Mitt Romney and the Junk Bond Felon Michael Milken
The Boston Globe is out with the third in a hat-trick of probing and, for Mitt Romney, blistering stories from broadsheets this week about the presumptive Republican nominee's Bain Capital tenure - this one focusing on a specific deal he did with "junk bond king" and symbol of Gordon Gekko-type activity for his critics, Michael Milken.
This deal was in the 1980s, and involved Romney's hunt for $300 million in financing for a deal, which Milken provided:
What transpired would become not just one of the most profitable leveraged buyouts of the era, but also one of the most revealing stories of Romney’s Bain Capital career. It showed how he pivoted from being a relatively cautious investor to risking his reputation for a big payoff. It is one that Romney has rarely, if ever, mentioned in his two bids for the presidency, perhaps because the Houston-based department store chain that Bain assembled later went into bankruptcy.
But what distinguishes this deal from the nearly 100 others that Romney did over a 15-year period was his close work with Milken’s firm, Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. At the time of the deal, it was widely known that Milken and his company were under federal investigation, yet Romney decided to go ahead with the deal because Drexel had a unique ability to sell high-risk, high-yield debt instruments, known as “junk bonds.”
The Obama campaign has criticized the deal as showing Romney’s eagerness to make a “profit at any cost,” because workers lost jobs, and challenged Romney’s assertion that his business background best prepares him for the presidency. Romney, meanwhile, once referred to the deal as emanating from “the glorious days of Drexel Burnham,” saying, “it was fun while it lasted,” in a little-noticed interview with American Banker magazine.
The “glorious” part, for Romney at least, was that he used junk-bond financing to turn a $10 million investment into a $175 million profit for himself, his partners, and his investors. It marked a turning point for Romney, according to Marc Wolpow, a former Drexel employee who was involved in the deal and later was hired by Romney to work at Bain Capital.
“Mitt, I think, spent his life balanced between fear and greed,” Wolpow said. “He knew that he had to make a lot of money to launch his political career. It’s very hard to make a lot of money without taking some kind of reputational risk along the way. It’s just hard to do. It doesn’t mean you have to do anything illegal or immoral, but you often have to take reputational risk to make money.”
The story is long, and some of the most interesting elements are the fact that Milken was slapped with the insider trading charges that ultimately led him to being jailed after a guilty plea just as the deal with Bain was being cemented:
Some clients feared being tainted by scandal, but Romney stayed loyal: The deal was too important.
“We did not say, ‘Oh my goodness, Drexel has been accused of something, not been found guilty,’” Romney told the Globe years later. “Should we basically stop the transaction and blow the whole thing up?”
The less-sexy elements of the piece relate to the merger of department store chains into Stage Stores, which later filed for bankruptcy and which has been one of the cases highlighted by Democrats as an example of how Bain profited even if some of the companies it took over did not.
This is not a freshly-unearthed case - the authors of the book "The Real Romney," one of whom co-wrote this Globe piece, write about the Milken deal in their book. This is also the way leveraged buyouts work - complicated, multi-dimensional deals.
But the chances of this story making it into ad copy or direct mail are high, with Milken's very-recognizable name attached and the Globe's reporting quoted.
Republicans have been relieved that the messaging around Romney's business career has remained, as Alex and John Harris put it, a "muddle" so late in the year. The bet from the Democrats is that there is seepage over time, filling out the frame of Romney as too risky to take a chance on.
Top Opinion
-
mach 2012/06/26 04:49:58+11Funny thing about old Mitt, there's not a lot of conspiracy theories surrounding him, like the lies that were thrown around about Obama. The plain truth is right out in the open, we know everything about him, undisputable. He's simply put a guy that's going to sit in the Oval office playing high risk roulette with America!






















Better yet... since you know it all, just what would YOU do?
And before you go all RWNJ on me... I'm Independent.
Look at the video..Obama says himself to be of muslim decent. SCROLL UP AND look at the entire conversation. THE POINT is not about Obama being ANYTHING in particular it was about there being no rellevant difference between Obama and ROMNEY so i pointed out the very few differences between them, and then the similarities.
delusional ? I think not! So instead of ASSUMING that im Right wing at all MAYBE take your own advice and chill before jumpin down my throught IM INDEPENDENT !
BTW another characteristic of RWNJ is there consistent beatching over the way one writes... LMAO... you Nutsac's are so anal about grammar and spelling that you can't hold a conversation with a paper bag without checking the manufacturer stamp on the bag for errors.
Get a clue grammar fairy... it's a blog... we have CONVERSATIONS on blogs... and we don't have to play by anyone's rules...
So before you keep getting your panties in wad, chill and have a conversation... It's about conversation... not the way we communicate... and if you can't figure out something that simple then and other can... doesn't say much about your intellect.
Now I expect more ranting over the way I write or some other BS... because I know you anus is just begging for air right now... It's so cliched up... LMAO!
Look at the video...
Hey special ed.... look at your own words...
"Obama says himself to be of muslim decent" which is what Wilde told you...
But then who used the term Muslim?
More of your OWN words...
"different.... mormon/muslim"
Now since you thought you knew the term different please explain why you played moron?
We're waiting.
And again you idiots are focusing on everything but what the point of my comment and opinion was.
TYPICAL, cant refute the facts of what someone was actually saying so you find an irrelevant point in the conversation to poke at and ignore the point of fact.
so ill say it ONCE more and then im omw. Romney = Obama, no real rellevant difference.
I have no problem with Obama vs. Romney being the same... But you busted yourself with the "different.... mormon/muslim" BS, and then posted a video which clearly states he's not...
Then you confirmed it with your own statement... "Obama says himself to be of muslim decent".
Now who's being "incomplete"? Seems you're the idiot... and now you have no point!
You need to get on your knees... and pray for forgiveness... LMAO
Clueless... again! LMAO!
Now these cockroaches are trying to move to the middle...
They're scared!
No where in there does it say party affiliation.
Dear what drives and supports the GOP?
The same ideology and ideologues you just posted about...
ROFL... now your trying to separate the two..
Have a nice life... I got work to do.
My choice on my profile says conservative because that is what i am first! Idenpendent in the fact that i do not support nor am i loyal to a candidate or president simply for party affiliation. Meaning i will not vote republican if i do not agree or support the candidate. same goes for democrat, libertarian, green, ect ect. i vote on principal, record, and consistancy, not party.
Don't tell someone you're an independent when your page says you're a conservative (typo) but then get piss when someone calls you a conservative. Clarify and don't assume people know what's in your head and heart. I can only go from what you say and if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck its a conservative! Maybe you should choose OTHER.. that makes more sense or will your conservative friends stop talking to you??
Another thing. Don't' bitch about the way someone types when you misspell words, that's just asinine.
"conservatism promotes retaining traditional institutions and supports, at most, minimal and gradual change in society. A person who follows the philosophies of conservatism is referred to as a traditionalist or conservative"
"Independent or non-party politician is an individual not affiliated to any political party. Independents may hold a centrist viewpoint between those of major political parties or a viewpoint more extreme than any major party, or they may have a viewpoint based on issues that they do not feel that any major party addresses. Other independent politicians are associated with a political party and may be former members of it, but choose not to stand under its label. A third category of independents are those who may belong to or support a political party but believe they should not formally represent it and thus be subject to its policies. Finally, some independent candidates may form a political party for the purposes of running for public office.
DID you understand it that time? No where does it say a conservative is right or left ... or that Independents are or are not conservatives.. YOU can be both. wow
lol ignorance truely is bliss isnt it??
I dont mean to be rude, but seriously you need to research a little better independently rather than listen to headlines and msm.
Then you accuse me of being delusional?
The DIFFERENCE between the two of them is one is "Big Corporation", the other is "Pro Union".
The only reason someone can not see the similarity is this.
[...]
Romney/Obama= Big Gov, NDAA, Patriot Act, CISPA, FISA, Wall-Street Bailouts, Corporate Subsidies, Indefinite Detention, Drones, Torture, Endless Wars, Slave to Lobbyists, Loves Drug War, Guantanamo, Slave to AIPAC/Israel and DOES NOT PUT AMERICA FIRST."
He extended the "patriot act" 3 times. Added the "indefinite detention" provision to the NDAA and signed it while congress was in recess. Then authorized the use of 30,000 Drone Aircraft over the sky's of the USA.
He sounds more like a "totalitarian madman" to me. What is your reason not being alarmed about losing your liberty? The past two administrations have stolen it from us. It is not there's to take. Too many brave souls died so we could keep it.
So far Obama has a worse "freedom record" than Bush, is that acceptable to you? I find it totally unacceptable. Now look what the Obama administration is up to. If he keeps this up "free speech" will be in jeopardy. Obama's "Truth team" Shuts down Journalist's web site. On Go Daddy.com.
http://www.homelandsecurityus...
Only Ron Paul will get it back for us. He is no ordinary Republican.
You have been fooled not me.
That figures now you sound like a Romney supporter...