
Morgan Freeman: "Obama Is Not America's First Black President": Agree?
Fef
2012/07/09 05:12:25
|
|
|||||
|
241 votes
|
|
63% | |||
|
144 votes
|
|
37% | |||
Morgan Freeman does not consider President Barack Obama "America's first black president." The Oscar-winning actor black actor told NPR's 'Tell Me More' host Michel Martin:
NPR.ORG reports:

First thing that always pops into my head regarding our president is that all of the people who are setting up this barrier for him ... they just conveniently forget that Barack had a mama, and she was white — very white American, Kansas, middle of America," Freeman said. "There was no argument about who he is or what he is. America's first black president hasn't arisen yet. He's not America's first black president — he's America's first mixed-race president.
NPR.ORG reports:
The Oscar-winning actor known for films such as The Shawshank Redemption and The Dark Knight talks about his latest project, The Magic of Belle Isle, and his interests outside film — including presidential politics.

Read More: http://www.npr.org/2012/07/05/156212527/morgan-fre...
Top Opinion
-
darcie lamar 2012/07/09 05:23:45Agree, Obama's not the first black president.






















For example, despite the best efforts of America's vast Right Wing Herd, Obama's health plan is the law of the land.
Isn't it weird how traitorous Right Wing Scum constantly try to damage America?
Oh . .. . you mean the Triumph of Affordable Health Care.
Thank God for the wisdom of President Obama and the Democrats.
I am all for patient protection and affordable health care.
It will benefit us in numerous ways.
http://www.healthcare.gov/law...
Let's see a reputable source for your 2 trillion figure.
What is the cost of ObamaCare? ObamaCare, also known as the American Health Care Plan, is said to have a massive cost for the American government and is estimated at up to $2 trillion dollars in the next 10 years.
Summarizing the failures of President Barack Obama's 2,700-page healthcare bill in 400 words is no simple task. But here are some of the reasons why it is fatally flawed—and why it must be repealed.
For starters, the law is driving up costs. President Obama promised to reduce annual premiums by $2,500 per family, but those premiums have actually risen by $2,393, and Obamacare is expected to force them even higher.
Those costs don't even tell the whole story. There is a much bigger price tag—and that's what Obamacare is doing to our economy. The law is fiscally reckless and will only add to our nearly $16 trillion in debt. Worse still, it fails to address the long-term drivers of our debt crisis: the rapidly spiraling costs generated by entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The law is also undermining our economic recovery. Its complexity is causing tremendous uncertainty, and in the coming years, it will raise more than $500 billion in taxes. That's a toxic combination that harms investment and job creation. In fact, in one recent survey, 75 percent of small...
What is the cost of ObamaCare? ObamaCare, also known as the American Health Care Plan, is said to have a massive cost for the American government and is estimated at up to $2 trillion dollars in the next 10 years.
Summarizing the failures of President Barack Obama's 2,700-page healthcare bill in 400 words is no simple task. But here are some of the reasons why it is fatally flawed—and why it must be repealed.
For starters, the law is driving up costs. President Obama promised to reduce annual premiums by $2,500 per family, but those premiums have actually risen by $2,393, and Obamacare is expected to force them even higher.
Those costs don't even tell the whole story. There is a much bigger price tag—and that's what Obamacare is doing to our economy. The law is fiscally reckless and will only add to our nearly $16 trillion in debt. Worse still, it fails to address the long-term drivers of our debt crisis: the rapidly spiraling costs generated by entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The law is also undermining our economic recovery. Its complexity is causing tremendous uncertainty, and in the coming years, it will raise more than $500 billion in taxes. That's a toxic combination that harms investment and job creation. In fact, in one recent survey, 75 percent of small businesses said Obamacare is making it harder for them to hire.
As if Obamacare's fiscal flaws aren't enough, the president has also broken his promise that "if you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance." Instead, his law will force millions of Americans, including seniors, to lose the insurance coverage they have. And Obamacare puts the federal government between patients and their physicians—and empowers bureaucrats to make our healthcare decisions. Take the "Independent Payment Advisory Board" as an example. Through it, 15 unelected bureaucrats will effectively be placed in charge of Medicare—able to make cuts without consent from Congress or those who have paid into the system and rely upon it for their medical care.
