Quantcast

Man jailed for holding bible study at home. Does he deserve jail?

☆ElenaDiamond☆ 2012/08/06 14:03:51
You!
Add Photos & Videos

The married father of six is an ordained pastor of Church of God in Christ and founder of Harvest Christian Fellowship. He and his family believe he has the right to worship at home on his private property.

"The only people who came to our home were family and friends," Salman said in a video posted online before he reported to jail this week. "Our home was not open to the public; it was private."

His wife, Suzanne Salman, said her husband's constitutional rights have been violated.

"Christians deserve the right to gather at their homes privately just like every other American has the right to gather for their reasons," she told FoxNews.com.


Read More: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/05/arizona-man-s...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • cmdrbnd007 2012/08/06 14:12:53
    Yes.
    cmdrbnd007
    +19
    There would be as many as 80 people there in his Bible study. I'm sorry that is not a Bible study that is a worship service. Imagine all the cars parked in the streets and imagine you live on that street. He was not jailed because of the Bible study he was jailed because of the number of people. He needs to find a separate building if there are going to be that many people attending. This was a zoning code violation and my guess is it was also a fire hazard.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ☆ElenaD... Jan 2012/08/06 16:15:51
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +1
    Agree!
  • Diane Spraggs Yates 2012/08/06 16:07:33
    No.
    Diane Spraggs Yates
    +1
    Freedom to gather peacably is a right !!!!
  • I don't like Obama in office 2012/08/06 16:06:40 (edited)
    No.
    I don't like Obama in office
    +1
    .. To be able to be secure in ones own home with out fear of we the people, What infringed ment of rights of another did this man carry out , Was no One hurt was no one causing harm to structure of another person Private or public less those fact for the Elected to pass a law making a crime of peacefully other wise interfering with the right to peaceably assemble. thus would be unconstitutional and seeking to conspire to deprive basic function of life and freedom, This Zoning sounds like the Government seeking to restrain such because they are not collecting taxes or Property Tax laws as such they not a 501 c3, thus woud be unconstitutional based on what could be constitued as a taxble matter. the Sales Tax on things sold was to be the truth of taxs Thus part of the Voluntary tax system history.. I would fight it
  • foy49 I don't... 2012/08/06 16:37:57 (edited)
    foy49
    +3
    This little story, as presented by Fox, leaves out some very important facts.
    For example , Mr Salman first came to the attention of The North Glen neighborhood at large (1 sq. mile) 4 or 5 years ago when he, first intentionally, and with out proper permitting, built outside of his property lines and in to the public "Right of Way" and proceed to file for an abandonment and "taking" of ROW that had already been dedicated for the future extension of an existing street.
    The neighborhood resisted, with the support of the Phoenix City Council.
  • I don't... foy49 2012/08/06 17:06:58 (edited)
    I don't like Obama in office
    +1
    If you as such speak or write the truth--- If thus he was out side of the rights of his owner ship on land that was not his ...Sorry to say The Courts have him by the Book..
  • SA 2012/08/06 15:42:43
    Yes.
    SA
    +8
    First off I am all for freedom of religion and private Bible studies in the home. But, it seems this man has been warned more than once about the "number" of people who attended his services.

    I would not want to be neighbors with someone who had Bible Studies of up to 80 people. All the Bible studies I have attended were up to 12 people at the most. He was having church not Bible study in his home. He collected tithes.

    He had been warned previously, yet did not take the warnings to heart. Maybe the sentence was too long, but he needed a wake-up call. What was going to make him realize having 80 people in your home, whether friends or family could be dangerous?
  • ☆ElenaD... SA 2012/08/06 16:17:53
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +1
    People have tupperware parties, birthday parties, pampered chef parties etc.....there is no difference.
  • SA ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 16:29:46
    SA
    +3
    I agree. Any large gathering of 80 people can be dangerous.

