The judge - who is a Muslim - should never have been allowed to become an American judge because his Muslim faith and 'Shariah law' supersedes U.S. Constitutional law in the Islamist mind.
If "we the people" do not act, we are doomed. Our freedom and country will be stolen by the 'murderous, religion of peace'.
MUSLIM VERSUS ATHEIST WHO WINS??? IN A US COURT; READ THE STORY AND MAKE YOUR OWN CONCLUSION, SHARIA HAS A US BIRTH-CERTIFICATE!
doc moto
2012/02/23 10:08:14
|
|
|||||
|
3 votes
|
|
27% | ||
|
1 vote
|
|
9% | ||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | ||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | ||
|
3 votes
|
|
27% | ||
|
4 votes
|
|
36% | ||
PENNSLYVANIA JUDGE ENFORCES SHARIA: MUSLIM ATTACKS, CHOKES MOE PARADE GOER, MUSLIM JUDGE RULES AGAINST VICTIM
This is why anti-sharia legislation is so essential.
Back in October, I reported on a parade goer wearing a “Zombie Muhammad” costume while marching in a local Pennsylvania Halloween parade. He was viciously attacked and choked by a Muslim (enforcing the sharia, no doubt.)
According to reports, the Parading Atheists of Central Pennsylvania (PACP) were marching in a Halloween parade in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania,when a Muslim stormed out of the hometown crowd to assault one of the marching atheists who happened to be wearing a Zombie Muhammad costume.Today, a Muslim judge in Pennsylvania ruled on the caseand sided with Muslim and said the victim would be put to death in Muslim societies for his "crime."
Judge rules against atheist attacked in costume ABC local (hat tip Armaros)
MECHANICSBURG, Pa. (WHTM) -It almost sounds like the makings of a joke: an atheist, a Muslim and the Mechanicsburg Halloween parade. But non-believers aren't laughing about an attack and insist what's really frightening is the way a district judge ruled on it.
The Atheists of Central Pennsylvania decided to walk in the Mechanicsburg Halloween parade. There was a zombie Pope and a zombie Muhammed. On YouTube, you can catch a scary moment. It's dark and distorted, but a Muslim man comes off the curbextremely offended at Muhammed being depicted in this way.
"He grabbed me, choked me from the back, and spun me around to try to get my sign off that was wrapped around my neck," said Ernie Perce, who donned the costume.The Muslim man and Perce both called police to report a crime. Both kept walking, and a few blocks down found Sgt. Brian Curtis. He talked to both and came to this conclusion.
"Mr. Perce has the right to do what he did that evening, and the defendant in this case was wrong in confronting him," he said.
Talaag Elbayomy was charged with harassment, but District Judge Mark Martin threw it out after criticizing Perce, the victim, and even calling him a "doofus." The audio is also on YouTube.
(((MORE ON THE SITE REFERENCE BELOW; PLEASE COMMENT AND LETS BE NICE, IF WE CAN!)))
Top Opinion
-
FPSRules 2012/02/25 06:23:38
If "we the people" do not act, we are doomed. Our freedom and country will be stolen by the 'murderous, religion of peace'.
My criticism deals with the fact that Muslim's indeed view Shariah Law above our own law.
This judge lectured the victim. Whether he was a jerk or insensitive to the Muslim man's religion or not is irrelevant to the offense the Muslim man committed. The (atheist) as well as anyone else, can make fun of whomever they want. If he slandered the man, the man could have sought legal redress himself.
The fact is, it's usually the Christian who is the victim of religious bigotry. But, that does not give the Christian or anyone from any other faith the right to attack another citizen under our law. No one, from any religion has any more or less rights than any other citizen.
Mine is a simple point. This judge went right to his Islamic faith - not the law - and lectured the victim of the assault. This was prejudicial and totally improper for him to inject his own religious beliefs into the case. This is my objection.
Can you imagine if the Iranian court, (where the "religion of peace" is incorporated into their government),was lectured about Christ's love ...
My criticism deals with the fact that Muslim's indeed view Shariah Law above our own law.
This judge lectured the victim. Whether he was a jerk or insensitive to the Muslim man's religion or not is irrelevant to the offense the Muslim man committed. The (atheist) as well as anyone else, can make fun of whomever they want. If he slandered the man, the man could have sought legal redress himself.
The fact is, it's usually the Christian who is the victim of religious bigotry. But, that does not give the Christian or anyone from any other faith the right to attack another citizen under our law. No one, from any religion has any more or less rights than any other citizen.
Mine is a simple point. This judge went right to his Islamic faith - not the law - and lectured the victim of the assault. This was prejudicial and totally improper for him to inject his own religious beliefs into the case. This is my objection.
Can you imagine if the Iranian court, (where the "religion of peace" is incorporated into their government),was lectured about Christ's love and forgiveness?
Do you suppose they would have compassion on the Christian pastor facing the death penalty under Islamic law and not put him to death?
Yes, that is Iran and they apply their own rules. But, this is America and our laws rule supreme.
I thank you also for your attention and consideration doc.
Enjoy and remember to pass Carl's teaching on! Have a great day!
(((YES, Shame on the difference in religious tolerance and the lopsided Justice!)))
I don't like the atheist's actions, but in OUR country, where the American Constitution rules supreme, all people have a right to express themselves.
No, you certainly can't yell "fire" in a theater if there isn't one, but this incident - regardless of how offensive it is to anyone - does not permit, under OUR law, the offended party to physically attack the offender.
This, is exactly what occurred.
Most religion's have, and continue to be, verbally attacked, ridiculed in movies and TV in the U.S. and abroad.
Christian's today in some cases, must seek a court injunction in some states, just to remind local authorities that they (Christians) don't forfeit their rights as American citizens just because of their faith; in spite of what the ACLU claims.
The link below has been 'CLEANSED" from the web apparently....I tried to play it again and...LOW and BEHOLD, it won't play! What a mystery. Try anyway.
www.wnd.com/2012/02/atheist-c...
Wake up America! Lets bring our Troops HOME, Vote Ron Paul!
(((NOTE: I purposely spell muslim with a small 'm' and same with islam and islamic 'i' and many times 'c' for christian as I do not give any CAPS to the minors things in LIFE, Christ and if your gave your LIFE, then you are a Christ-ian... Sorry, it is just moto, making a statement...
I spell those with a lowercase letter as well. I also spell any other god besideds God with a lowercase "g." God is the only one that deserves recognition, and no, He is "not" the same "god" as allah. Allah is not peaceful or loving like God is. I do spell Christian with a captial "c," but we must be careful who we call "Christians." I grew up catholic, thinking "that was the only way to live." I loved my "religion." I did not love God. That's the problem with a lot of "religious" people, and why I don't say I'm "religious." I am married to Christ, and that is what makes a Christian.
I heard the judge's own words, and his obligation is to administer American law, whatever the decision, and not be influenced by the Muslim man's religious sensitivities. Christian's - are routinely harrassed, and the constant butt of ridicule - but get no such allowances by society, courts or judges.
You'll notice there were no Catholics acting out as a result of the atheist's "FREE SPEECH" activities as he ridiculed their Pope.
Number 1-Because of this, the muslim man "could" have acted out...however, he did not-he just yelled at the atheist man.
Number 2-the was a case based off of harassment-not assault (the police officer charged him with that-not the judge)
Number 3-there was no evidence supporting the muslim man harassing the atheist.
If anything the atheist harassed the muslim man. He has even been kicked out of his atheists of Pennsylvania group because he was too provoking. If he wasn't provoking, then why would he randomly pull out his cell phone, and record himself screaming "I am the prophet mohammed rising from the grave" right in front of the muslim? He "wanted" to get a reaction out of the muslim man. The atheist used to be a Christian, but since he never took his son to the hospital, hoping that God would heal his son, his son became deaf. He has a vengeance towards any religion because of it.
and number 4-any good judge makes a lecture. The judge knows what the atheist is capable of, and knew that he was in the wrong for doi...
Number 1-Because of this, the muslim man "could" have acted out...however, he did not-he just yelled at the atheist man.
Number 2-the was a case based off of harassment-not assault (the police officer charged him with that-not the judge)
Number 3-there was no evidence supporting the muslim man harassing the atheist.
If anything the atheist harassed the muslim man. He has even been kicked out of his atheists of Pennsylvania group because he was too provoking. If he wasn't provoking, then why would he randomly pull out his cell phone, and record himself screaming "I am the prophet mohammed rising from the grave" right in front of the muslim? He "wanted" to get a reaction out of the muslim man. The atheist used to be a Christian, but since he never took his son to the hospital, hoping that God would heal his son, his son became deaf. He has a vengeance towards any religion because of it.
and number 4-any good judge makes a lecture. The judge knows what the atheist is capable of, and knew that he was in the wrong for doing this, and because of this lectured the man, trying to educate him. You really need to see "both" sides of the story before making accusations. That is something that the American media is horrible at. Negativity sells because Americans are selfish and don't care about anyone else. My dad was dead on when he said that.
And the reason Christians don't react is because in the Bible, we are told to turn the other cheek. You'll find a lot of us don't do that, and start burning korans or abortion clinics, but those are the "religious" Christians-not the ones who have a "relationship" with Jesus Christ. There's a HUGE difference. I'll save that for another story though.
I'm sorry for my stubborness, but, as reported in the media and as the trial revealed, this judge crossed the line by interjecting his personal beliefs and empathizing with the defendant.
If he in fact dismissed the case strictly on the law and merit, then so be it.
LISTEN to the president and then change your thinking; he says what it is and that is it, it appears and we must celebrate what he wants and we have to do as he says, because he said so and that settles that, eh? The man is muslim and islamic president... He is not Liberal, he is pass that! He is not a progressive, way out there, He is a muslim!!!
I wish I had his talents! I would hang around the Whitehouse.
Joey Belladonna, the lead singer of heavy metal band Anthrax
Justin Bieber, a Canadian singer and actor
Jack Black, an American comedian, actor, and musician
James Bond, a fictional character in the film series James Bond 007
Jeremy Borash, an American professional wrestling personality
Jonas Brothers, an American band consisting of Joe Jonas, Nick Jonas, and Kevin Jonas
John Bush, the lead singer of heavy metal band Armored Saint
JB, a South Korean singer