Everyone agrees that our healthcare system faces significant challenges. The cost of coverage is too high and access to care is too low. But Obamacare does not solve those problems; it will only make them worse. The law must be repealed so that real reform—carried out in a transparent manner, consistent with the priorities of the American people, and capable of solving our healthcare challenges—can finally begin.
So in other words, you could NOT find a reputable source to support your 2 trillion dollar figure.
I am not surprised.
By the way, a shameless Right Wing Propaganda outlet like FOX "NEWS" is not a reputable source for anything.
. . . But even they did not mention a 2 trillion dollar figure.
Apparently, you just pulled that number right out of your big fat Lying Right Wing A$$.
Estimated Cost of 'Obamacare' Now $2.6 Trillion in First Decade ...
www.theblaze.com
http://www.businessinsider.co...
Obamacare to cost $2.6 trillion over first full decade | The Daily Caller:
Shall I go on? Its only getting worse fool!
And your source never mentioned a 2.6 trillion dollar price tag.
. . . The old bait and switch huh?
Why do you Right Wing Nut Jobs feel it's OK to routinely distort the facts?
Why do Right Wing Scum lie so much?
Why are they so disgustingly unprincipled?
Does anyone know?
But no reputable source mentions any 2.6 trillions dollar price tag.
And that's a fact.
I can't find a reputable source that mentions it and neither can you.
Here's a list of all the reputable sources that claim a 2.6 trillion dollar price tag for obamacare:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
zero
. . . And that's a fact.
H.R. 436, Health Care Cost Reduction Act of 2012
"June 5, 2012
As posted on the Web site of the House Committee on Rules (Committee Print 112-23)
Enacting the bill would affect both direct spending and revenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures apply. CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation estimate that those effects would increase the deficit by $2.2 billion in 2013 and $3.2 billion over the 2013-2017 period."
By the way, 2.2 billion dollars is over a thousand times less than the 2.6 Trillion dollar figure you claimed.
. . .LIAR
Or maybe you just exaggerated by a factor of a thousand.
The word of a Right Winger is worth NOTHING.
I always wonder why the Dems didn't go outright with a universal healthcare plan. I mean, taxing someone to contribute to a government plan is sound policy. Taxing someone for not purchasing from a private company? Well, I guess since climate control is continuing to screw up this country, when are we going to be forced to buy Chevy Volts? I hope someone in the NRA becomes president. Individual mandate for AR-15s. Good shooting!
And so this what I suggest for you little peon.
Pay you taxes, and try to be a good citizen for a change.
Do you think you can do that?
Why AR-15's? Are they any better than my old Ruger 223? They're the same caliber. But I notice mine can shoot a little off when it gets hot after firing a 30 round clip in quick succession.
I'm not sure I would favor a mandate to buy AR-15's.
And you think your wrote something that makes sense, don't you?
That is truly pathetic.
Maybe you shouldn't pretend to even think anymore, because your pretensions are self-evident.
Just give up thinking and immerse yourself in feeling. That's what being a Right Wing Extremist is all about . . . feeling, not thinking.
Feel the the pulsations of the Great Right Wing Hive Mind as it tells you to hate, and envy, and support the rich at the expense of all else.
Jeeeezus, what a scam !
I am sooooo glad I'm not anything like you.
Nothing ever changes, not the labels, nothing. You, and others who bicker back and forth and wave some partisan dick around like its going to change america have a lot to learn.
The next President may just wear Magic Underwear.
But the overall bill over time will be less than it would have been without the Affordable Care Act in place.
Most people already give enough of their income to the government to pay for taxes. After taxes there's barely enough left over to cover other necessities like car, rent, electricity and other more important things to worry about. Eventually, the people will run out of money to foot the bill. And then what happens?
Secondly, this law is supposed to give health care coverage to every citizen in the United States via other people's money. Why should MY money go and cover someone else's misfortune? Why should someone else's money go and cover my misfortune? What if some moron decides to cut himself and gets infected? Why should I have to pay for his ignorance? Not to mention some people who don't even pay taxes to begin with will get coverage. What about the people who simply refuse to work and be dependent on government all their life? I know several people who don't work because of unemployment payments and welfare and the like.
Thirdly, every other country that has already tried something like this is failing and has terrible health care. Take Cuba for example. They supposedly have the "best healthcare in the world" yet they are so poor. Just look at the devastating results of "universal healthcare" in Cuba. http://www.therealcuba.com/Pa...
I also know several people f...
