Quantcast

Much vindicated climate scientist Michael Mann to sue 'National Review' for vile defamatory article.

Icarus 2012/08/23 23:26:31

July 22nd, 2012:

In response to the latest in vile and disgusting attacks on climate science and scientists, Paleo-Climate expert Mike Mann today served the once-long-ago-useful-now-ridiculous National Review with the letter demanding a retraction and apology. The letter can be viewed below, or on Mike’s Facebook page, where you may choose to spread it around.

Part of the offensive piece, which compares Dr. Mann to sexual predator Jerry Sandusky, is reproduced here.

This recent slime fest marks the latest in the long decline of what once was the brave attempt to build a respectable intellectual underpinning for modern conservatism. William F. Buckley, I’m quite sure, would puke.

The letter crafted by Dr. Mann’s attorney promises to “pursue all appropriate legal remedies”.

Get popcorn.

August 23rd, 2012: Michael Mann write:

  1. People have been asking for my reaction to the recent response by the National Review. Here is a statement from my lawyer John B. Williams of Cozen O'Connor:

    ********
    The response of the National Review is telling with respect to the issues it did not address. It did not address, or even acknowledge, the fact that Dr. Mann’s research has been extensively reviewed by a number of independent part...
    ies, including the National Science Foundation, with never a suggestion of any fraud or research misconduct. It did not address, or even acknowledge, the fact that Dr. Mann’s conclusions have been replicated by no fewer than twelve independent studies. It did not deny the fact that it was aware that Dr. Mann has been repeatedly exonerated of any fraudulent conduct. It did not deny the fact that it knew its allegations of fraud were false. Rather, the National Review’s defense seems to be that it did not really mean what it said last month when it accused Dr. Mann of fraud. Beyond this, the response is little more than an invective filled personal attack on Dr. Mann. And further, this attack is coupled with the transparent threat that the National Review intends to undertake burdensome and abusive litigation tactics should Dr. Mann have the temerity to attempt to defend himself in court.
    *********

    We intend to file a lawsuit.
    Excellent news. The architects and perpetrators of the global warming denial scam need to be taken to court and thoroughly defeated. Then perhaps we can get started on serious measures to combat global warming.

Read More: http://climatecrocks.com/2012/07/22/mike-mann-call...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Magus BN-0 2012/10/16 01:18:30
    Magus BN-0
    +1
    When they can't dispute the science (which is always), they try smears instead.
  • Icarus Magus BN-0 2012/10/16 07:16:21
    Icarus
    +1
    Exactly.
  • RogerCoppock 2012/08/26 07:30:40
    RogerCoppock
    +2
    IT IS ABOUT TIME!

    The science deniers need to be taken to court. Creationists, tobacco lobbyists, anti-environmentals, and global warming deniers, who defame the reputations of hard working scientists with stupid conspiracy theories need to pay.
  • Icarus RogerCo... 2012/08/26 13:32:01
    Icarus
    +1
    I couldn't agree more, Roger.
  • Kirino 2012/08/24 00:38:22
  • Icarus Kirino 2012/08/24 07:01:06
    Icarus
    +2
    Precisely. Thanks for your perceptive comment, Rainbow Dash.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 08:19:54

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals