 20:55:57 (edited)
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    CHUCK
  • dr blais CHUCK 2012/10/03 04:24:56
  • CHUCK dr blais 2012/10/04 00:20:33
    CHUCK
    +1
    I LIKED SARAH NO GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE ON A NATIONAL LEVEL,,LOOK AT ALL THE ONES THAT DO
    ANY WOMAN THAT CAN PUT DINNER ON THE TABLE WITH A RIFLE CAN T BE ALL THAT BAD....ROMNEY WONT LISTEN TO COMMON FOLK..

    Photobucket
  • mk, Smartass Oracle 2012/10/02 19:10:01
  • dr blais mk, Sma... 2012/10/03 04:21:01
  • dr blais dr blais 2012/10/03 04:21:46
  • sbtbill 2012/10/02 19:03:45
    Hey--you never know.
    sbtbill
    +1
    I'm sure there is some from both sides. My guess is it is a lot less of a problem then dishonest county clerks
  • Magus BN-0 2012/10/02 18:50:02
    No. Nothing to see here. Move on.
    Magus BN-0
    +1
    The issue it's "dead people on the voter rolls", but the fact that Republicans are falsely claiming that many people are dead in order to remove actual voters from the rolls. And no, voter fraud is not happening. Republicans are lying about voter fraud to aid in their voter suppression effort.
  • Næthan ... Magus BN-0 2012/10/02 20:45:02 (edited)
    Næthan Æterna
    +1
    Wait, you just said that voter fraud is not happening, yet Republicans are lying to purposely remove actual voters and using other voter suppression tactics? Um, this is pretty obvious, but that sounds like voter fraud.

    It is a real thing, look into Acorn more.
  • mich52 Næthan ... 2012/10/02 21:24:14
  • Næthan ... mich52 2012/10/02 21:28:12 (edited)
    Næthan Æterna
    +1
    Ah, yes, still fraud, but yes. What I find interesting, and this is just my thought here, people will commit any crime: I saw someone steal a shoelace once, for no reason. They did it just to do it. What is stopping the Human Race from committing more fraud, on any account, than what is actually recorded?

    You know, like the amount of rapes claimed vs. the amount of rapes actually committed--sort of like that. I don't believe there's a huge amount of voter (in general) fraud, but I don't think there's only been 10 cases in the last however many years.
  • mich52 Næthan ... 2012/10/02 22:08:33
  • Næthan ... mich52 2012/10/02 22:16:03
    Næthan Æterna
    Whatever the case, fraud reduction or vote suppression, I certainly DON'T want another Government Agency birthed to create and enforce these supposed voter I.D. cards.
  • Temlako... Næthan ... 2012/10/02 22:18:13
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    No need for that. The Division of Elections would handle it.
  • Magus BN-0 Næthan ... 2012/10/03 00:14:11
    Magus BN-0
    Voter suppression is completely different from voter fraud. Voter fraud means creating fake votes to be counted. Voter suppression means preventing people who wouldn't vote for you from voting at all.
  • Næthan ... Magus BN-0 2012/10/07 18:37:17
    Næthan Æterna
    +1
    I know the difference. I was only saying that I want neither and I certainly don't think another Government Beuracracy is the answer...
  • Lanikai 2012/10/02 17:49:57
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    Lanikai
    +1
    Anyone not bright enough to SEE clearly that this man is a dictator WAITING to seize power is a moron.
  • Indigo Minded 2012/10/02 16:59:01
    Hey--you never know.
    Indigo Minded
    +2
    Zombies vote Obama

