OK I don't usually put political things on my Facebook page THIS was GOOD.. So I did.. So much TRUTH in a small space.. Since I have a lot of liberal friends they should learn a thing or two.. IF they bother to read it.. KNOWING and I do (having been born and raised in CHICAGO).. Reading the truth is WORSE than cheating on your spouse..
Raider, I think you nailed it pretty well. I'd only add that the make Catholic institutions provide birth control but Muslims get an exemption on 0's health plan in the name of religion. One religion can't get a health care exemption but one can. Another double standard like the fact that Pelosi calls those without insurance free riders but what does she think she is? She doesn't pay for her health care, we do. that makes her a much bigger Free Rider.
No one actually believes any of that, regardless of political ideology. However, instead of paying attention to the real issues of this country just go continue demonizing and smearing all those "liberal strawmen". That is so much more constructive than real discussion.
There are certainly some fine examples of liberal hypocrisy here, but there are also some fine examples of conservative dishonesty and spin. For example, in order...
The "$500,000" spent on one of "numerous vacations" by Michelle Obama. Can we start being honest about this stuff? Michelle and family as well as guests accompanying paid their own way on personal travel expenses for that trip to Spain. Beyond that, the expenses comprising the cited figure are made up of security costs, Air Force One crew, staff and flight expenses, etc. - almost all being things that are paid for at all times by taxpayers regardless of whether or not anyone's on vacation. Finally, I've seen no comparable cost analysis on vacations of past First Ladies by Judicial Watch, the organization who released this information. Is there any reason to think that comparable costs were not incurred by them?
There are certainly some fine examples of liberal hypocrisy here, but there are also some fine examples of conservative dishonesty and spin. For example, in order...
The "$500,000" spent on one of "numerous vacations" by Michelle Obama. Can we start being honest about this stuff? Michelle and family as well as guests accompanying paid their own way on personal travel expenses for that trip to Spain. Beyond that, the expenses comprising the cited figure are made up of security costs, Air Force One crew, staff and flight expenses, etc. - almost all being things that are paid for at all times by taxpayers regardless of whether or not anyone's on vacation. Finally, I've seen no comparable cost analysis on vacations of past First Ladies by Judicial Watch, the organization who released this information. Is there any reason to think that comparable costs were not incurred by them?
Next, Occupy Wall Streeters never murdered their opponents or bombed the businesses they oppose, thus warranting the "potetially violent" label.
Perhaps it's something I'm simply unaware of, but I know of no liberal movement to ban the wearing of the cross.
The Bible can be used and featured in any private school, and no one I know of is arguing otherwise. It's public schools that are at issue, not "any school".
Teenagers are not taught about "every conceivable sexual practice. There are countless sexual practices I could cite here that sex-ed does not discuss, but they would render this far too raunchy a post.
There are a couple other highly questionable and debatable assertions in there as well, but those are some of the doozies. The ones that are accurate make excellent observations though. I wish we could start seeing more focus on honest criticisms and debate than much of the dogmatic rhetoric we constantly get.
I wonder how the leaders of her own Catholic Church are going to feel about being sent to prison for TAX evasion, by refusing to pay for abortions now?
Are you quite done? All you're doing is posting a huge amount of butthurt that no one except your own party will even care about, agree with, or even consider valid.
I'm not responding to replies, since all you'll do is call me a stoner, idiot, or communist. Turn off the Fox News propaganda machine, and look at the facts from both sides. Statistics don't lie, not matter how much you want them to.
The "$500,000" spent on one of "numerous vacations" by Michelle Obama. Can we start being honest about this stuff? Michelle and family as well as guests accompanying paid their own way on personal travel expenses for that trip to Spain. Beyond that, the expenses comprising the cited figure are made up of security costs, Air Force One crew, staff and flight expenses, etc. - almost all being things that are paid for at all times by taxpayers regardless of whether or not anyone's on vacation. Finally, I've seen no comparable cost analysis on vacations of past First Ladies by Judicial Watch, the organization who released this information. Is there any reason to think that comparable costs were not incurred by them?
Two, the Tea Party has earned at least SOME of the charges of racism it's received, by it's members and even leaders taking part in unequivocally racist behaviors such as: http://www.arktimes.com/Arkan... and http://politicalcorrection.or... and http://washingtonindependent.... and http://articles.cnn.com/2009-... and http://www.onewhiteduck.com/2... , etc. This does not mean the Tea Party is racist as a whol...
The "$500,000" spent on one of "numerous vacations" by Michelle Obama. Can we start being honest about this stuff? Michelle and family as well as guests accompanying paid their own way on personal travel expenses for that trip to Spain. Beyond that, the expenses comprising the cited figure are made up of security costs, Air Force One crew, staff and flight expenses, etc. - almost all being things that are paid for at all times by taxpayers regardless of whether or not anyone's on vacation. Finally, I've seen no comparable cost analysis on vacations of past First Ladies by Judicial Watch, the organization who released this information. Is there any reason to think that comparable costs were not incurred by them?
Two, the Tea Party has earned at least SOME of the charges of racism it's received, by it's members and even leaders taking part in unequivocally racist behaviors such as: http://www.arktimes.com/Arkan... and http://politicalcorrection.or... and http://washingtonindependent.... and http://articles.cnn.com/2009-... and http://www.onewhiteduck.com/2... , etc. This does not mean the Tea Party is racist as a whole, but it certainly does illustrate where the charges originate from.
Next, Occupy Wall Streeters never murdered their opponents or bombed the businesses they oppose, thus warranting the "potetially violent" label.
Perhaps it's something I'm simply unaware of, but I know of no liberal movement to ban the wearing of the cross.
The Bible can be used and featured in any private school, and no one I know of is arguing otherwise. It's public schools that are at issue, not "any school".
Teenagers are not taught about "every conceivable sexual practice. There are countless sexual practices I could cite here that sex-ed does not discuss, but they would render this far too raunchy a post.
There are a couple other highly questionable and debatable assertions in there as well, but those are some of the doozies. The ones that are accurate make excellent observations though. I wish we could start seeing more focus on honest criticisms and debate than much of the dogmatic rhetoric we constantly get.
I'm not responding to replies, since all you'll do is call me a stoner, idiot, or communist. Turn off the Fox News propaganda machine, and look at the facts from both sides. Statistics don't lie, not matter how much you want them to.