Quantcast

Like it or Not: Mexico is America’s Next Afghanistan

snipe 2010/12/13 03:15:44

With the exception of, perhaps, Texas governor Rick Perry, no public official wants to publicly admit an obvious fact: The United States of America will likely be forced to invade Mexico. It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when. The question then becomes: What to do with Mexico after we invade it
and wipe out the drug cartels (as much as can be). Does the United
States merely return Mexico to a nation state of corrupt politicians,
failed economic policies, and lawlessness, or do we annex Mexico and turn it into the 51st state?


For many of us, there is a certain false security in believing that, since most
of America’s streets are not filled with the murder and mayhem that is
going on just South of our borders, we have nothing to worry about. The
feeling that most Americans likely have is: Well, it’s their problem,
not ours. However, that illusion of security is quickly being eroded
with the stories of American police officers being threatened by Mexican drug cartels, of kidnappings and drug murders in Arizona and Texas, of control of certain parts of Arizona and forays into New Mexico and Colorado by drug cartels, of teenagers being turned into hitmen, and American tourists being kidnapped or killed while on vacation in Mexico.

While America’s national interests are certainly being threatened,
not just by the flood of illegal immigrants, but by the violence that
is beginning to spill across our borders, the Obama administration
chooses to pander to special interests pushing amnesty, while ignoring repeated requests for troops along our Southern border. Moreover, the administration claims about the level of deportations in 2010 have come under scrutiny,
leaving many to wonder if the administration is even remotely serious
about secure borders, or just playing games for the media.


Like it or not, Mexico’s problems are our problems. For decades, politicians in Washington have cowardly turned a bi-partisan blind eye to the economic refugees
(i.e., illegal aliens) that have transgressed our borders until it has
become an unbearable strain upon our economy. Then, rather than
securing our border and addressing the problem, the immigrants are now
being used as political pawns in order to create a huge pool of 8 million progressive voters.


Irrespective of what happens farther down the road, the violence that is occurring today in Mexico and spilling over into the U.S. is something that cannot continue to be ignored by the administration, regardless how weak it may be. If things do not change in Mexico (or if the President refuses to secure our borders),
sooner or later, the U.S. will likely have to send a large amount of
troops into that country to wipe out the drug cartels. Mexico, today,
poses as significant (or more significant) threat to the United States
than Afghanistan and, as a sovereign nation, America has the right to
defend itself and its time the White House (and other politicians) get
honest with the American people about what they intend to do about it.


In the meantime, the Obama administration should stop
playing politics with people’s lives along the border, ‘man up’ and get
Rick Perry and the other Republican governors the troops they need to
keep Americans safe along the border.

LaborUnionReport

Read more:http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2010/12/12/like...
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • b man 2010/12/13 13:50:00
    b man
    +11
    In my opinion borders are defined by how well you defend them from an invading country and well folks. WE HAVE BEEN OCCUPIED!!!!!!

    opinion borders defined defend invading country folks occupied

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • sodabox 2010/12/27 15:58:06
    sodabox
    So, the pope is going to start paying them to get pilot training in the USA so they can fly planes into our buildings so Jesus will give them 72 virgins when they die? Really? O.o
  • mana kai 2010/12/17 22:54:04
    mana kai
    +1
    It's not just invading Mexicans, but also Guatamalians and El Salvadorians. It would be a lot easier to defend Mexico's southern border from South American immigrants than our larger border with Mexico.
  • Gir 2010/12/15 06:04:37
  • mwg0735 2010/12/14 12:41:18
  • dfhjtykyu 2010/12/14 12:32:01
  • chuck 2010/12/14 07:10:31
    chuck
    +1
    Our corrupt government will never overtake Mexico. The industrialists make too much money, and pay too much in campaign contributions to allow this. If America annex's Mexico than they will be instantly protected by our Constitution and privilege to our rights. That means fair taxation, fair wages and unions, an overwhelming investment in infrastructure to accommodate standards of safety, commerce, learning, traffic laws. The list goes on and on. There will be no end to the repairs and clean up costs, and we the tax payers will be stuck with another bill.