    and we think the dead have no say in this election. You people are necrophobes...
  • SimpleAmerican BN-0 2012/10/02 15:42:58
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    SimpleAmerican BN-0
    +3
    Years ago, I was an election official (election judge) and during a break for coffee and elderly lady approached me and told me to look outside at a table set up by Acorn, in violation of precinct and polling center rules not allowing any partisan activity within site of the polling station. When I approached them, they had pieces of mail on the table and when I asked them what they were for they began packing up. The elderly lady said they were handing out pieces of mail for people to use to "prove" their identity and address inside the poll center. It occurred to me the mail I saw were utility and phone bills, which at the time could be used, but your name still had to be on our list as registered. Well if people have mail from the precinct that the person who rightfully owned the mail was registered, the person with the illegal mail could vote. In the same day, several hours later a person appeared only with a piece of mail, the name on the utility bill did not show up on the voter list. However, my democratic counterpart, against the law, asked the person who they were going to vote for. When the person replied the Dem ticket, he said I can register you right here. I had to object and we had to call in the party attorneys, I also called the Sheriffs office. The man in question fled, but several others were taken to jail for having "stolen" US mail in their possession. So this happens all of the time!
  • iamco2000 2012/10/02 15:35:31
    Hey--you never know.
    iamco2000
    +1
    EO 11051 was actually signed: September 27, 1962 by JFK and is actually no longer even in effect:

    Executive Order 11051
    Prescribing responsibilities of the Office of Emergency Planning in the Executive Office of the President

    Signed: September 27, 1962
    Federal Register page and date: 27 FR 9683; October 2, 1962
    Amends: Proc. 3279, March 10, 1959; EO 10242, May 8, 1951; EO 10260, June 27, 1951; EO 10296, October 2, 1951; EO 10312, December 10, 1951; EO 10346, April 17, 1952; EO 10421, December 31, 1952; EO 10427, January 16, 1953; EO 10480, August 14, 1953; EO 10494, October 14, 1953; EO 10529, April 22, 1954; EO 10582, December 17, 1954; EO 10601, March 21, 1955; EO 10634, August 25, 1955; EO 10660, February 15, 1956; EO 10705, April 17, 1957; EO 10737, October 29, 1957; EO 10789, November 14, 1958; EO 10900, January 5, 1961; EO 10952, July 20, 1961; EO 10958, August 14, 1961
    Revokes: EO 9981, July 26, 1948; EO 10219, February 28, 1951; EO 10269, July 6, 1951; EO 10438, March 13, 1953; EO 10461, June 17, 1953; EO 10524, March 31, 1954; EO 10539, June 22, 1954; EO 10638, October 10, 1955; EO 10773, July 1, 1958; EO 10782, September 6, 1958; EO 10902, January 9, 1961
    Amended by: EO 11075, January 15, 1963; EO 11556, September 4, 1970; EO 12046, March 27, 1978
    ...






    EO 11051 was actually signed: September 27, 1962 by JFK and is actually no longer even in effect:

    Executive Order 11051
    Prescribing responsibilities of the Office of Emergency Planning in the Executive Office of the President

    Signed: September 27, 1962
    Federal Register page and date: 27 FR 9683; October 2, 1962
    Amends: Proc. 3279, March 10, 1959; EO 10242, May 8, 1951; EO 10260, June 27, 1951; EO 10296, October 2, 1951; EO 10312, December 10, 1951; EO 10346, April 17, 1952; EO 10421, December 31, 1952; EO 10427, January 16, 1953; EO 10480, August 14, 1953; EO 10494, October 14, 1953; EO 10529, April 22, 1954; EO 10582, December 17, 1954; EO 10601, March 21, 1955; EO 10634, August 25, 1955; EO 10660, February 15, 1956; EO 10705, April 17, 1957; EO 10737, October 29, 1957; EO 10789, November 14, 1958; EO 10900, January 5, 1961; EO 10952, July 20, 1961; EO 10958, August 14, 1961
    Revokes: EO 9981, July 26, 1948; EO 10219, February 28, 1951; EO 10269, July 6, 1951; EO 10438, March 13, 1953; EO 10461, June 17, 1953; EO 10524, March 31, 1954; EO 10539, June 22, 1954; EO 10638, October 10, 1955; EO 10773, July 1, 1958; EO 10782, September 6, 1958; EO 10902, January 9, 1961
    Amended by: EO 11075, January 15, 1963; EO 11556, September 4, 1970; EO 12046, March 27, 1978
    Revoked in part by: EO 11725, June 27, 1973
    Revoked by: EO 12148, July 20, 1979
    See: EO 10995, February 16, 1962; EO 11030, June 19, 1962; Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1958; Memorandum of February 9, 1962; EO 11610, July 22, 1971; EO 11725, June 27, 1973
    NOTE: See Public Law 94-412 (90 Stat. 1255; 50 U.S.C. 1601), which terminates, effective September 14, 1978, all powers and authorities, except those expressly cited, possessed by the President and/or other Federal officials as a result of any declaration of a national emergency in effect on September 14, 1976

    http://www.archives.gov/feder...

    Grace to you, Glory to God!
    (more)
  • ZenerSix 2012/10/02 15:18:54 (edited)
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    ZenerSix
    +4
    The most important powers have already been seized. This plot isn't a secret but a fabulous cause called government and it goes all the way back to the copyright clause of the US constitution. It has since been gradually progressing with the passage of the Income Tax and Federal Reserve Acts of 1913, the 16th amendment, the New Deal programs of the 1930's, and the recent Patriot Act.

    Some people are comforted by the peace and order that the centralization of power brings. But history shows that governments never have enough power. They just keep taking it until there's nothing left.
  • Carol 2012/10/02 15:12:56
    No. Nothing to see here. Move on.
    Carol
    +2
    Even if you tell a lie often, it still does not make it. True.
  • mich52 2012/10/02 14:56:36 (edited)
  • Picasso's Cat 2012/10/02 14:39:59
    No. Nothing to see here. Move on.
    Picasso's Cat
    +2
    First of all, dead people have never elected anyone to any office.
    Second, there is no plot, if there were we would still have the same president we had in 1970. What we do have is manipulation of the issues and illusions for voters to be amazed at.
    You know why there is little being done to take dead people off the voter registration rolls ???????
    Becaues that's what they want you looking in too!!!
    And why you are spending your time doing that, they know you will be keeping your nose out of the real issues that affect America, like both democrat and republican parties being corrupt and an independent candidate being needed to restore America back to her roots.
    Manufactured problems for stupid people to investigate, while the two party logic put's yet another dumbass in office.

    fools
  • Freedom... Picasso... 2012/10/02 15:47:01
  • dispatcher 2012/10/02 14:29:35
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    dispatcher
    +4
    Voter FRAUD IT'S THE LIBERAL THING TO DO. LIBERAL MORONS VOTE FOR OBAMA
  • mich52 dispatcher 2012/10/02 15:04:17
  • dispatcher mich52 2012/10/02 15:16:05
  • mich52 dispatcher 2012/10/02 15:31:34
  • Magus BN-0 mich52 2012/10/02 18:51:28
    Magus BN-0
    +1
    They're not naive at all. They're just lying.
  • mich52 Magus BN-0 2012/10/02 21:21:09
  • Yo'Adrienne..AFCL 2012/10/02 13:36:15
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    Yo'Adrienne..AFCL
    +5
    This aspect of the election is the one that scares me the most.......bundled with the fact that the votes are going to be counted in SPAIN....and the ARMED FORCES aren't getting their Absentee ballots in time..........This voter fraud thing is BIG!!!!!! and it's the ONLY way that Ovomit might win!
  • WGN 2012/10/02 13:18:41
  • Angel 2012/10/02 13:07:28
    Yes. This is dangerous.
    Angel
    +5
    NC alone had 35,000 dead voters still voting...
  • Dwight Angel 2012/10/02 13:39:35
    Dwight
    what if the link to that story?
  • Lanikai Dwight 2012/10/02 17:52:19
    Lanikai
    +1
    http://www.charlotteobserver....

    From the Charlotte Observer.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/23 13:43:15

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals