Quantcast

Liberal San Francisco Pushing Ban on Circumcision. Is this another attack on Religion?

dublin9 2011/02/22 14:34:15
You!
Add Photos & Videos

It seems as if the liberal/progressives never stop in their attack on anything that might have a religious connotation. Christians know about this all too well, where anything having to do with their faith is either scorned or banned.

As usual, ultra liberal
San Francisco is leading the way, taking a more “surgical” approach. It seems that there is an attempt here to criminalize circumcision. If it passes, those caught cutting foreskins would face a fine of $1,000 and a year in prison. Only people over the age of 18 would be allowed to have their foreskins removed, “cutting” to the heart of both Jewish and Muslim religious practices.

This is not a post on whether or not a child should or shouldn’t be circumcised. Please spare me any replies like this. It’s irrelevant. I’m posting a report by the CDC on positive aspects of circumcision in battling AIDS and other diseases because libs always ask for links.

To this writer, the ban is just another unconstitutional atheist/liberal attack on anything that may have some religious connotation. It's part of the war on Christmas, Christ and Crosses.

With this new attack on faith in the form of “pecker persecution,” the liberal/atheists have reached a new, limp, low. Perhaps it’s because they discovered that Jesus was circumcised. Maybe the next thing they’ll do is push for banning displays of mangers. Sorry. They’ve already done that.

CDC Report: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm

Read More: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/politics/116618063....

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Matt 2011/02/22 16:28:27
    Other
    Matt
    +9
    You just can't circumcise a liberal. There's no end to those pricks !

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ☆Hitler was a community org... 2011/02/22 17:03:32
    Government stay out of my life. Leave me and my pecker alone.
    ☆Hitler was a community organiz☆
    +1
    circumcision is not only for the health of the man, but the health and safety of the woman, during sexual intercourse as well
  • ronbo51 2011/02/22 16:52:36
    Other
    ronbo51
    +1
    they all need this diy lobotomy
  • lalouisiane 2011/02/22 16:42:43
    End "pecker persecution" now. America has more important things to worry about
    lalouisiane
    +4
    I'm female ... still I will weigh in on this.

    This seems like a law against the Jewish religion. The government really can't find enough to do?

    Are our government officials just sitting around... looking down and.. thinking... gee... here's something we can get involved in?

    This is bizarre.

    Can we get a countrywide ban on female "circumcision"? Now there's something I consider child abuse and mutilation.
  • dublin9 lalouis... 2011/02/22 16:50:43 (edited)
    dublin9
    +3
    People incorrectly call Female Genitile Mutilation "Circumcision" to make it sound more respectible. It's total mutilation conducted by insecure, primitive men in many Muslim and African countries. It should be banned. It has no relevance to Christian or Jewish cultures and faith. It is a cause of frequent infection and lifelong pain in women forced to undergo the male dominated ritual.
  • lalouis... dublin9 2011/02/22 17:05:03
    lalouisiane
    +2
    I agree, it also sometimes results in the death of the little girls on whom it is performed. I consider it a horrible form of child abuse.
  • ☆Hitler... dublin9 2011/02/22 17:10:00
    ☆Hitler was a community organiz☆
    +2
    yes it is Satan's' counterfeit ritual to make all circumcision illegitimate....fortunately circumcision is no longer "required"
  • carri b... dublin9 2011/02/22 18:43:13
    carri byers
    +1
    It doesn't matter what link to what culture it has - it's mutilation. The functionality of the girls sexual organ is permanently destroyed. That should not be allowed. Circumcision does not impair the penis in any way and is thought by some professionals to be healthier than the alternative. The line needs to be drawn scientifically or it gets very sticky very quickly.
  • cutter's falls 2011/02/22 16:39:33
  • Matt 2011/02/22 16:28:27
    Other
    Matt
    +9
    You just can't circumcise a liberal. There's no end to those pricks !
  • dublin9 Matt 2011/02/22 16:29:22
    dublin9
    +4
    I agree. Liberals can be very "limp."
  • betz Matt 2011/02/22 16:49:23
    betz
    +5
    Beautiful...absolutely beautiful.
  • lalouis... Matt 2011/02/22 17:04:12
    lalouisiane
    +3
    ROFL....
  • carri b... Matt 2011/02/22 18:43:48
    carri byers
    +2
    GOOD ONE!!!
  • Murph Matt 2011/02/22 23:05:24
    Murph
    +1
    Wish I'd said that.
  • George Matt 2011/02/23 22:08:32
    George
    +1
    HA!!!!
    Thats gonna be a classic some day!!!
    Im filing that under "most excellent phrases to remember"!