    Having said that, I still think it's the best thing. If you really want to help the people of Mexico better there lives, make Mexico a better place to live. The only way to do that will be for America to annex it. Sorry to say that, but I see more truth there than any other way. But I don't think our government will allow that good thing to happen.
  • Claymore Cactus 2010/12/14 06:40:30
    Claymore Cactus
    +2
    Well, I am too old to die young, and leave a good looking corpse, and since I only live 4 miles from the Mexican border, I'll just keep sending reports from the front!

    leave corpse live 4 mexican border ill sending reports
  • Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL 2010/12/14 03:51:52
    Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL
    +3
    HELLO....in case you have noticed......THEY'RE HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! case noticed hereeeeeeeeeeeeeeee MEXICANS IN AMERICA case noticed hereeeeeeeeeeeeeeee MEXICANS IN AMERICA

    .
  • bluejacket 2010/12/14 03:19:33
    bluejacket
    +2
    I think you've stated what should be done. Not what is, or what is going to be done.
    We've already been invaded. Americans getting raped, kidnaped, tortured, killed, no big deal to the 0bama administration, or any of the libs. They are the new Democrat voters!

    "Welcome! come in! Kill all of the Republican voters, and do it quickley, we will give you amnesty, and you can keep all of the plunder from your looting."
  • Bob 2010/12/14 03:08:21
    Bob
    +2
    Who's sh!tn who here. The Administration doesn't want to stop the activities on the southern border. There is too much cronie money being made in the; law enforcement, judicial, prosecutorial, and prison industries by allowing it to continue.
  • FairLady 2010/12/14 02:42:09
    FairLady
    +2
    Snipe I doubt that Obama will invade Mexico. His amnesty intent for the illegals does not agree with the invasion. He knows he will lose the Latinos votes and they are very important to him in 2012.
  • snipe FairLady 2010/12/14 03:19:23
    snipe
    +2
    Good point, and I agree. Obama would like nothing better than to have more come here, not less.
  • FairLady snipe 2010/12/14 03:59:10
  • jackolantyrn356 2010/12/14 02:33:47
    jackolantyrn356
    +2
    Without Hugo and Fidel this Mexico thing is little more than incursion like it was the last time. Oh I forgoit the Drug Cartel is gonna be tough. Our Service men are better trained than that. It will be a matter of the incursion made by "B;lack" Jack Pershing
  • Joves the Instigator 2010/12/14 02:12:21
    Joves the Instigator
    +3
    Well our southern broder should have been militarized years ago. While yes Im not for having what amounts to a DMZ setup in the nation, in this case it is essential to stop the invasion. While I dont see us as having to invade Messico, unless their military crosses our border or fires at our troops. But we do need to secure it and at this point stationing troops on the border is the only option. The poor Border Patrol people are under manned and, over whelmed.
  • tncdel 2010/12/14 02:11:01
    tncdel
    +4
    The over 20 million illegal alien invaders already in the U.S., most of them from Mexico, should be deemed as an act of war. They should all be rounded up as captured enemy infiltrators and subject to punishment by military tribunals, not federal courts.
  • r_u_fin... tncdel 2010/12/14 02:48:33
    r_u_fing_serious
    +2
    I am right there with you on this bro!
  • Rick 2010/12/13 23:26:18
    Rick
    +4
    We have a big problem. On the surface it looks like we should be able to kick the taco's out of Mexico. But they've been getting set up for years with the help of the liberals. Does this look familiar?

    surface kick tacos mexico years liberals familiar Trojan horse
  • mwg0735 Rick 2010/12/14 01:01:51
  • Joves t... mwg0735 2010/12/14 02:07:39
    Joves the Instigator
    +3
    LOL! That was a great statement, that go a laugh out of me.
  • r_u_fin... Rick 2010/12/14 02:50:04
    r_u_fing_serious
    +3
    Yup....looks like a good place to start a bonfire to me! Re-fried beans anyone!!?
  • dlsofsetx 2010/12/13 22:57:23
    dlsofsetx
    +3
    The turmoil there is spilling over the border.
  • Vicbowling 2010/12/13 22:09:40
    Vicbowling
    +2
    The US seems so week these days with our own slew of corrupt politicians,
    failed economic policies, and lawlessness that perhaps America will be annexed by Mexico. At least the banking sector would then have some oversight and behave in a more ethical manner. ;-) Mexerica anyone? If the banks had used association management software to track their derivative bets maybe we wouldn't be in this mess now. Go Mexico, go!
  • r_u_fin... Vicbowling 2010/12/14 02:59:44
    r_u_fing_serious
    +2
    America as a government is weak; however rest assured, that there are cells of Americans that are pissed off, organized and motivated; we will see illegals out of this country....a war is coming; this you can count on.
  • mynameis... 2010/12/13 21:51:47
  • Vezman mynamei... 2010/12/13 22:17:21
    Vezman
    +3
    What?! Have you not been paying attention?

    We do that every year......it's called Spring Break.
  • Captain Kirk~POTL 2010/12/13 21:21:19
    Captain Kirk~POTL
    +5
    All we have to do is close our border,unfortunately none of the last 5 or 6 POTUS have taken it seriously!! Put some troops on that border and it can and would be closed within weeks!! It is amazing how we can keep the border between north and south Korea closed but can`t close our own,it`s because the politicians DON`T want it closed!!
  • snipe Captain... 2010/12/13 21:26:45
    snipe
    +3
    Could it be because neither Korea votes in our elections?
  • Captain... snipe 2010/12/13 21:27:50
    Captain Kirk~POTL
    +3
    Could be,or maybe because the politicians WANT it to be closed in Korea not here!!
  • snipe Captain... 2010/12/14 01:38:27
    snipe
    +3
    Yeah, they want to keep all those new voters pouring in from old Mexico.
  • Captain... snipe 2010/12/14 04:05:29
    Captain Kirk~POTL
    +1
    That`s a fact!!
  • PerpetualThot 2010/12/13 20:57:10
    PerpetualThot
    +5
    I truly despise Mexico.
  • UnusualSuspect 2010/12/13 20:50:52
    UnusualSuspect
    +3
    "...The United States of America will likely be forced to invade Mexico. It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when. The question then becomes: What to do with Mexico after we invade it and wipe out the drug cartels (as much as can be). Does the United States merely return Mexico to a nation state of corrupt politicians, failed economic policies, and lawlessness, or do we annex Mexico and turn it into the 51st state?"

    Laughable...turn it into the 51st state...you paranoid partiers...
  • Perpetu... Unusual... 2010/12/13 20:58:39 (edited)
    PerpetualThot
    +2
    You live in NY. IOW, you have no idea what is going on down in the South and Midwest.
  • snipe Perpetu... 2010/12/13 21:15:49
    snipe
    +1
    He lived in Massachusetts last week. The guy sure gets around.
  • Perpetu... snipe 2010/12/13 21:19:27 (edited)
    PerpetualThot
    +2
    Yes he does.
  • Unusual... Perpetu... 2010/12/13 21:42:25
    UnusualSuspect
    +1
    Yes, I live in NY...but I'm from the midwest, and travel there and in the south a couple times a year, so you don't know a thing about me. And I do have an idea of what's going on down there.

    Do you often make assumptions about other people and how they think? If so, you're probably wrong about them most of the time.
  • Perpetu... Unusual... 2010/12/13 21:43:10 (edited)
    PerpetualThot
    +2
    I make highly informed assumptions about you from the content, or lack thereof, of your posts. I need not see you in person to understand the undertones that flow through your veins. Your insistence that my postulations about your person are incorrect is very much a fantasy of yours. You preach liberal dogma day in, day out. The predication for your stance on issues is do largely in part to what the other (as in right wing) is saying. This is why liberal ideology is not an ideology at all. It means nothing without some perceived, contrived, or actual opposition to bounce itself off of. Have a good one.
  • Unusual... Perpetu... 2010/12/13 21:49:45
    UnusualSuspect
    +2
    LOL...your assumptions, postulations, and predictions are baseless, grounded not in reality but in what you think should be, not what is.
  • Perpetu... Unusual... 2010/12/13 22:35:02
    PerpetualThot
    +1
    I just hope we can still be friends.

    Keep the beard. l was just joshin.

News & Politics

2013/05/23 01:43:00

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals