Muslim Group Seeks to Ban Sharia Law in America

In Oklahoma, courts are debating whether citizens have the right to
ban Sharia law. And in Michigan, a group of Muslims have actually come
out in strong opposition to Islamic law in America.

In the case of Oklahoma, a 2010 ballot initiative
put a stop to considerations of Islamic laws in making state court
decisions. The measure, which passed by a 70 percent margin, was
challenged by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). The
group claimed that the initiative was a direct violation of the
Constitution’s Establishment Clause. ABC News has more:

Now, a panel of judges from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals will
decide whether a lower court was right to block the ballot initiative.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) joined CAIR in challenging
this anti-Sharia measure.

In a separate debate, the American Islamic Leadership Conference
(AILC) recently announced support for a Michigan bill (HB 4679) that
would prevent state judges from utilizing foreign laws. This, to the
surprise of some, would include Sharia law. This group, comprised of
Muslim adherents, is opposed do any state court decisions that would
conflict with American law. In an official release, the group writes:

As American Muslims, we believe that the law should treat
people of all faiths equally, while protecting Muslims and non-Muslims
alike from extremist attempts to use the legal instrument of shari‘ah
(also known as Islamic jurisprudence, or fiqh) to incubate,
within the West, a highly politicized and dangerous understanding of
Islam that is generally known as “Islamism,” or “radical Islam.”

In the statement, the group also claims that it sees no problem with
the law and that it will not, as some would likely charge, hamper the
rights of Muslims. Additionally, the AILC opposes the “fear mongering”
it claims more radical groups are undertaking here in America, writing:

As American Muslims we are conscious of the fact that
Muslim Brotherhood legacy groups and other Islamists and their
surrogates in the U.S. are trying their best to portray any opposition
to manifestations of shari‘ah law as “racism” and “discrimination
against Muslims.”

According to the Huffington Post,
Manda Ervin, who signed on to the release and who heads the
Maryland-based Alliance of Iranian Women, explained why she’s opposed to
Sharia law here in America:

“Many of us fled the Muslim world to escape Shariah law…We do not wish these laws to follow us here.”

But not all Muslims agree with state laws that would officially
forbid Sharia compliance. Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im, a law professor at
Emory University in Atlanta, has the following to say about initiatives
like the ones currently being debated in Oklahoma and Michigan:

“It‘s fearmongering and it’s reckless. It’s ridiculous
that state legislatures are wasting time on a law that tells judges to
do what they are already constitutionally bound to do anyway.”

Michigan and Oklahoma are not alone. More than 20 states are
examining laws that would ban Sharia in courtrooms. It is important,
however, to understand that each of these laws have a different focus.
While some explicitly point out Islamic law and solely target its
tenets, other proposals — like the one in Michigan — more broadly target
foreign laws. The AILC has come out in support for latter but not the
former.

For more of this story, go here:

-- So what say you, do you agree with their effort to ban Sharia Law? Do you think it is Constitutional? Would love to hear some opinions.