Mitt Romney, Chick-fil-A, and Ben & Jerry's

The Democratic mayors of Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. gave Mitt Romney and the Republican Party the greatest gift possible. They provided the American people with as clear an example of the unbridgeable differences between left and right, between Democrat and Republican, as could be hoped for.
And it was largely wasted.
The Democratic mayors of Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. announced that Chick-fil-A is not welcome in their cities because the owner/founder of Chick-fil-A supports preserving the man-woman definition of marriage.
Aside from free speech issues, the mayors did something dangerously un-American: they declared their cities open only to businesses whose ownership holds political positions they approve of.
And by extension, these mayors declared that anyone -- not just a business -- who believes that the man-woman definition of marriage should not be changed is not welcome in their cities. What should Mitt Romney have done with this gift?
He should have used the Chick-fil-A controversy to illuminate the most important aspect of this November's election: the difference between the left and the rest of the country.
Romney should have shown up at a Chick-fil-A restaurant to support that company, ordered a Chick-fil-A sandwich and -- here's the key -- eaten it along with a Ben & Jerry's ice cream.
The photo of Romney eating both a Chick-fil-A sandwich and Ben & Jerry's ice cream would be worth far more than the proverbial thousand words. Nearly every American who watches television news, or reads a newspaper, or gets the news online would have seen the picture and gotten the message.
The picture would make clear to the least political American the difference between Republicans and Democrats, between conservatives and progressives. In total contradistinction to the Democrats and the left, Mitt Romney would be seen eating food produced by one of the most left-wing companies in America. Ben & Jerry's has supported -- either monetarily or through statements made by one or both of the founders -- major left-wing causes, from the radical Occupy movement to the even more radical movement to free convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal.
Romney's message would be that in America, with rare exceptions (such as, for example, a Nazi- or KKK-owned company), we buy products based on their excellence, not the views of their makers. Do we really want supermarkets with sections for liberal ice cream, conservative ice cream, libertarian ice cream, atheist ice cream, etc.? (Of course, the left never labeled Barack Obama or the majority of black Americans and Muslims who believe in the man-woman definition of marriage "haters." The label is specifically directed at white Christians and Mormons who oppose same-sex marriage - proving its insincerity and its political motivation.)
Finally, while enjoying his Chick-fil-A and Ben & Jerry's, Romney could have noted that any American who believes that marriage should not be redefined is not welcome in Chicago, San Francisco, Boston, and Washington, D.C. It is time to shame the left.
Mitt Romney must run against leftism and the contemporary Democratic Party, not only against Barack Obama. The president is a leftist. That is the reason this country is in trouble.
The Chick-fil-A controversy is a perfect way to explain all this to the American people. All Mitt Romney needs to do is enjoy a certain brand of chicken and a certain brand of ice cream.