Most Americans will not be voting for Obama in 2012...will you?

good for you..enjoy it as he has three years left and then he will head on back to ChiTown

I certainly will enjoy him while he serve, no matter how long it may be. Evidently you will be living in misery for the next three years. That is a long time to live in misery. No matter who serve I wouldn't live in misery. Bush was in office and I did not live in misery. I certainly didn't like the way he ran the office.

very good

It does help to use words we all understand. Pres. Obama doesn't go by Hussein, so clearly you are intending the confusion.

That is the problem on this site...People should get their heads out of their asses and when you vote...vote for the best person..whether it is a dem or repub...

Wow! Now you know why we are in the mess we are in. People who just don't care about their fellow man or have nothing else to say! I wonder how she will feel with Sharia law, all kind of restrictions of freedom and stone to death if do not comply with their rules! It happens when people are not afraid of the Higher Power of God!

Icion, Sean Hannity said the right thing - if it's only one poll showing the results then yes I might agree with you. But if 5 + polls indicate who leads it indicates the truth. Very good example is Scott Brown in Mass. You wee in denial about him leading???? Oh well.. he won because most polls showed so.

Obama is out in 2012, Sarah Palin is in.

Palin needs to stay in Alaska. She will be called a dumb uninformed woman if she steps into the presidential race. It's no way under God green earth she will come close to winning in 2012.

Sarah out in 2012 and will stay out. Obama is in if he decides to run.

Icion, Sean Hannity said a right thing: 10 polls can not lie. Good example is Scott Brown in Mass (bless his heart for winning LOLOL). 6 different polls showed him leading (six, not one!) and he won.

Hussein is out of the office and Sarah Palin is in!! Duhhh!

The country would be better off with no President than with resigned-Gov. Palin. The fact that she resigned her current position under fire is suggestive of the limits of her dedication. Watch out for her Vice Presidential candidate, since that person is likely to be in charge when she gives up in confusion should she win.

We don't know the real reason of her resignation. You can speculate whatever you want.

I know she IS a strong leader. She and her family have been harassed for a long time. Who would like that???? After all, no matter how good the job is her family makes a first priority.

She is very popular and will remain such until 2012.

Hello No.

No. Canada is starting to look good! Did you ever notice how Americans are never happy about anyone they vote for? There is always something wrong with the guy or gal when they are elected. A lot like the fact that Americans need to have an enemy or we just don't know what to do with ourselves. We invent an enemy whenever we need one, and for now it is Obama. Who's next I wonder?

they have Universal health care in Canada way to go Cappy

Pelosi????

God Damn she is a good looking Ho

So now you show that you are not only bigoted, but sexist too. Are we supposed to cheer and pat you on the back? I like it better when you keep these small minded, ignorant remarks to yourself and you offer actual arguments. Once in a while, you actually do get around to saying something interesting when you are not just making ad hominum attacks.

Naaahhhh ... she is out of the picture Thanks God. LOL

Only If his V.P. is Ted Kennedy !!!

Let's dig that piece of shit up and let him go for it...

I most certainly WII NOT! NO, NO NO.

Well, depends on who's running. I said I'd definitely support McCain in 2008, but then a little obscure Illinois Senator came in and won my support.

Funny how leftists can always be counted on to go left.

Funny how centrists can get their hearts broken to see right-wingers corrupt and demonize a long-standing statesmen who should have run a middle-of-the-road campaign in 2008.

Our system of getting folks elected needs some repair. The party politics really do seem to get in the way of finding good people to run, and when we do pick a good one, the party ties him up in promises he cannot keep once reality strikes. Senator McCain was a very respectable American hero in my mind before he ran for President; but that image took a blow when he caved into the party's agenda and methods.

Mind blowing consistency, like water to the sea

You can watch them drive too..they always leave their left turn signal on..blink, blink, blink

No, I will not vote for Obama in 2012

YES! This brave man has taken on the worst that we could deliver. I expect a robust opposition that represents people. What I see is an aimless opposition and devious movement to oppose at all cost. To move U.S. all out of the much and mire, we should push forward with all of our might along with the President that has taken many first steps in FAITH.

As for the Coakley/Brown race, I do not think that the people of Massachusetts will vote "NO" to everything instead of "YES" to desperately needed something, the way of the tea parties.

Is there any order Obama could give that you would not follow?

I am a , 1969-1970, vietnam veteran i followed of many i thought were mislead for once we have some one thinks rather than just react to mis-information

Quite a number of possibilities come to mind. I have no trouble saying no when I have a reason to say no, but I don't think a President would give me an "order" of any sort anyway--a request maybe. And there are too many nay-sayers in power at the moment; what I see when I look at their reasoning is impoverished ethics-- social and economic goals incompatible with freedom and rights. A President's employees and the military must take his orders or risk their careers. Some things are worth risking one's career for. I would not take an order to kill civilians even at the point of a gun (but then again, I'm not likely to receive such an order and circumstances do contribute to real decisions).

very good

Absolutely no. Didn't vote for him the first time. A person with only 5 years experience obtain the highest office in the nation was for one reason only..he is the puppet of the democratic party mainly Pelosi and Reid. The democrats have taken the American people for a ride for the greed and power. He was not voted in for the good of the mainstream America. I can see that the teaparties that are forming is getting stronger to take the country back to to mainstream America. I have been a democrat all my life when the Dems stood for mainstream but it seems their focus now is to take control of the American people.

No, I didn't vote for him the first time, and I definately will not vote for him the next time.

In 2012 I am voting for a different "Change". Common Sense.

Well said

No I did not vote for him the first time and would not if I had the chance again... All politics aside, Obama has tried to change many things most people do not agree with and that is wrong on his part. Promising transparentcy and changing the way goverment (pork) does business sticks out as failure on his presidency. Obama promised his followers many other things but in spite of Dems controling both House and congress, did not deliver on many of them. Let me ask those who supported him, did you think he was voted in to change America in the things he has done? That my fellow American would change the America of the last 200 years...

Very well said Kip! Bravo! BO wants change for socialism ... No, thanks, ... it's not at all what American people want to have.

I'd certainly vote to change what America stood for 200 years ago: slavery, destruction of native peoples, no rights for women, etc. etc. Pres. Obama has made tremendous differences in the missions of government offices, humanizing policies and prohibiting torture; that no-only-voting Republicans have dragged their feet and insisted on a weird 60 person vote rather than simple majorities in the Senate have slowed the President's agenda, but not because he isn't trying to do as he promised he would TRY to do. Would you know how to make any of these changes in the face of an uncooperative Congress?