    ha gonna classic filing excellent phrases remember  excellent
  • Rodney 2011/02/22 16:23:03
    Government stay out of my life. Leave me and my pecker alone.
    Rodney
    +4
    Circumcision is NOT just religious, but also for medical reasons. Little boys often are not taught to wash themselves properly and fungus can grow under that extra skin and create really serious problems. It is best to do it when the boy is a baby then to wait when he is old enough to REALLY feel the pain.
  • cutter'... Rodney 2011/02/22 16:41:45
  • Rodney cutter'... 2011/02/22 16:45:13
    Rodney
    +3
    Of course not. The few gay friends I have say they prefer uncircumcised men. That kind of tells me what is driving this.
  • lalouis... Rodney 2011/02/22 17:05:51
    lalouisiane
    Oh, that's sick!!!
  • Rodney lalouis... 2011/02/22 17:42:07
    Rodney
    +1
    hehehe, need a bag? hehehe bag
  • lalouis... Rodney 2011/02/22 20:17:03
    lalouisiane
    +1
    Yes.. I might.
  • Rodney lalouis... 2011/02/22 21:07:23
    Rodney
    +1
    Sorry, the truth just falls out before my brain thinks sometimes.
  • lalouis... Rodney 2011/02/22 22:45:32
  • ☆Hitler... Rodney 2011/02/22 17:10:54
  • Rodney ☆Hitler... 2011/02/22 17:42:58
    Rodney
    +1
    Didn't mean to make lalouisiane ill. hehe
  • ☆Hitler... Rodney 2011/02/22 18:02:49
    ☆Hitler was a community organiz☆
    +1
    yes...that was nasty
  • I am me 2011/02/22 16:16:55 (edited)
    Other
    I am me
    +3
    Considering that there are some health problems that can occur in males with an uncircumsized penis...It may not happen very often, but it does... I think this law is pretty ludicrous... Even though I don't doubt that there is some religious connotation behind the reasoning... the fact is not allowing a circumcision before the age of 18 can leave a boy in a life time of pain in some cases... and getting a circumcision as an adult can be much more painful (relatively because someone older is more likely to remember the pain than a newborn) and sometimes even detrimental...

    I realize that people have their views on circumcision and that's fine... but it should be left open for those parents that want to choose or to leave it up to their boy...

    *edited for spelling mistake*
  • cutter'... I am me 2011/02/22 16:45:37
  • dublin9 cutter'... 2011/02/22 20:06:18
    dublin9
    Loss of male sensation doesn't disappear with circumcision. Trust me. And I've been told that it's much more pleasureable for women.
  • Wayne 2011/02/22 16:10:02
    Government stay out of my life. Leave me and my pecker alone.
    Wayne
    +3
    It just never ends with these fools! Liberals and progressives are always trying to dictate everyone else 's life. San Francisco has no business telling anyone what to do.
  • Prime Time Lime 2011/02/22 16:01:47
    End "pecker persecution" now. America has more important things to worry about
    Prime Time Lime
    +1
    It should be an option that is chosen by the parents.In other words it should not be the norm,but used only when asked for.
  • teachaman~PWCM~JLA 2011/02/22 15:48:43
    Government stay out of my life. Leave me and my pecker alone.
    teachaman~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    gimme a break! ... just how penis-focused are the perverts in SanFran gonna get?! ...
  • Rodney teacham... 2011/02/22 16:24:16
    Rodney
    +2
    Uhhhh, you have to ask? LOL
  • Striker 2011/02/22 15:44:18
    Other
    Striker
    +2
    Shouldn't we have a 2,000 page LAW on this?
    Did anyone amongst that herd of loonies ask god what he thought?
    ...and what did he say?
    I just HATE waking up to insanity, it's SO confusing.
  • Rodney Striker 2011/02/22 16:25:07
    Rodney
    +1
    Yes, and I am confused everyday. haha
  • cutter'... Striker 2011/02/22 16:48:31
  • Striker cutter'... 2011/02/22 16:59:13
    Striker
    +1
    is reaching, or has already reached?
  • cutter'... Striker 2011/02/22 17:10:44
  • possiblymaybe 2011/02/22 15:39:53
    Other
    possiblymaybe
    +2
    What's not being said here is that there are certain groups (not mentioned in the media) who would like to get FEMALE CIRCUMCISION (which is word semantics, its castration.) permitted! Then the argument became, if it is religious then why not? It's religious to some Muslims and Africans. So why should be people be able to circumcise a boy but not their baby girls?

    [For the record, I do not agree with female circumcision, and I DO think male circumcision should be legal. But it's a very interesting argument.]
  • Shigyrl... possibl... 2011/02/22 15:46:45
    Shigyrl but outspoken on my future
    +2
    Here is an argument against female circumcision. Besides the fact that it is genital mutilation it actually can be detrimental to the health of any child a woman who has been circumcised concieves. Since the labia actually serve as a barrier for the womb from things outside the body. I dare any of those crazy africans to dispute that one.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/31 18:08:21

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals