More Details: "Obama's birth certificate was doctored" Arpaio

Good!

Because you, me and Sheriff Joe Arpaio ALL feel the same way...

That's why Arpaio created the "Cold Case Posse back in the early 1990s when he first got elected.

Whenever his constituents would ask him to investigate something that he thought might be a little bit nutty weird, strange, or at least, outside of the purview of what he thought the sheriff's department should be looking into, he would ask his volunteer staffed and donation funded "Cold Case Posse" look into the matter.

The only thing that Arpaio's department would do is allow the retired LEOs in the "Posse" to use the credentials of the department to get information from other agencies, other sources, etc. under the authority of their acting as unpaid deputies. Each of these volunteers was retired Law Enforcement Officers (LEO), detectives and/or attorneys. They would agree or disagree to investigate whatever issue that the Sheriff said that one or more citizens had asked the dept to look into.

In this case, the local Tea Party group presented the sheriff with a petition signed by over 250 county residents asking Arpaio to investigate the internet BC telling the sheriff that no official law enforcement agency had done that. Arpaio said he would do it only if his Cold Case guys agreed, but not with resources of the tax paid PD.

Bottom line, Arpaio did EXACTLY what you say you would hold your own local LEO's to do.

http://www.azcentral.com/ariz...

Yes, you would want your official to ignore THEM.. but what if the "nutty' person asking for something was YOU. What if you had a pet pieve that you thought needed investigating by the cops? What if you had even paid out of your pocket to have your pet project investigated, and the experts you hired said that you were right, and then the courts said your "experts" were not certified and wouldn't recognise their findings? Put yourself in the shoes of the nutty people! Sheriff Arpaio's volunteer "Posse" is the perfect way to placate the vocal nutjobs in your community while still serving the people that pay you... the county taxpayers.

Look at it this way. If YOU had asked your sheriff to look into something and he/she brushed you off, claiming you were a nutjob and looney, wouldn't you want to have an op/end letter in your local paper the next day telling the world how your elected official told you to take a hike? Sure you would!

With his Cold Case Posse, when a group of them ask him to do something, he can quietly have the volunteers do what they are asked and when they find nothing... when they find that the President's documents check out okay, Old Joe simply goes to them and shows them the findings and tells them that the birth certificate checked out. And that's what has gotten him elected over and over and over. Its called constituent service.

But what would YOU do if out of the blue, your group of retired investigators and attornies and court certified experts actually come up with "the smoking gun"... you know ... evidence that your district attorney says is enough to constitute "Probable Cause"... which under the 4th Amendment is a trigger for authorization of a full blown criminal investigation?

What would YOU do then? If you were the sheriff? If you ignore it... how many of those folks would know that YOU ignored a crime that they had uncovered and turned your back on it?

What would you do in that situation? Here's Joe's op/ed in the AZ newspaper: http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

It's obvious that you didn't watch the press conference nor have you seen the six video tapes. The sheriff wasn't the one that made the call that the investigation had sufficient evidence for labeling it as sufficient for 'probable cause' that a crime has been committed. What the sheriff DID do was NOT sweep it under the rug as has all preceding inquiries that were made by non-LEO investigations.

I'm sure that there are numerous issues that Mr. Arpaio has on his table including the FBI investigations, the Justice Dept. investigations, etc, etc. That's why when a group of Maricopa County constituents approached him with a petition signed by over 250 voting residents; he asked an independent group of former investigators and attorneys (nicknamed "Cold Case Posse") to look into the case. This was NOT the first time that these former cops and lawyers have helped out the county in investigating a case that could not warrant the county spending taxpayer money on pursuing. This group has volunteered their time, credentials and expertise in other situations where it was construed as such a 'dead' issue as not to justify the county spending time, money and resources on an investigation. That’s why they were called the “Cold Case Posse.”

But in this case, the Posse determined there WAS enough evidence to provide 'reasonable doubt' that the LFBC was genuine.

From there, the Posse took their evidence and suspicions to the county's legal advisors for a 2nd opinion and review of the allegations that the Posse had discovered. With the blessing of the legal dept., the matter was only then brought to Sheriff Arpaio who in turn, has brought this matter to the public's attention since all across the nation, various state ballot access authorities are filing the DNC's request for their guy to be on their respective state ballots.

How do you think you would feel if you were Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi right now and just two weeks after using the very document that supported your endorsement of Obama’s eligibility, you are told that a police investigation has debunked its content and has shown the LFBC to be a computer generated fabrication?

Mahili’s justification was that the “computer experts” in HIS court were not really experts as they were not certified. Now that the ‘certified experts’ used by the Posse… people that have a long history of court testimony in various states that recognized their skills, knowledge and abilities sufficient enough to be used by various police departments throughout the southwest have come up with the same conclusion that Judge Mahili chose to ignore, I just wonder what Mr. Mahili is thinking right now. Or what the Georgia Sec-State is thinking right now after having trusted in Mahili’s 10 page ruling that stated that Mahili “heard arguments” of the case… when only one party actually presented an argument, presenting effectively the same evidentiary documentation that the folks in AZ found.

Yeah, I’m looking forward to seeing how a Georgia judicial appeal will shake out now that the Posse’s data is in the public domain.
Oh, you might be interested in the part where Detective Zullo stated that the records for all inbound flight manifests for the year before and after Obama’s birth were examined and the only data missing was the week that Barry was allegedly born.
Watch the videos... or continue drinking the Kool-aide… your choice.

Time after time? Does that mean this has been before?

Are you saying that a law enforcement forensic analysis team, court certified forensic computer & electronic data storage experts have previously investigated this issue and had their findings & conclusion vetted by the legal staff of a county prosecutor’s office?

Really? Hmmm... Time after Time? Proven untrue? (Citation please)

In both this video and in the written testimony presented to Georgia's Judge Malihi, no such investigation has ever been performed by an official law enforcement investigative team. The only investigations performed have been by civilian and private investigators that were not authorized or certified by any officer of the court. As such each of these numerous attempts to testify were blocked by the WH instructing the judge that based on lack of standing, the plaintiffs application was unfounded.

Only in Malihi's court was such testimony permitted to proceed. And even Malihi's court was requested by the WH to not hear the case.

But Malihi's decision was to proceed was based on GA law that says that any GA voter has standing. And as we all know now, his subsequent ruling was based on that the claim that he didn't recognize the certification and expertise of the computer experts that were witnesses in his court.

And that was the reason why I asked you my "What if..." question to you, because now there IS court certified computer expert testimony claiming that the document is a fraud. (click here)

http://www.westernjournalism....

Watch the six 2min. videos on the process that the three former police detectives, the two retired attorneys, and their computer experts did to gleen the evidence that was then presented, vetted and approved by the Maricopa County Prosecutors office. When you are finished, please let me know if your basis is for presuming that these folks are just "flapping their gums" is still a valid assumption on your part.

REGARDING: Making any arrests - As explained in the presentation, the "Cold Case Posse's" authority to proceed was restricted by the fact that they were a volunteer organization operating without the funding of the taxpayer. Once this group of retired investigators discovered what they felt was the forensic "smoking gun" within the internet document, they immediately went to the county's legal staff in the prosecutor's office where in it became the opinion of the county prosecutor that the investigators had uncovered sufficient
"probable cause" to believe that a crime has been committed.

That's all that was presented and that's all that was claimed here by the Cold Case team.

None of these retired investigators have the authority to make any arrests, although they did indicate that they have enough data to they know which computer created the alleged birth certificate, but don't know who was sitting at that computer at the time when the alleged BC was fabricated.

Again, please watching their presentation, please let us know if you still feel that these are still just "more unspecified allegations from an incompetent investigating team"

Thanks! AV