Mothers Hiring Professional Birth Photographers: Reasonable or Ridiculous?
SodaHead News
2012/06/18 00:48:28
|
|
|||||
|
122 votes
|
|
27% | |||
|
334 votes
|
|
73% | |||
Forget the days of dad or other family members snapping photos in the delivery room. Now, a growing number of women are turning to professional photographers to document the miracle of childbirth.
In recent years, the birth photography industry has really taken off. They even have their own professional organization, the International Association of Professional Birth Photographers, which has roughly 400 members.
According to The New York Times, professional birth photographers charge anywhere from $700 to $1,900. That’s pretty pricey. But then again, these photographers do have to be available to come rushing to the hospital at a moment’s notice.
So, you may be wondering: How graphic do these birth photos actually get? Apparently, that’s a pretty common question.
Briana Kalajian, a co-owner of Shoots and Giggles Photography, told The New York Times, “People will ask if I’m going to take the National Geographic birth photo. They ask it in 10 different ways.”
The answer: During delivery, most photographers choose to stand near the mother’s head unless a crowning shot is specifically requested.
Dr. Randi Hutter Epstein, author of “Get Me Out: A History of Childbirth from the Garden of Eden to the Sperm Bank,” blames celebrity culture for the desire to turn childbirth into a photo shoot.
“There is a lot of pressure to not just cherish the birth experience but to promote it as this beautiful thing,” she said. “Then you’re going to get into your skinny jeans the next day and have a beautiful photograph of you looking absolutely beautiful and well rested with your perfect-looking baby, like all the celebrities.”
Now before you run off to find a professional birth photographer of your own, please keep in mind that many hospitals ban cameras from the delivery room.
So Sodaheads, what do you think about mothers hiring professional birth photographers? Reasonable or ridiculous?
In recent years, the birth photography industry has really taken off. They even have their own professional organization, the International Association of Professional Birth Photographers, which has roughly 400 members.
According to The New York Times, professional birth photographers charge anywhere from $700 to $1,900. That’s pretty pricey. But then again, these photographers do have to be available to come rushing to the hospital at a moment’s notice.
So, you may be wondering: How graphic do these birth photos actually get? Apparently, that’s a pretty common question.
Briana Kalajian, a co-owner of Shoots and Giggles Photography, told The New York Times, “People will ask if I’m going to take the National Geographic birth photo. They ask it in 10 different ways.”
The answer: During delivery, most photographers choose to stand near the mother’s head unless a crowning shot is specifically requested.
Dr. Randi Hutter Epstein, author of “Get Me Out: A History of Childbirth from the Garden of Eden to the Sperm Bank,” blames celebrity culture for the desire to turn childbirth into a photo shoot.
“There is a lot of pressure to not just cherish the birth experience but to promote it as this beautiful thing,” she said. “Then you’re going to get into your skinny jeans the next day and have a beautiful photograph of you looking absolutely beautiful and well rested with your perfect-looking baby, like all the celebrities.”
Now before you run off to find a professional birth photographer of your own, please keep in mind that many hospitals ban cameras from the delivery room.
So Sodaheads, what do you think about mothers hiring professional birth photographers? Reasonable or ridiculous?
Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/us/now-in-the-de...
Top Opinion
-
melly~thwarting Satan since... 2012/06/19 14:57:46Reasonable
For possibly the parents, and for their own private viewing, pictures they take on their own should be just fine. But hey, if someone wants to waste their money on it, that's their choice.
New born:
older baby:
I would not want to see it in a house, on a pad for a mouse, or in a frame, I do not want to see it I claim!
I do not want to see it large, I do not want to see it small, I do not want to see it at all!
I do not want to see it on your desk, i quite frankly, think its grotesque!
I would not like to see it FatherLiberty, and I think more than half agree with me!
I personally would not went any photos snapped.
because everyone wants to remember the graphic images of those times.
I worked at a company. A woman's daughter had a child and she had pictures. The first picture was the baby. She walked over to me (she was a proud grandma) and said want to see picture of my grandbaby. I said sure. Well the 4th picture was a picture of the birth. It was nasty. The last thing I expected to see that day was a teenage girl giving birth.
Her response? I guess I should take those out. I said yup pretty much.