Another Sherrod video surfaced today.

This latest video shows Saint Shirley Sherrod’s husband Charles making a black separatist speech, to supporters in January.

Riehl World View posted the revealing video:

Charles Sherrod’s comments are unambiguous in their anti-white, black separatist sentiments.

The four-minute-thirty-three-second excerpt, apparently unedited,
shows Sherrod talking about the $13 million settlement by the USDA for
the racial discrimination lawsuit brought by Sherrod, his wife and their
black farmer cooperative New Communities.

Sherrod says one of the purposes of the Georgia-based cooperative was
to feed “our people in the North” of the United States. He goes on to
urge young blacks to use their money for the “total liberation” of
blacks and to find a way to trust each other so that their riches don’t
end up in the hands of whites.

The video ends with Sherrod appealing, “We must stop the white man and his Uncle Toms from stealing our elections.”

Young people, you will be making more money than we ever
dreamed of. Please find a way, find a way that we can trust each other
so that our moneys can work for our total liberation.

We have ideas, inventions, athletic talent. But our labor and our
moneys and our contracts usually end up in the white folks’ hands and
pockets.

When will we trust our own?

“Finally we must stop the white man and his Uncle Toms from stealing
our elections. We must not be afraid to vote black. And we must not be
afraid to turn a black out who votes against our interests.”

Jay Tea nails it!

One element of the whole Shirley Sherrod mess has bugged me
from the outset. One aspect that has simply not made any sense
whatsoever in the whole narrative. And that is how quickly the Obama
administration and the NAACP jumped to distance themselves from her, and
how hard they jumped.

The Sherrods tend to wear their politics on their sleeves. Or, at
least, their children. Their children, born in the 1960′s (about my
age), are named “Russia” and “Kenyatta.”

Remember, also, that Sherrod was appointed to her position
immediately after winning a billion-dollar settlement against said
Department in a lawsuit dating back over a decade. She was no stranger
to career Department of Agriculture employees, who’d had an adversarial
relationship with her.

It all ties together. As an unwritten (but understood) portion of the
settling of Sherrod’s lawsuit, she gets a plum job with the Department
of Agriculture. The Obama administration know she’s a loose cannon on
racial matters, but they figure that bringing her in will at least give
them a slight measure of control over her. Yeah, she was a racist,
Marxist demagogue, but she was their racist, Marxist demagogue. Give her
a mid-level job to shut her up.

Until the video came out. And the reactions make perfect sense in
that context. The Obama administration wasn’t dismayed about her
statements, but worried about their using a federal job to buy off
Sherrod. And the NAACP was afraid that the video would not only show the
kind of person they considered worthy of public honor and acclaim, but
the audience — all staunch members and supporters of the NAACP —
expressing their approval of her admissions of discriminating against
whites.

Was Sherrod improperly fired? Most likely. But it’s becoming clear that she was improperly hired in the first place.

And she was so quickly fired and denounced because the Obama
administration and the NAACP weren’t surprised about who she was, but
that it was revealed so starkly.

http://wizbangblog.com/content/2010/07/27/rushing-to-judgment...