Media's Moral Morass
|
|
|||||
|
39 votes
|
|
72% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
9% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
19% | |||
From the original article, by Robert Knight of The Washington Times:
__________________________
The unabated moral confusion flowing through the media is stunning. It’s so bad, you can’t look away. But we should try.
With a few exceptions, the major TV networks are a torrential sewer of leftwing propaganda and smutty sitcoms.
Print and online media are more diversified, but The New York Times has so many certifiables writing for it that I can’t even decide which one to quote. Elsewhere, columnists like the Miami Herald‘s Leonard Pitts Jr., spin out nuggets like:
Racial animus is an element of tea party ideology, but not its entirety.
Why, thanks for that caveat, Mr. Pitts.
The Washington Post‘s Courtland Milloy, after watching the
Iowa caucuses on TV back in January, complained bitterly that “nearly
everybody was white.” Imagine that shoe on the other foot.
_________________
Imagine that, indeed. If you follow the article, you'll see a lot more, from The Washington Post.
How about this? Do you think the media are delivering a consistent moral message? Or have they become a collection of thoroughly bad content and worse craft, with only their connections to keep them alive?
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/06/18...
Top Opinion
-
Peewee 2012/06/18 17:25:43Bad content and worse craft. How does such junk get into print?+11They are a disgrace, deliberately letting out what they want the people to hear and leaving out important news such as Obama's connection to the New Party - which would have been a circus if it was a Republican.






















(IMHO) The New York Times is center left while the Wall Street Journal is center right. Mainstream liberal views are represented by the Huffington Post and MSNBC. Mainstream conservative views are represented by Fox News and The National Review. Left wing views are represented by The Nation, while right wing views are presented by World Net Daily (WND) and so-called "Accuracy In Media" (AIM). Radical Left views are represented by CPUSA's The Daily Worker, while radical Right views are represented by John Birch Society's The New American.
Temlakos....That's the best description I have heard about the TV networks. It is so fitting.
for a giggle...
is paul krugman...
and they say he's an economist...ok-
kind of a toss up tho...
between he and e.j.dione...
as to who speaks more out their ass-
and damn that e.j.sure is funny looking...
like a toddler super-sized -
then there's the redoubtable[snicker] gene robinson-
often good for a hoot or two-
Alas that is not the case. Reporters have their own biases which are blatantly obvious in
all media!
There are usually code words imbedded to promote whatever the agenda is for the day!
The liberal media wins the trophy for disinformation without shame.
It appears that many reporters are morally bankrupt and more interested in selling their programmed message than telling the truth.
We no longer have a free press. It has been totally corrupted to promote the agenda of those who wield the money and the power, to the detriment of the people.
"The Washington Post‘s Courtland Milloy, after watching the
Iowa caucuses on TV back in January, complained bitterly that “nearly
everybody was white.” Imagine that shoe on the other foot."
"Imagine that shoe on the other foot"? Huh?
...anyone who believes such exists is a regular moron.
Thank goodness for the internet, although there is no shortage of garbage there too.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/...
Stuff like this, you have to see to believe. Follow the link to the original article, and you'll see further links to some of the worst prose that ever crossed your consoles.