Quantcast

Mothers Hiring Professional Birth Photographers: Reasonable or Ridiculous?

SodaHead News 2012/06/18 00:48:28
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Forget the days of dad or other family members snapping photos in the delivery room. Now, a growing number of women are turning to professional photographers to document the miracle of childbirth.

In recent years, the birth photography industry has really taken off. They even have their own professional organization, the International Association of Professional Birth Photographers, which has roughly 400 members.

According to The New York Times, professional birth photographers charge anywhere from $700 to $1,900. That’s pretty pricey. But then again, these photographers do have to be available to come rushing to the hospital at a moment’s notice.

So, you may be wondering: How graphic do these birth photos actually get? Apparently, that’s a pretty common question.

Briana Kalajian, a co-owner of Shoots and Giggles Photography, told The New York Times, “People will ask if I’m going to take the National Geographic birth photo. They ask it in 10 different ways.”

The answer: During delivery, most photographers choose to stand near the mother’s head unless a crowning shot is specifically requested.

Dr. Randi Hutter Epstein, author of “Get Me Out: A History of Childbirth from the Garden of Eden to the Sperm Bank,” blames celebrity culture for the desire to turn childbirth into a photo shoot.

“There is a lot of pressure to not just cherish the birth experience but to promote it as this beautiful thing,” she said. “Then you’re going to get into your skinny jeans the next day and have a beautiful photograph of you looking absolutely beautiful and well rested with your perfect-looking baby, like all the celebrities.”

Now before you run off to find a professional birth photographer of your own, please keep in mind that many hospitals ban cameras from the delivery room.

So Sodaheads, what do you think about mothers hiring professional birth photographers? Reasonable or ridiculous?

Professional Birth Photographer

Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/us/now-in-the-de...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • John Hall 2012/06/18 12:56:01
    Reasonable
    John Hall
    +1
    To each his own .
  • Wulfdane 2012/06/18 12:43:56
    Ridiculous
    Wulfdane
    +5
    All these pictures will end up on Facebook....
  • OhPuhleze Wulfdane 2012/06/18 14:51:26
    OhPuhleze
    +2
    oh please no.
  • i00wattz 2012/06/18 12:26:32
    Ridiculous
    i00wattz
    +2
    oh, and here is a picture of little jr. crowning! isn't the top of his little head, surrounded by a vagina just so cute?
  • SavageS0ul 2012/06/18 11:37:40
    Reasonable
    SavageS0ul
    +1
    So, it's acceptable for weddings, but not the birth of children?.... They're both at the top of the list. I don't see a HUGE deal. It's odd, but we're just not used to it. :-)
  • Cal SavageS0ul 2012/06/19 00:28:40
    Cal
    Weddings don't usually come with the associated risk of infection lol.
  • Swan Eshdeh 2012/06/18 11:19:28
    Ridiculous
    Swan Eshdeh
    +2
    you are talking seriously ??!!
  • MiSsGlOoMyBeAr 2012/06/18 10:59:34
    Ridiculous
    MiSsGlOoMyBeAr
    +2
    i dont think the baby will want to open that Photo Album and see his/her mom's legs wide open! UGH! god that's just plain creepy!
  • maryam 2012/06/18 10:05:38
    Ridiculous
    maryam
    +2
    No , it should nt be published in any kind of media .
  • aneed2know 2012/06/18 09:51:02
    Ridiculous
    aneed2know
    +2
    yeah just what every family reunion needs photos of a gaping VaJay and the things that come out of it. I have seen too children born, and besides the sheer joy i had seeing them being born, i can honestly say its not something you want reminded of at every family gathering.
  • Pinball Wizard 2012/06/18 09:31:19
    Ridiculous
    Pinball Wizard
    If they got the cash to dish out, call me & I'll shot any photos they want.
  • Mark 2012/06/18 09:26:29
    Reasonable
    Mark
    It's upto them. Personally, I think they are barking
  • HarleyCharley 2012/06/18 08:38:43
    Ridiculous
    HarleyCharley
    +1
    give me a break...
  • Rob Williams 2012/06/18 08:34:52
    Ridiculous
    Rob Williams
    Get your feet in the stirrups and smile!
  • JayLynx 2012/06/18 08:23:21
    Reasonable
    JayLynx
    Why not? By the way, who's paying for?
  • Dzeeng 2012/06/18 08:17:21
    Ridiculous
    Dzeeng
    how she eat,defecate shoot this ,measure must be
  • Soms Cougli 2012/06/18 08:16:00
    Reasonable
    Soms Cougli
    It's their money, and if the photographer is willing to do it, sure, go for it. Some people love recording every second of the birth of their children; I would if I were to have kids, because currently I can't, so if it ever happened I would love to have images of every moment. What does it matter?
  • Aksana 2012/06/18 07:13:21
    Ridiculous
    Aksana
    +2
    ridciculous
  • JoeM 2012/06/18 06:56:41
    Ridiculous
    JoeM
    +3
    Too ridiculous, on too many levels to comment on. 5,10,20 years later, who will want to see these pix? Extra distraction and possible infection in the OR??

    Are these people nuts?
  • Pele Emerging 2012/06/18 06:33:00
    Ridiculous
    Pele Emerging
    +6
    I think it's totally nuts. What are you going to do? Invite the neighbors over for "See me have the baby" instead of vacation slides?

    When I gave birth to my daughter, the doctor told me that my husband could have a camera or video camera. "No, he can't, " I replied.

    The doctor assured me that the hospital permitted both.

    I looked him in the eyes and said, "But *I* do not!"
  • Cal 2012/06/18 06:19:18 (edited)
  • Pele Em... Cal 2012/06/18 06:39:48
    Pele Emerging
    +3
    I second all the things you said. I had three c-sections: One emergency due to fetal distress and two repeats (one after a trial labor). I was awake for the third. My then husband also was there. He was given a chair to sit on by my head and told to stay there, but he was allowed to stand up when they took the baby out. They also warned him that he was not a priority, should he faint and fall off the chair. He'd been a USAF medic, and fortunately, had a strong stomach. It was thrilling for both of us to see our daughter right after they removed her from me. I didn't need pictures then, and I don't need them now to remember or cherish the experience. My daughter is 26. Her birth is still engraved on my memory. Thinking that you need a picture or video is totally asinine. Some things need to be remembered; not recorded.
  • Cal Pele Em... 2012/06/18 06:42:40
    Cal
    +2
    Oh was it in a USAF Hospital? My facility is USAF. I'm an USAF enlisted Surgical Tech.
  • Pele Em... Cal 2012/06/18 12:27:03
    Pele Emerging
    +1
    My sons were both born in USAF Hospital in Wiesbaden, Germany before it closed. Ex was out of the air force when daughter was born.
  • sglmom Cal 2012/06/18 13:50:17
    sglmom
    +1
    You make good points here ..
    after the birth .. I needed to be stitched up .. (oh, yes indeed .. )
    and I wasn't even thrilled at my spouse (who is an ex-spouse shortly afterwards)
    being in the delivery room .. he was rushed out as I and the child were distressed ..
    My children .. definitely had some medical issues right after birth ..
    so yes, no one extra .. not even the former spouse was allowed in there ..
  • Cal sglmom 2012/06/19 00:27:06
    Cal
    +1
    Yes, lots of stitches. Last night we used about 12 needles in total. That's the nice part (well...for me anyways). lol. That's the part of the surgery where it calms down and usually me and the Doc can chit chat haha.
  • Dave The Canuck 2012/06/18 06:05:48
    Ridiculous
    Dave The Canuck
    +4
    Silly. The parents can take memorable photos of the birth themselves.
  • Mrs. Kathy Arch 2012/06/18 05:50:58
    Ridiculous
    Mrs. Kathy Arch
    +4
    Not for me, thank you. Anyone can do what they want, but if I'm blessed with a child, I would prefer to keep that moment for my future husband and myself.
  • Wyveryx 2012/06/18 05:49:40
    Ridiculous
    Wyveryx
    +3
    $700?!? The hell with that, just buy a $5 disposable and enjoy the moment with your significant other. The doctors have to be there, baby paparazzi do not.
  • jaydenvdv 2012/06/18 05:42:26
    Ridiculous
    jaydenvdv
    +2
    I think it's just a little over the top. Really is there nothing we wont spend our frikin money on?
  • lavadream97 2012/06/18 05:38:43
    Ridiculous
    lavadream97
    +3
    really now -_-
  • ~HopelessRomanticM17~ 2012/06/18 05:33:40
    Ridiculous
    ~HopelessRomanticM17~
    +3
    More like gross.
  • Depsycho 2012/06/18 05:26:41 (edited)
    Ridiculous
    Depsycho
    +3
    .... ew....

    I'm so glad my mother declined photography of ANY kind during the birthing process. I find it disgusting. I definitely wouldn't be happy with my mother if she decided to shoot photos of me as a wailing bundle of fresh wet flesh.

    Not to mention at THAT price. EFF that! There's better uses for money in THOSE amounts.
  • Nikki Zoe Salamander 2012/06/18 05:22:16
    Ridiculous
    Nikki Zoe Salamander
    +2
    Cant she just get someone to tae pictures?
    And anyway you WILL remember that day til you die. No need for disturbing? pictures. lol
  • Sean McDonald 2012/06/18 05:16:12
    Ridiculous
    Sean McDonald
  • Lord Emperor of Dune 2012/06/18 04:58:06
    Ridiculous
    Lord Emperor of Dune
    +3
    It is ridiculous, but I understand the desire to have pro pics of your child's first moment. HOWEVER, I don't want some bloke snapping the snapper, if you know what I mean haha
  • McCate Lord Em... 2012/06/20 02:56:33
    McCate
    LOL
  • starlight 2012/06/18 04:45:26
    Ridiculous
    starlight
    +3
    oh the family pics of the actual child birth was horrible enough i dont think putting the picture in black and white is going to make a stretched out vagina with a babys head look any better
  • Marcus Clark 2012/06/18 04:31:04
    Reasonable
    Marcus Clark
    +1
    This is totally reasonable. If they have the money and want to ensure they get the pics they want for the memories... go for it.
  • marylou5 Marcus ... 2012/06/18 06:57:20
    marylou5
    +2
    I think all hospitals have to put in place what is/could be life threatening and deny everyone!

    If you want to put the birth of your new baby in serious jeopardy because you must photo private parts, have at it....but don't sue the doctor when your baby dies with MRSA, introduced by the "visiting" public with camera!!

    Any non professional in the OR puts the mother and baby in jeopardy of infection.
    I guess you can always show photos of your dead baby, as it was being born in the OR" !

    Given my druthers, I prefer to take a live baby home!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 22:07:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals