Mars comes close between 2014 and 2018, should the U.S. go?
Christian
2012/06/13 06:57:59
|
|
|||||
|
94 votes
|
|
68% | |||
|
44 votes
|
|
32% | |||
In the last 12 years we have spent trillions on war and bailing out the banks. The middle 60s and early 70s gave us Apollo and put men on the moon. Since then we have had many booms in our economy, our economy has grown much larger since then. We have a GDP of nearly $15 trillion, the GDP in 1972 was a little over a trillion, to be exact =($1237.9). If we can send a man to the moon then with almost 15 times less GDP, why do we not send a Man to Mars now with a $15 trillion GDP. With all the trillions we spent on war and bailing out the banks. Would we really miss the $300 billion it would cost to put a man on Mars. Plus think of the jobs it would provide in the tech industry and the money that would be pumped into the economy not to mention the new technologies that would come out of it. My theory is that Olympus Mons the largest volcano ever seen so far in the solar system, blew trillions of dollars worth of diamonds all over Mars and are probably laying in thin dirt all around the volcano. Volcano's are known for blowing Diamonds out from deep in the earths mantle where they are formed. Olympus Mons being a large deep super Volcano likley blew out a few Trillion dollars worth of Diamonds from deep inside the mantle of Mars. I think it will pay off for men to be on Mars and to secure a dominant position for the U.S. in space. The Earth comes close to Mars between 2014 and 2018, we should go then.
Top Opinion
-
Yes, the USA should go to MARS between 2014 and 2018.
+7Yes, but send all: 535 of congress, the Rock-a-f-ckers, Rottenchilds, Ted Turner, ,Bill Gates, the 1%, the globalists, the elite, the Bilderberg group, members of the CFR, Bohemian grove participants, corrupt banksters, the transhumanist sickos, living numbers: 39,41,42,43 & 44. Oh yeah, Sandusky & friends. Please feel free to add to the list.
www.Mars-One.com
Having enough fuel to escape the Martian Gravity. So there plan is to first land on an asteroid in the asteroid belt, then they will go to Mars. That is the United States plan... but the problem is, is that they cut the funding to NASA, so now NASA is being funded by corporations. Not to mention, it shouldn't be a country thing. EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD SHOULD COOPERATE TO GET TO MARS. This is about the advancement of mankind. Not the United States.
All I am saying is we always have money for war why not come up with money for something that will make us money. Mars has stuff that's worth money and I don't want to be in an oxygen tent when they land on Mars and find out.
One Giant Leap, for mankind...
Remember those words?
- bring a great quantum leap in advance technology.
- open new jobs.
- motivate more people to become scientist and advance mankind even more.
- Colonization of other possible planets
- Survival of Mankind, Earth is not going to be habitable pretty soon, Mankind's days are numbered on this planet
- Another step for deep space travel
- Allow humans to reach the next evolutionary stage...
Mining and transport would be ungodly expensive. They feel that the cost to building a mining port on the moon would cost more than the product they are mining... If there is a more of a cost sufficient way to do this, I am sure they would have done this a long time ago.