Most people already give enough of their income to the government to pay for taxes. After taxes there's barely enough left over to cover other necessities like car, rent, electricity and other more important things to worry about. Eventually, the people will run out of money to foot the bill. And then what happens?
Secondly, this law is supposed to give health care coverage to every citizen in the United States via other people's money. Why should MY money go and cover someone else's misfortune? Why should someone else's money go and cover my misfortune? What if some moron decides to cut himself and gets infected? Why should I have to pay for his ignorance? Not to mention some people who don't even pay taxes to begin with will get coverage. What about the people who simply refuse to work and be dependent on government all their life? I know several people who don't work because of unemployment payments and welfare and the like.
Thirdly, every other country that has already tried something like this is failing and has terrible health care. Take Cuba for example. They supposedly have the "best healthcare in the world" yet they are so poor. Just look at the devastating results of "universal healthcare" in Cuba. http://www.therealcuba.com/Pa...
I also know several people from Canada and Britain who have been covered under universal healthcare. They say that by far the American system of healthcare before Obamacare is superior to their own country's healthcare.
US Citizens, especially high earners, have not been paying their fair share of taxes for three decades now.
Both Reagan and GW shamelessly bought votes by promising low taxes. As a result, revenue decreased drastically from what it otherwise would have been. Reagan TRIPLED the debt, which had never happened before except in wartime, and GW more than DOUBLED the debt again.
Republican politicians irresponsibly advance the notion that you don't have to pay taxes . . . that you can have your cake and eat it tool
Bull Sh*t . . . THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH
Get used to the idea.
I'm sick of Right Wing Greed causing this nation such tremendous damage . . . And I really do not care how much of a Christian you pretend to be.
As far as taxes go, we all pay for services we will never use. So what? Why don't you quit your incessant whining?
I never said Cuba had the best health care in the world. In the 2000 World Health Organization rankings, the US was ranked 37th overall and Cuba I think was 38th.
US high earners haven't paid their fair share in taxes? what would you consider "fair share?" 86% of all income taxes are paid by the top 25%. What about all the people who get a welfare check and food stamps and all these wonderful variety of other benefits and don't work, therefore don't pay a single cent? Why aren't you getting on these people's backs and tell them to pay their fair share of taxes? I've never heard anyone mention anything about the parasite welfare recipients who don't pay a single dime in taxes.
You forget that Ronald Reagan had the threat of the Cold War to deal with, so he increased the defense budget drastically.
As for GW, that guy is a fiscal socialist. Just because he was a republican doesn't mean he's all about no-spending. Our debt problem isn't because we haven't taxed enough, it's because we spend too much money.
I've never heard of any republican advocating the idea that you don't have to pay taxes. What is this rubbish you're bringing up?
And don't go attacking the Republicans in the assumption that, just because I oppose Obamacare, I'm a republic...
US high earners haven't paid their fair share in taxes? what would you consider "fair share?" 86% of all income taxes are paid by the top 25%. What about all the people who get a welfare check and food stamps and all these wonderful variety of other benefits and don't work, therefore don't pay a single cent? Why aren't you getting on these people's backs and tell them to pay their fair share of taxes? I've never heard anyone mention anything about the parasite welfare recipients who don't pay a single dime in taxes.
You forget that Ronald Reagan had the threat of the Cold War to deal with, so he increased the defense budget drastically.
As for GW, that guy is a fiscal socialist. Just because he was a republican doesn't mean he's all about no-spending. Our debt problem isn't because we haven't taxed enough, it's because we spend too much money.
I've never heard of any republican advocating the idea that you don't have to pay taxes. What is this rubbish you're bringing up?
And don't go attacking the Republicans in the assumption that, just because I oppose Obamacare, I'm a republican. You're sick of right wing greed causing damage to the country?
You should know that it's the conservative ideals of limited government, free enterprise, individual and states' rights, and popular sovereignty that made our country the wealthiest in the world.
I agree, that we may pay taxes for things we might never use. But what about the people who use such benefits but never pay taxes?
. . . And you have no idea of what you speak.
You, like most Right Wingers, want all the benefits of citizenship, without contributing your fair share. Taxes are necessary . . . you Parasite.
And income tax is just one tax. The lowest earners pay much more in excise taxes as a proportion of income then do high earners.
Ron Reagan was pawn of plutocrats. And he TRIPLED the national debt. His protege, GW Bush, doubled it again.
