Quantcast

Newsweek Hack Attacks President Obama, But Leaves Actual Facts On The Cutting Room Floor

ProudProgressive 2012/08/20 16:09:29

It's been many years since Newsweek could be called a bastion of journalistic professionalism, but of late they seem to be slipping closer and closer to the fantasy world of such smear sites as The Blaze and WorldNetDaily. This week the Right Wing, overjoyed at the mere thought of something that will distract the American public from the ongoing saga of Mitt Romney's tax problems, are drooling over a poorly researched and openly biased hit piece against the President from sometime "historian" and long time Right Wing mouthpiece, Niall Ferguson. Of course, Ferguson doesn't bother with "facts", but that has become the Right Wing norm.

Article excerpt follows:

Krugman Calls Out Niall Ferguson For Making Things Up
By Susie Madrak
August 20, 2012


Krugman is pretty ticked off at conservative historian-for-hire Niall Ferguson for a "plain misrepresentation of the facts, with an august publication letting itself be used to misinform readers." He wonders if Newsweek will call for an apology. (Yeah, I'm sure it's coming right up.)

In the past, Krugman has called the Harvard professor a "poseur" who, when it comes to economics, "hasn't bothered to understand the basics, relying on snide comments and surface cleverness to convey the impression of wisdom. It's all style, no comprehension of substance."

I have to agree. Ferguson's area of expertise is history, but frequently opines on economics, and has a long-standing feud with Krugman. As anyone who follows his frequent pronouncements knows, Ferguson is frequently wrong - and I haven't seen an apology yet. (Fun trivia fact: The Times reports that Ferguson encouraged Paul Ryan to run for president!)

There are multiple errors and misrepresentations in Niall Ferguson’s cover story in Newsweek — I guess they don’t do fact-checking — but this is the one that jumped out at me. Ferguson says:

"The president pledged that health-care reform would not add a cent to the deficit. But the CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation now estimate that the insurance-coverage provisions of the ACA will have a net cost of close to $1.2 trillion over the 2012–22 period."

Readers are no doubt meant to interpret this as saying that CBO found that the Act will increase the deficit. But anyone who actually read, or even skimmed, the CBO report (pdf) knows that it found that the ACA would reduce, not increase, the deficit — because the insurance subsidies were fully paid for.

Now, people on the right like to argue that the CBO was wrong. But that’s not the argument Ferguson is making — he is deliberately misleading readers, conveying the impression that the CBO had actually rejected Obama’s claim that health reform is deficit-neutral, when in fact the opposite is true.

More than that: by its very nature, health reform that expands coverage requires that lower-income families receive subsidies to make coverage affordable. So of course reform comes with a positive number for subsidies — finding that this number is indeed positive says nothing at all about the impact on the deficit unless you ask whether and how the subsidies are paid for. Ferguson has to know this (unless he’s completely ignorant about the whole subject, which I guess has to be considered as a possibility). But he goes for the cheap shot anyway.


Read More: http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/krugman-cal...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • zbacku 2012/08/20 16:23:36 (edited)
    zbacku
    +3
    Don't tell me you think that BORROWING Trillions is a good thing.
    Tell me one bank that you could walk into and ask for a $100,000 loan when you are already near bankruptcy that would NOT laugh in your face.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Che Guevara - Hero 2012/08/21 13:39:37
    Che Guevara - Hero
    People still read magazines ? lol
  • Tom Degan 2012/08/21 07:38:08
    Tom Degan
    +1
    I remember Paul Krugman three years ago saying that eight-hundred billion was hardly enough. We ignore this man to our own detriment.

    If I had been Barack Obama, the first words out of my mouth after taking the oath of office would have been these:

    "Get Krugman here on the double."

    I'm just sayin'.

    http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

    Tom Degan

    Tom Degan
  • LesWaggoner BN 1 2012/08/20 23:17:07 (edited)
  • scbluesman13 2012/08/20 23:09:19
    scbluesman13
    +2
    Krugman and Ferguson's private feud aside, Ferguson is simply a bloviating idiot. If you read any of his op-ed columns or listen to any of his interviews, what you hear is the same high-end, generalized austerity rhetoric you hear from the neocon nutters in the house and senate. Not that I agree with everything Krugman says, but he's usually pretty good at giving examples and providing historic scenarios to back his claims. And he was right about the stimulus. Krugman's original projections to get a working stimulus was closer to 1.3 Trillion to start, and that we'd probably need a second one of at least 1 Trillion. He had also advised to lessen the tax cuts in the stimulus packages, and focus more on infrastructure and public works. Something he's been saying from the very beginning. An economy won't stimulate and grow if you don't spend. Austerity measures with no means of permanently increasing revenue or adding permanent growth to the economy will simply throw our country into a double-dip recession, and more likely a depression.
  • luvguins 2012/08/20 18:38:43
    luvguins
    +2
    That is what happens when a history professor tries to be an economist and fails. He is foolhardy to take on Paul Krugman, recent winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics since Ferguson's predictions have been wrong since 2004.
    http://www.businessinsider.co...
  • Redneck Gal 2012/08/20 18:28:47
    Redneck Gal
    +2
    This is very typical of Republicans these days. What I find sad is that sooo many people on that side automatically believe this shtuff without bothering to check the facts. Paul Krugman is not only a Professor at Harvard, he's also Pulitzer Prize winner in Economics. He really does know his stuff!!
  • maggiemay 2012/08/20 17:06:16 (edited)
    maggiemay
    LOL newsweek obama must go
  • cutter's falls 2012/08/20 16:31:06
    cutter's falls
    +1
    I read alot of your posting, but this one I stopped after I read the Blaze is a smear site
    while I don't have GBTV or subscribe to his website, I do find it laughable you attached such a tag as "smear site"
    case in point,
    he's this week out at the Navaho Reservation helping to hand out food
    maybe it's next week he will be there
    but yaknow, I betcha Goerge would like Glen Beck
    you heard of Goerge eh? he's the fellow that lives in a hut, obama brother
    I heard obama talking about being "your Brother's Keeper"
    proud progressive, did you know glen an bunches of volinteers filled semi trucks full of food an sent them out all over the nation.
    some even found the places where in America you can be ticketed,or arrested for feeding the poor?.
    like I said I stopped reading after I read "smear site"
    and on a side note of sorts
    Hi Gorge! goerge obama
    share your address Goerge,
    and I'll send some venison Jerky
  • zbacku 2012/08/20 16:23:36 (edited)
    zbacku
    +3
    Don't tell me you think that BORROWING Trillions is a good thing.
    Tell me one bank that you could walk into and ask for a $100,000 loan when you are already near bankruptcy that would NOT laugh in your face.
  • Redneck... zbacku 2012/08/20 18:25:19
    Redneck Gal
    +1
    Better re-read the piece...that's not what it said.
  • zbacku Redneck... 2012/08/20 19:51:34
    zbacku
    LOL. Krugman justifies borrowing a Trillion dollars because 'it's not as much as you think it is'.
  • Redneck... zbacku 2012/08/20 20:18:10
    Redneck Gal
    +2
    He justifies it because he thoroughly understands how economics work. The way FDR got things rolling after the great depression was through improving our infrastruction. Any moron knows that!!

News & Politics

2013/05/19 00:48:04

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals