Affordable health care for all has nothing to do with contraception, sterilization, or abortion. That unholy trinity is not the grand summa of women's causes.
According to the decree of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, if ever I were to run for public office and be elected, it would not be a victory for women because I'm not the right kind of woman. Women like me are a detriment to the cause and must be kept out of public influence. Pardon me, Ms. Schultz, but who are you to say that women's concerns can only be served by those who champion your boss's commitment to abortion and contraception?
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Catholic Online) - I'm the wrong kind of woman. I guess I always knew it, and now it's official.
According to the decree of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, if ever I were to run for public office and be elected, it would not be a victory for women because I'm not the right kind of woman. Women like me don't count at all. For anything. In fact, women like me are a detriment to the cause and must be kept out of public influence.
"I think we have to be cautious about who is, you know, just celebrating that a woman got elected to a particular office and make sure that we have women who are running and winning who are going to champion the causes of women - who are going to make the agenda that is important to women like equal pay for equal work and making sure that when it comes to fighting for middle class families and ensuring access to birth control and making sure that health care is a priority and that it's affordable, making sure that access to education and higher education is a priority."
"So, electing just any woman shouldn't be the goal. Electing a woman who is going to make the issues important to women and families is really should be the focus and I don't know if we made as much progress on that as we should."
"It's just so hard for me to grasp how they [Republicans] can be as anti-woman as they are," she said, according to the Weekly Standard. "I think that the pushback and the guttural reaction from women against the Republicans' agenda out of the gate, the war on women that the Republicans have been waging since they took over the House, I think is not only going to restore but help us exceed the president's margin of victory in the next election."(At this point, I must attempt to restrain myself because believe me, I have some choice words for Ms. Schultz.)
Cut the crap, Ms. Schultz. This isn't about fighting for middle class families or higher education. It's about abortion and contraception, period. The code embedded in your little speech is about as subtle as a flashing neon sign: the only woman you want on Capitol Hill or any hill anywhere is a pro-abortion, Pill-pushing woman. The "feminist" agenda demands perfect worship at the altar of abortion. You know it and I know it. Planned Parenthood is your clubhouse.
The "progress" you seek is quite simply the reduction of women to available vaginas and sterile uteruses that welcome knives, scissors, forceps and vacuums as instruments of "freedom" when the obligatory prevention fails.
You don't speak for me, Ms. Schultz. Your agenda is repugnant to me, and your ideas of progress for women are insulting to me. There are many, many women who feel as I do, and we are deserving of representation in Congress and state governments, and we vote. We are not a hindrance to women's success or growth or rights. We think the girl in the womb is deserving of life and liberty, too. Why don't you?
Equal pay for equal work has absolutely nothing to do with propping up Planned Parenthood and forcing people to subsidize contraception for every woman in America. Guess what? I don't need your Pills or your condoms or your sterilizations. And I refuse to pay for any of that for anyone else. How ironic that while you're stomping your foot demanding "choices" for women you want to deprive me of mine by mandating that I buy someone else's birth control and pay for abortions.
Why must women's sexual choices be subsidized by everyone else? How does that promote women's independence? What happened to freedom? Didn't anyone ever tell you that freedom isn't
free?You and your boss may gladly pay homage to Baby-Killers-R-Us, Inc., but I will not. I recognize that abortion does not empower women; it enslaves them. Abortion is not freedom; it is violence. I look objectively and see that the abortion culture teaches young girls that sex is power and they are primarily "sexual beings"; it teaches them to let themselves be used and discarded by men, and to see their own child as the enemy of their lives. It makes it easy for men to use, abuse, and violate women, and get rid of the "evidence" of their abuse. It leaves women shouldering the entire burden of childbearing alone. It allows the scumbags to walk away, and it forces the good guys to stand powerless while their children are slaughtered.
Yeah, abortion has really done wonders for society. Men and women get along so much better now.
I guess we should not be surprised at her behavior to say whatever she deems necessary, regardless of whether it is truthful. That, my friends, is an act of desperation from a party whose nominee, the current president, has no real accomplishment but abject failure, the diminishment of America, crippling debt, and division of the country along racial and socioeconomic lines. Can we vote them out? YES, WE CAN...AND WE WILL.
http://www.therightscoop.com/...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
or the origin is a farce like you ?
PS: If you stereotype and attack a person based on their ethnic origin, what does that make you?
I mean, what kind of logic is that? I can't comment on the socio-political agenda of a person who happens to be Jewish just because I'm German? Oh right, that's Liberal logic. "White people who criticize Obama are racists (but it's perfectly ok when white Liberals attack Herman Cain)".
Sorry, but the race / religion card is useless when it comes to politics. If your best "argument" against my opinion comes down to "you're German, so you must be a nazi", you're merely demonstrating that you have nothing of value to contribute on this issue.
besides promoting the socialistic regimes there !
It is more than obvious that Democrta ideology is that only persons of an approved social subset and political philosophy can be allowed to represent their prospecrive social enclaves. And the sacrement of Abortion On Demand is to be protected above all.
To the Liberal woman/man the ability to sacrifice the most helpless segment of society for the sake of personal pleasure, personal economic benefit and Party political gain is to be perpetuated with all the zelotry of a Banzi attack.
In the name of individual freedom, the potential Liberty of a weaker entity is gladly dismissed with callous mention of the most heinous acts wheither they apply or not. The mention of such acts seeks to imply they apply to all or most "unwanted pregnacys" as if they are the norm rather than the abmormal. Alternatives such as adoption are dismissed because of the cost, which is rare to hear from a Lib/Prog in other political discussion.
I hope Karen beats the panties off of her - ( but ew no photos plz!) KAREN for Congress! http://www.karenforcongress.c...
damned skippy!
The duplicity of the pro abortion mandarins is astounding that they would en mass demonstrate that the State does not have the moral right to execute a mass murderer. Yea, and in the same breathe a woman is given the carte blanche, sole moral jurisdiction to order her babies execution, simply because it is housed in her womb.
It's the LIBERALS who love the idea of making CHILDREN at the age of 15 incapable of ever having kids (via STERILIZING THEM), with out their parent's consent.
http://www.ncregister.com/blo...
So who is going to MAKE this decision? The kids, some bureaucrat, a teacher? Are they going to say if a child is AUTISTIC, BLACK, or HISPANIC ... they will NOT be allowed to have CHILDREN (EVER)? Who are these NAZIS to play GOD with the lives of OUR DAUGHTERS?
THE LIBERAL SCUMBAGS are the Nazis who are doing this!
And it's OBAMA's FDA who wrongly banned a exceptionally LIFE SAVING Breast Cancer DRUG .... because THEY 'decided' the drug was too expensive. Now that they have banned the drug ... it will no longer be covered under insurance. So thanks to the LIBSCUM, many Breast Cancer sufferers will DIE thanks to the #LIBERALS!
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.techdirt.com/artic...
http://hotair.com/archives/20...
The REAL WAR ON WOMEN is being waged. However, the LIBERALS are the ones WAGING it!
It's the LIBERALS who love the idea of making CHILDREN at the age of 15 incapable of ever having kids (via STERILIZING THEM), with out their parent's consent.
http://www.ncregister.com/blo...
So who is going to MAKE this decision? The kids, some bureaucrat, a teacher? Are they going to say if a child is AUTISTIC, BLACK, or HISPANIC ... they will NOT be allowed to have CHILDREN (EVER)? Who are these NAZIS to play GOD with the lives of OUR DAUGHTERS?
THE LIBERAL SCUMBAGS are the Nazis who are doing this!
And it's OBAMA's FDA who wrongly banned a exceptionally LIFE SAVING Breast Cancer DRUG .... because THEY 'decided' the drug was too expensive. Now that they have banned the drug ... it will no longer be covered under insurance. So thanks to the LIBSCUM, many Breast Cancer sufferers will DIE thanks to the #LIBERALS!
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.techdirt.com/artic...
http://hotair.com/archives/20...
The REAL WAR ON WOMEN is being waged. However, the LIBERALS are the ones WAGING it!
And as a mother of two teenaged girls 15 & 17, I have to ask are my daughters going to have a choice? Or are they simply going to be 'taken' and 'sterilized' like dogs?
I do have to say, this isn't the first time that a democrat has pulled this.
http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/...
http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/...