Neither Reagan nor Bush were at all fiscally Conservative. And they helped create a class of parasites and traitors, who call themselves "Conservatives" who don't think they have should have to pay taxes.
Plenty of Republicans don't want to pay taxes. That's the main Plank of the TEA Party . . . Taxed Enough Already.
Actually it is Liberal ideals of limited government, free enterprise, and individual and states' rights that made our country the wealthiest in the world. After all, the founding fathers were the Liberals of their time.
Do you seriously think that Liberals and Moderates oppose any of those things?
I don't know any Liberal or Moderate who opposes limited government, free enterprise, and individual and states' rights.
But you want good governance and government that works . . . not stupid governance dictated by ideological slaves.
No, we don't want to eliminate all taxes. We feel that people, individuals and businesses work better when taxes are lower, so that they have more money to invest in a new product or service or expand an already existing business. So that families have more money to spend on what they want to spend it on, to spend time with each other like going to a water park or watching a movie. Or maybe simply just pay bills. If they are taxed excessively, that means less money to pay bills or spend on their own wishes.
The main reason that Reagan spent a lot of money during his administration is to try to build up our Armed Forces so that we can combat the communist Soviet Union and, if was necessary, protect our land and people should an all-out war have risen.
Why are you attacking George Bush?
Answer: You are attacking the former President on the premise that I will come and try to defend him. I am not, nor will I. George bush was not a fiscal conservative in any way, shape or form. So, now that we have settled this, stop attacking George Bush because it doesn't matter what he's done.
Do you know what a parasite is? You must not have the slightest idea, do you? ...
No, we don't want to eliminate all taxes. We feel that people, individuals and businesses work better when taxes are lower, so that they have more money to invest in a new product or service or expand an already existing business. So that families have more money to spend on what they want to spend it on, to spend time with each other like going to a water park or watching a movie. Or maybe simply just pay bills. If they are taxed excessively, that means less money to pay bills or spend on their own wishes.
The main reason that Reagan spent a lot of money during his administration is to try to build up our Armed Forces so that we can combat the communist Soviet Union and, if was necessary, protect our land and people should an all-out war have risen.
Why are you attacking George Bush?
Answer: You are attacking the former President on the premise that I will come and try to defend him. I am not, nor will I. George bush was not a fiscal conservative in any way, shape or form. So, now that we have settled this, stop attacking George Bush because it doesn't matter what he's done.
Do you know what a parasite is? You must not have the slightest idea, do you? A parasite is someone who exploits others without doing anything in return. A parasite is someone who lives of government hand-outs all their life and don't pay a dime in taxes, while stuffing their face with beer and smoking marijuana all day long.
When the TEA Party people say "Taxed enough already" it doesn't mean we want to throw out all taxes. NO, we understand that taxes are necessary. It's because we are being taxed far too excessively. We are being taxed too much.
You're actually right. Liberals by definition do support small government and free enterprise, but you are not a liberal.
You, you're just a radical socialist who wants everything handed to you on a silver platter without doing anything to work for it, you lazy bum. Why don't you get out and stop living off of welfare and expecting the government to take care of you from cradle to grave.
“We feel . . . “
There you go. You have zoomed in on the quality that delineates right wing nut jobs and other extremists.
You “feel.” You don’t think. You feel. That is the most accurate observation in your entire post.
Obviously taxes are not arbitrarily established to annoy people. Taxes serve a purpose. They are this nations primary source of revenue. And without taxing at an appropriate level, this nation will NEVER balance the yearly budget, let alone pay down its debt.
And yes, lower taxes along with government spending (look up fiscal policy) can in fact stimulate the economy. But of course, there is a downside. High debt. Pretty simple, huh? We can’t focus on just stimulating the economy and ignore the harmful consequences.
That’s something that you Feeling people just can’t quite understand.
And yes, I know exactly what a parasite is. Ronald Reagan, GW Bush, and the irresponsible people who still mimic them are parasites.
Right Wing Nut Job...
“We feel . . . “
There you go. You have zoomed in on the quality that delineates right wing nut jobs and other extremists.
You “feel.” You don’t think. You feel. That is the most accurate observation in your entire post.
Obviously taxes are not arbitrarily established to annoy people. Taxes serve a purpose. They are this nations primary source of revenue. And without taxing at an appropriate level, this nation will NEVER balance the yearly budget, let alone pay down its debt.
And yes, lower taxes along with government spending (look up fiscal policy) can in fact stimulate the economy. But of course, there is a downside. High debt. Pretty simple, huh? We can’t focus on just stimulating the economy and ignore the harmful consequences.
That’s something that you Feeling people just can’t quite understand.
And yes, I know exactly what a parasite is. Ronald Reagan, GW Bush, and the irresponsible people who still mimic them are parasites.
Right Wing Nut Jobs are parasites. This generation, because of RWNJ influence, is parasitical.
We have built up a huge national debt because of RWNJ malfeasance, and now you FEELING PEOPLE refuse to do your duty as citizens and pay down that debt.
Instead, you choose to pass that debt, spiraling higher even now because of accumulating interest alone, down to future generations and let them deal with it.
YOU and your kind DEMAND that we parasitized future generations.
Do you know what I mean now ? . . . PARASITE
You parasites disgust me. And your grandchildren will look back on their RWNJ granddaddy with pure disdain.
I've said it many times before, and I'll say it again. The TEA Party and Conservatives know that taxes are important. They fund important things like police departments and build roads and whatnot. So don't tell me that that we think that taxes are not important. That is absolutely wrong.
It doesn't matter if we raise taxes to 100% on all people. That money will be spent by this socialist president within a year.
You want to balance the budget and pay off the debt? you start by cutting spending. We could cut all federal executive departments by 20%. We don't have a high debt because we don't tax enough. It's because we spend too much.
Before we even think about cutting taxes, we should cut spending. You don't cut your revenue before cutting spending. That will only lead to more debt and more borrowing from other countries. We should cut spending before taxes.
Ronald Reagan didn't want to create a nation of parasites. He wanted to get people off of welfare and get them to make money and support themselves, living independently of the government.
Conservatives are not parasites. We don't steal other people's hard earned cash and spend...
I've said it many times before, and I'll say it again. The TEA Party and Conservatives know that taxes are important. They fund important things like police departments and build roads and whatnot. So don't tell me that that we think that taxes are not important. That is absolutely wrong.
It doesn't matter if we raise taxes to 100% on all people. That money will be spent by this socialist president within a year.
You want to balance the budget and pay off the debt? you start by cutting spending. We could cut all federal executive departments by 20%. We don't have a high debt because we don't tax enough. It's because we spend too much.
Before we even think about cutting taxes, we should cut spending. You don't cut your revenue before cutting spending. That will only lead to more debt and more borrowing from other countries. We should cut spending before taxes.
Ronald Reagan didn't want to create a nation of parasites. He wanted to get people off of welfare and get them to make money and support themselves, living independently of the government.
Conservatives are not parasites. We don't steal other people's hard earned cash and spend it on our needs, while giving nothing in return. We want to make our own money and live independently from the Government. Thus, Conservatives are NOT parasites.
We don't want to quit giving taxes that are necessary to this country. We want fiscal responsibility and to cut excessive and unnecessary spending. Cutting spending is the first major step to cutting our debt. Lower taxes comes AFTER spending cuts.
It is the radical socialist who want to keep spending money we don't have giving illegal aliens who don't belong in this country a gold-plated medical insurance and education benefits. This reckless spending is what causes our debt.
Conservatives don't want the future generation of Americans to be ever more dependent on government hand-outs. We want our kids to be able to live independently from government. We do not want the next generation to be parasites.
So called pro-life people are those who DEMAND that GOVERNMENT has the right to COMPEL women to have Children whether they want to or not.
That is just wrong and un-American.
Hitler compelled women to have children too . . .whether they wanted to or not.
Jesus does NOT compel a woman to have a child.
Funny how they hate the government, but demand the government to mandate women be raped with intravaginal probes,
Funny how they hate the government, but they mandate that same government to kill those who did wrong.
Funny how their god is love, but they are happy to kill people with slightly different religion.
Funny how they are all for freedom, but don't think other people should have it.
Right Wing Nut Job "pro-lifers" demand that UNWANTED children must be born . . . . And then they completely abandon these helpless infants to fend for themselves.
Why do Right Wingers continually wreak destruction upon this nation?
Does anyone know?
The money and wealth is concentrated at the top, but those stupid election are in the way. So they create non-issues such as abortion and gay marriage in order for people to vote "Jesus", or for them. If those people realized what they are voting for, they wouldn't do that. But by voting Jesus, you can't be wrong, can you? Even if it takes your house away and kills you in the end.