Liberals finally admit they don't care if abortion kills millions of babies | Are liberals cool with genocide?
FanOreilly
2013/01/24 20:01:41
|
|
|||||
|
69 votes
|
|
79% | |||
|
18 votes
|
|
21% | |||
SALON.COM reports:
I believe that life starts at conception. And it's never stopped me from being pro-choice VIDEO
Read More: http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/so_what_if_abortio...
Top Opinion
-
Dan 2013/01/24 22:11:48Yes liberals are cool with genocide






















"While a precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
So the baby is the nation of baby while it's in the womb. The continent of womb?
Wait a second....
You are a sly one, you meant "imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group" huh.
But see this is referring to imposing measures to prevent birth across the board. In fact there is no measure being imposed upon someone partaking of the action of their own accord.
George Carlin - "Boy, these conservatives are really something, aren't they? They're all in favor of the unborn. The...
"While a precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
So the baby is the nation of baby while it's in the womb. The continent of womb?
Wait a second....
You are a sly one, you meant "imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group" huh.
But see this is referring to imposing measures to prevent birth across the board. In fact there is no measure being imposed upon someone partaking of the action of their own accord.
George Carlin - "Boy, these conservatives are really something, aren't they? They're all in favor of the unborn. They will do anything for the unborn. But once you're born, you're on your own. Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus from conception to nine months. After that, they don't want to know about you. They don't want to hear from you. No nothing. No neonatal care, no day care, no head start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you're pre-born, you're fine; if you're preschool, you're fu***d"
Not to mention being cool with actual genocide carried out in different parts of the globe often subsidized with US tax dollars and in some instances being carried out by US military. Guess conservatives just love the multi-trillion dollar war industry.
You are delusional.
Nice try.
I see you still haven't learned that name-calling doesn't counter arguments, maybe you'll learn it someday if you are still capable.
Hope you'll have something intelligent to say in our next exchange. It's somewhat unlikely, but who knows maybe miracles do happen.
Have a nice life and till next time.
Why not billions?
Why not trillions?
You are insane so instead of debating you I just point and laugh at your absurd comments.
Lol. Debate me? You can't even have a civil discussion with me or anyone who doesn't hold the same views as you do on a subject for that matter. Whatever gave you the idea that you are even capable of debate.
TRILLIONS!
QUADRILLIONS!
That's not even counting the martian abortions!
Here you go
http://www.guttmacher.org/pub...
Since this is an organization with a purpose of advancing the cause of abortion, do you think they might possibly be slanting the statistics, especially since the author of the article, Susan Cohen has a vested interest in promoting abortions?
But she does earn her income from Guttmacher, a non-profit that is partially funded by PP. And she uses her own company as a source of her statistics.
And if you take a closer look, you will find plenty of evidence that suggests that her number are incorrect.
Good luck, and God speed.
EDIT: Ah what the hell...
Should we provided assistance to the murderers to make sure that the victims are dispatched quickly, and the killer doesn't get injured?
It's a shame that their mothers didn't believe in abortion.
We live in a welfare state. Fewer abortions = more welfare. Which do you want: more welfare, or more children who could possibly grow up to become dependent on the state?
anyone? anyone?
ahhhaaahaaaa yeah it was Breakfast Club! 8-P