    As I said I have been to Bible Studies in the home before. This man was performing church services, not a Bible Study. I was never asked for tithes at Bible Study, but in Church I was.
    Again, I do believe in the Freedom of Religion.
  • lil crazy ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 20:36:06
    lil crazy
    +3
    Yes, but they do not have them twice a week every week so there is a difference. Besides the fact he was breaking fire code laws that he was repeatedly warned about.
  • Mel ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 21:16:53
    Mel
    +4
    I've never seen a Tupperware party that violated zoning laws, which is why this happened. NOT his religious beliefs.
  • sha_lyn68 ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/07 03:54:55
    sha_lyn68
    +1
    Who do you know that has Tupperware parties with 80 guest 2x a week for several months?
  • I don't... SA 2012/08/06 16:22:00 (edited)
    I don't like Obama in office
    +1
    He collected tithes ----This Zoning sounds like the Government or Elected common defense ..seeking to restrain freedom without just cause -- such because they are not collecting taxes or Property Tax laws as such they are not a 501 c3,!
    The tax-exempt has some framer work in Acts like say.. The Homestead Act of 1862.. thus for The courts to carry out a arrest warrant with out any real danger to him self or person or Country as a whole..thus would be a rejection of due processes of law -exaggerated false pretence for arrest---pro thus would be unconstitutional based on not limited to what could be constitued as a taxble matter. the Sales Tax on things sold was to be the truth of taxs Thus part of the Voluntary tax system history..the federal enforement would not or could be forced unless there was a war being fought on American Soil...declared by the houses of congress--thus I would fight it for seeking to conspire to derpive..thus out lined Civil rights Acts 1871--
  • Ian SA 2012/08/06 18:54:18
    Ian
    This agin is why i have stopped reading the papers and looking at the news,they select what you want to hear and see that part they want you to see.
  • Horace 2012/08/06 15:39:50
    Yes.
    Horace
    +1
    I believe that the real issue was that he was violating his parole by having so many people over to his house. If it was just a bible study then perhaps some mercy is called for for him but given his criminal past as a gang member the police were right to be concerned. I wish him all the luck in the world after his probation is done and I really hope that he has indeed turned his life around but until then he has to prove to the rest of society that he is not a threat.
  • foy49 2012/08/06 15:29:04 (edited)
    Yes.
    foy49
    +2
    There is much more hear than meets the eye.
    Take a look at Salman's attorney.

    Building a Movement

    Right Wing 101

    "The Rutherford Institute - John W. Whitehead

    John W. Whitehead, head of the Rutherford Institute, has gone to great lengths to conceal the ideological leanings of his Christian Right legal center in statements to the mass media. He told the New York Times that "Oh, gosh, no," he had no political agenda in representing Paula Jones, and that he had founded the Rutherford Institute by himself. The New York Times reporter described The Rutherford Institute as "a kind of evangelical Christian civil liberties union."118



    Whitehead's claims misrepresent the group. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, is blunt, "Our files on the Institute go back 10 years. After examining the material, we can safely say Whitehead is not being honest in his description of his organization."119



    From its founding, the Rutherford Institute has pursued a highly-politicized ultra-conservative agenda. A review of Rutherford Institute newsletters, reports, and direct mail appeals going back seven years shows a long pattern of attacks on liberals in government and President Clinton in particular. Whitehead consistently puts forward an apocalyptic...
    There is much more hear than meets the eye.
    Take a look at Salman's attorney.

    Building a Movement

    Right Wing 101

    "The Rutherford Institute - John W. Whitehead

    John W. Whitehead, head of the Rutherford Institute, has gone to great lengths to conceal the ideological leanings of his Christian Right legal center in statements to the mass media. He told the New York Times that "Oh, gosh, no," he had no political agenda in representing Paula Jones, and that he had founded the Rutherford Institute by himself. The New York Times reporter described The Rutherford Institute as "a kind of evangelical Christian civil liberties union."118



    Whitehead's claims misrepresent the group. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, is blunt, "Our files on the Institute go back 10 years. After examining the material, we can safely say Whitehead is not being honest in his description of his organization."119



    From its founding, the Rutherford Institute has pursued a highly-politicized ultra-conservative agenda. A review of Rutherford Institute newsletters, reports, and direct mail appeals going back seven years shows a long pattern of attacks on liberals in government and President Clinton in particular. Whitehead consistently puts forward an apocalyptic conspiracist vision of devout Christian activists under concerted attack by corrupt and repressive government officials in the service of godless and immoral secular humanism.
    (more)
  • Dave0626 2012/08/06 15:06:06
    No.
    Dave0626
    +4
    Not put in jail...but issued a 'Zoning Violation Fine' due to the large number of vehicles crowding his neighbors.
    That is the REAL issue...Not the Bible study!
  • foy49 Dave0626 2012/08/06 16:02:21
    foy49
    +5
    In my opinion the real issue is that Salman has been in defiance of the City's zoning laws, and the Fire Dept. public safety standards for years now, in an "in your face" attempt to get charged for any crime, in order to be able to claim "religious persecution" in a lawsuit against the C.O.P.
    I have watched this story unfold for several years now and it is my opinion that it has always been about creating an opportunity to sue this, selif insured, city.

    Watch for the inevitable lawsuit that will follow this arrest.
  • Dave0626 foy49 2012/08/06 16:57:59
    Dave0626
    +3
    Oh OK, I see...didn't know the whole story. Not very 'Christian' of him to be that arrogant to his neighbors, and hunting for easy money via a lawsuit. In that case he is just another money grabbing Bible thumper...So yeah put his butt in jail!
  • Larry Dave0626 2012/08/06 16:57:16
    Larry
    +2
    I'm gonna take a guess and say he has been warned several times
  • Dave0626 Larry 2012/08/06 16:59:12
    Dave0626
    +1
    Probably so.
  • Ian Dave0626 2012/08/06 18:55:51
    Ian
    +2
    A word in the ear, but then again were they speaking to a deaf person.Some people do not take advice.
  • John Rafael 2012/08/06 15:05:15
    No.
    John Rafael
    +2
    its part of right - the cops have no right to intervene their private life - he has a right to practice his religion (and thought) - if im not wrong it's a part of the US constitution . i mean i'm sure everyone all over the world (who is religious) study religion at home meaning it doesn't consider illegal. If he would be living in Europe, he would have the right to sue the cops :D
  • john Kills 2012/08/06 14:58:42
    No.
    john Kills
    +3
    Like I said, our constitution is gone. I still believe in the freedom to practice religion.
  • nightcrawler2005 2012/08/06 14:57:42
    No.
    nightcrawler2005
    +1
    I think the jail time was an overkill. Yes he has a large enough property but they probably wanted to shut him down for a number of reasons. One he's an ex gang member associating with criminals, two if he continues holding these meetings it might reinforce his case to get the tax free status for the property he was after.

    They most definitely would have a hate on with him if he tried to get a permit to build a game room when in fact he was trying to build a church. Now that was a complete lie.to also re-enforce his bid for tax free status.
  • Tennyson James 2012/08/06 14:56:48
    Yes.
    Tennyson James
    +6
    He has not been jailed for holding Bible studies in his home. He was jailed for breaking the law. He obtained permits to build a garage on his property and then proceded to build a church and hold services (including collectong tithes). His building was cited for 96 code violations, and he was found guilty of 67 misdemeanors. Regardless of his religion the man is a liar. Here is a fact sheet about the case issued by the city: http://phoenix.gov/news/07121...
  • poet4justice 2012/08/06 14:55:11
    No.
    poet4justice
    +3
    but he has to follow the law and plus probation it doesn't make him free
    the real problem that i have if he was able to educate about tax exempt, he should be able to educate ab out zoning and building code
    Michael Salman is serving a 60-day sentence in Maricopa County's notorious Tent City jail for allegedly violating his probation by holding religious services on his property in violation of zoning and building codes. He was arrested July 9, after authorities charged the one-time gang member hosted Bible sessions for as many 80 people on his 4-acre property, which he tried to claim as a tax-exempt church.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/201...
  • lil crazy poet4ju... 2012/08/06 20:40:12
    lil crazy
    +4
    He was asked, repeatedly, to comply with the safety codes of the City.

    http://phoenix.gov/news/07121...
  • poet4ju... lil crazy 2012/08/06 20:49:02
    poet4justice
    +2
    i see, thank you for the info
  • John Hall 2012/08/06 14:54:02
    No.
    John Hall
    +1
    This is what you would call a invasion of privacy he has the right to hold bible study in his home . Goverment went to far with this one .
  • Headhunter 13 2012/08/06 14:39:44
    Yes.
    Headhunter 13
    +2
    this was not about holding a study group but about a parole violation
  • ☆ElenaD... Headhun... 2012/08/06 14:47:31 (edited)
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +3
    right.... not
  • Headhun... ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 15:03:25 (edited)
    Headhunter 13
    +1
    It was said plainly right in the article you choose to post. I you want to imagine persecution that is your delusion not the facts
  • ☆ElenaD... Headhun... 2012/08/06 15:19:55
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +1
    They are using it as an excuse.
  • Headhun... ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 15:39:53
    Headhunter 13
    +2
    No it is a fact. That is what he was charged with and what he did. It is a fcat that you posted and that your source explicitly sttaed
  • ☆ElenaD... Headhun... 2012/08/06 16:20:09
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    I believe the charges are trumped up. I am not disputing the validity of the source. I believe the charges are bogus.
  • Headhun... ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 16:22:39 (edited)
    Headhunter 13
    +2
    Then you are working with a delusion and probably should be monitored, your paranoia is going unchecked. What you believe does not change the facts in any way, shape or form. Apparently you posted this not for the truth or for people to disagree but because you wanted a bunch of like minded paranoid with a persecution complex to come on here and agree with your belief not the facts
  • ☆ElenaD... Headhun... 2012/08/06 16:26:36 (edited)
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    Relax. I am allowed an opinion.

    Don't be so insulting. I haven't insulted You.
  • Headhun... ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 16:30:07
    Headhunter 13
    +2
    Again I only stated facts. You don't like or want the facts.
  • Mel ☆ElenaD... 2012/08/06 21:39:07
    Mel
    +3
    Did you even read the entire article? Did you do any followup on the article? I did. This man violated the law as far as zoning, fire and safety rules so many times you couldn't count them. And where he was building the structure, he had no permits or inspections. What is that structure was to collapse on someone?

    As for the obstruction of traffic what if a emergency service truck such as the fire brigade or police had to ho through there? What if on of the neighbours had an emergency? Too many factors for that simplistic answer.
  • ☆ElenaD... Mel 2012/08/06 22:13:17
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    pish posh.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 04:00:02

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals