Quantcast

‘New Party’ Literature Suggests Obama Paid Dues to Join?

~ The Rebel ~ 2012/06/10 17:57:54
In the ongoing discussion of Barack Obama’s involvement with Chicago’s extremist “New Party,” online literature from the Party likely reveals that the young state senator not only was a member but had to commit financially to membership.

First, there’s a bit more background which is relevant here. Kurtz originally raised the question of Obama’s involvement with the New Party back in 2008. At the time, the campaign denied Obama was ever involved and referred to the allegation as a “crackpot smear.” Ben Smith, then at Politico, wrote a piece in which he quoted New Party founder Joel Rogers to the effect that Obama had never been a member of the New Party because the New Party didn’t have members.

On Thursday, Kurtz announced the discovery of new documents that supported his original claim. In particular, he found minutes of a 1996 New Party meeting which read:

Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.

Friday, Ben Smith conceded that this proves the White House was wrong when it claimed in 2008 that Obama had never sought an endorsement.

Read More: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/08...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • LADY LIBERTY SILLY WORDSMITH 2012/06/10 20:44:15
    LADY LIBERTY SILLY WORDSMITH
    +1
    NO SURPRISE, HE'S A MUSLIM COMMUNIST!
  • jackolantyrn356 2012/06/10 18:39:12
    jackolantyrn356
    +1
    The "NEW PARTY" is merely a Black Muslim sponsored Communist Cell.
  • Boris D. 2012/06/10 18:24:08 (edited)
    Boris D.
    +1
    He lied about his ties to these socialists, just like he lied about his involvement with ACORN.

    He taught Alinsky strategy for ACORN.

    He sued Citibank under Clinton's CRA, in a case that set precedent with ACORN threatening all the major lenders, on behalf of ACORN to force them to lower their credit requirements, alledging racism.



    Case Name

    Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

    Docket / Court 94 C 4094 ( N.D. Ill. ) FH-IL-0011

    State/Territory Illinois



    Case Summary

    Plaintiffs filed their class action lawsuit on July 6, 1994, alleging that Citibank had engaged in redlining (racism) practices in the Chicago metropolitan area in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. 1691; the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619; the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; and 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1982. Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant-bank rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, actual damages, and punitive damages.



    U.S. District Court Judge Ruben Castillo certified the Plaintiffs’ suit as a class action on June 30, 1995. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank,...






































    He lied about his ties to these socialists, just like he lied about his involvement with ACORN.

    He taught Alinsky strategy for ACORN.

    He sued Citibank under Clinton's CRA, in a case that set precedent with ACORN threatening all the major lenders, on behalf of ACORN to force them to lower their credit requirements, alledging racism.



    Case Name

    Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

    Docket / Court 94 C 4094 ( N.D. Ill. ) FH-IL-0011

    State/Territory Illinois



    Case Summary

    Plaintiffs filed their class action lawsuit on July 6, 1994, alleging that Citibank had engaged in redlining (racism) practices in the Chicago metropolitan area in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. 1691; the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619; the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; and 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1982. Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant-bank rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, actual damages, and punitive damages.



    U.S. District Court Judge Ruben Castillo certified the Plaintiffs’ suit as a class action on June 30, 1995. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 162 F.R.D. 322 (N.D. Ill. 1995). Also on June 30, Judge Castillo granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery of a sample of Defendant-bank’s loan application files. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 162 F.R.D. 338 (N.D. Ill. 1995).



    The parties voluntarily dismissed the case on May 12, 1998, pursuant to a settlement agreement.

    Plaintiff’s Lawyers Alexis, Hilary I. (Illinois)

    FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000

    Childers, Michael Allen (Illinois)

    FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000

    Clayton, Fay (Illinois)

    FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000

    Cummings, Jeffrey Irvine (Illinois)

    FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000

    Love, Sara Norris (Virginia)

    FH-IL-0011-9000

    Miner, Judson Hirsch (Illinois)

    FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-9000



    Obama, Barack H. (Illinois)
    FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000



    Wickert, John Henry (Illinois)

    FH-IL-0011-9000
    (more)
  • ~ The Rebel ~ 2012/06/10 18:01:54
    ~ The Rebel ~
    +1
    There's also a "Chapters & Members" page which gives a link if you want to "Become an At-Large Member." Here's the at-large member form which is addressed to the New Party headquarters in Brooklyn "ATTN: Membership Services." The form also notes that a one-time contribution of $36 is considered "basic membership." The "Jobs and Internships" page has a job listing for Executive Director which reads, "With close to 20,000 members and a growing staff (now 25), the organization is poised to elect progressive majorities in cities across the country..."

    What is evident looking at these old websites is that membership in the New Party was contingent on making a donation.

    That is spelled out even more clearly on this 1997 New Party web page titled "New Party Profile." It reads in part:

    The New Party is run by dues-paying members, who are organized into chapters. The national organization provides support for chapter growth and coordination. Every member gets one vote.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-...
  • ~ The Rebel ~ 2012/06/10 18:00:12
    ~ The Rebel ~
    +1
    The problem with this is that the New Party website--earlier drafts of which still exist in the internet archive--mention membership repeatedly and, as we'll see, even define what membership meant. Here's the 1999 version of the New Party website, specifically the "Join the New Party" page. Let me pull a few quotes that seem pertinent:
    •Transforming the face of American politics is a long, hard task. Your membership dollars can help us make each step of this process a reality
    •[T]he New Party's work depends on our members.
    •Most New Party members join as a monthly sustainer.
    •Sustainer pledges are automatically deducted from members' credit cards
    •All New Party members receive a free subscription to our quarterly newsletter
    •If you have any questions about the New Party that weren't answered on our site, or if you want to know if your membership is current, please contact our membership coordinator

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-...

News & Politics

2013/05/18 13:13:28

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals