Mitt Romney made a boatload of money buying risky failing companies and turning them around to profitability. Gingrich counseled Fannie and Freddie. Which one would have more expertise to apply to a failing federal government?

by tncdel Posted 2012/01/24 03:10:58

Related Topics: Mitt Romney, Federal Government, Romney, Mitt, Dollar, Led, Thousands, Employees, Companies, Investor, Government, Gingrich, Job, Business

Read More

15 votes
Read all 12 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Gingrich would have more expertise at turning around failing enterprises [explain why you think so].	1 vote	7%
	Romney [tell us why].	14 votes	93%

Mitt Romney has spent more than 20 years in private enterprise, making thousands of business decisions affecting hundreds of companies that led to more than 100,000 new jobs and billions of dollars for employees and investors.

Add a comment above

Pedalpusher 2012/09/19 15:37:19

Romney [tell us why].

Has a proven track record, has already showed he can do it in his business practices!

reply
nbarton2 2012/09/19 03:49:33

Romney [tell us why].

Gingrinch really? Fannie and Freddie aren't success stories by any stretch. Romney at least has many businesses that have been successful.

reply
Sgt Major B 2012/06/10 16:45:57

Romney [tell us why].

Damned hard to argue with success.

reply
Charge 2012/06/10 16:44:00

Romney [tell us why].

+1
Because he can beat Obama.....

reply
dominic garcia 2012/03/31 13:13:55

Romney [tell us why].

+1
Without a doubt Mitt Romney is what our Country needs to turn the economy around. I believe he is a the right man. We need to put aside out petty little excuses to not like him and start supporting him 100%. He is our hope to bring back good American values into our families. His life speaks for itself. Mitt Romney can easily beat Obama.

reply
jams 2012/01/24 14:23:40

Romney [tell us why].

+1
Romney will work on the Economy.
Newt will work on rewriting the history of his personal legacy.

reply
USAF Vet 2012/01/24 07:40:57

Romney [tell us why].

+1
Romney's record over Gingrich's is unquestionable; both have ideas and solutions to the conundrum of problems facing this country. The sitting administration has shown nothing tangible to get this country out of the hole it's in (apart from cranking up the printing press) and new reasonable, rational ideas are more than welcome at this point in history.

reply
MadAsHEck 2012/01/24 03:38:17

Gingrich would have more expertise at turning around failing enterprises [exp...

Newt tol\d them to stop supporting the toxic mortgages if you do your research. Which they actually refused to follow.

reply
tncdel to MadAsHEck 2012/01/24 04:00:54

What was his track record at actually turning around failing enterprises? ZILCH! But Romney was an expert at doing just that.

reply
CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2012/01/24 03:20:47

Romney [tell us why].

+1
I'll take either one. If Romney wants Americans to vote for him over anyone else, he better get busy speaking like a true candidate who needs your vote instead of being the PRESUMED nominee.

reply
Ken 2012/01/24 03:12:45

Romney [tell us why].

+1
Both would.

reply
tncdel 2012/01/24 03:12:32

Romney [tell us why].

Please see this:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/ob...

reply