New York City Public Schools Offering ‘Morning-After Pill’: Are You For it or Against it?
(▪‿▪)DoctorWhoGuru(▪‿▪)
2012/09/24 03:01:13
|
|
|||||
|
20 votes
|
|
39% | |||
|
31 votes
|
|
61% | |||
The New York City Department of Education has begun offering the so-called morning-after pill to students in a pilot program at 13 high schools across the city.
Read More: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/09/23/new-york-ci...






















Putting them in schools is a bit too far, in my opinion.
It SHOULD be paired with constant education and messaging about responsibility, of course.
I don't see how claiming it's the parent's job here negates the fact that the school should provide some back up.
Further, Plan B has a limited window of effectiveness...the time needed to get permission may render it useless.
As for this being different than standard birth control...that's true. But that doesn't make it at all similar to an abortion.
Schools are there to teach. My job is to parent.
A few pills costs less than a few million new people.
They can't even teach reading and writing!
On whether or not I think other teens should have access to it at school. I say no, because of age restrictions. Teens 17 and younger have to get a prescription for it. They say it's because you can't buy nicotine until age 18 and they didn't want to risk any lawsuits. The drug company said they were being very careful not to let 17 year olds have it. That would suggest the school would only be allowed to give it to 18 year olds, most of whom can drive, walk, or hitch a ride to a pharmacy or clinic. Morning after pills are pretty cheap and some clinics offer them for free. I don't think we should put more responsibilities on the school nurses who are all busy trying to keep the whole school on the medicines they require, and take care of the injuries and sickness on campus. Besides at age 18 you have to fill out an entire page front and back for 1 bottle of psudafed, so why is a progestin pill an exception to the no drug tolerance policy.