Quantcast

LET’S STOP THE MADNESS … SUPPORT RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012

Arizona1950 2011/08/16 19:57:36

Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower was a five-star general in the United States Army and the 34th President of the United States. During World War II, he served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe, with responsibility for planning and supervising the successful invasion of France and Germany in 1944–45, from the Western Front. In 1951, he became the first supreme commander of NATO.

A Republican, Eisenhower was a moderate conservative. As President, he concluded negotiations with China to end the Korean War. His New Look, a policy of nuclear deterrence, gave priority to inexpensive nuclear weapons while reducing the funding for the other military forces to keep pressure on the Soviet Union and reduce federal deficits at the same time.

Throughout his presidency, Eisenhower preached a doctrine of dynamic conservatism. His foreign policy was marked by "the brave new world of CIA-led coups and assassinations. It was Eisenhower whose CIA deposed the leaders of Iran, Guatemala, and possibly the Belgian Congo. His administration also planned the Bay of Pigs Invasion to overthrow Fidel Castro in Cuba, which John F. Kennedy was left to carry out.

Mideast and Eisenhower doctrine

Soon after taking office, the Eisenhower administration, in cooperation with the British government, authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to help the Iranian army overthrow Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, and restore the Shah to power.

After the Suez Crisis of 1956 the United States became the protector of unstable friendly governments in the Middle East. Most Arab countries were skeptical about the "Eisenhower doctrine" because they considered "Zionist imperialism" the real danger. They did, however, take the opportunity to take free money and weapons. Egypt and Syria openly opposed the initiative and were supported by the Soviet Union. However, Egypt received American aid until 1967.

The French asked Eisenhower for help in French Indochina against the Communists, supplied from China, who were fighting the First Indochina War. This eventually led us into the Vietnam War.

Relations with Congress

In 1961, Eisenhower became the first U.S. president to be constitutionally prevented from running for re-election to the office, having served the maximum two terms allowed by the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The amendment was ratified in 1951, during Harry S. Truman's term, but it stipulated that Truman would not be affected by the amendment.

He was also the first outgoing President to come under the protection of the Former Presidents Act; two then-living former Presidents, Herbert Hoover and Harry S. Truman, left office before the Act was passed. Under the act, Eisenhower was entitled to receive a lifetime pension, state-provided staff and a Secret Service detail.

LegacyAfter

Eisenhower left office, his reputation declined and he was seen as having been a "do-nothing" President. This was partly because of the contrast between Eisenhower and his young activist successor, John F. Kennedy. Despite his unprecedented use of Army troops to enforce a federal desegregation order at Central High School in Little Rock, Eisenhower was criticized for his reluctance to support the civil rights movement to the degree which other activists wanted. Eisenhower was also criticized for his handling of the 1960 U-2 incident and the international embarrassment, the Soviet Union's perceived leadership in the Arms race and the Space race, and his failure to publicly oppose McCarthyism. In particular, Eisenhower was criticized for failing to defend George Marshall from attacks by Joseph McCarthy, though he privately deplored McCarthy's tactics and claims. Such omissions were held against him during the liberal climate of the 1960s and 1970s.

Although conservatism was riding on the crest of the wave in the 1950s, and Eisenhower shared the sentiment, his administration played a very modest role in shaping the political landscape. Instead of adhering to the party's right-wing orthodoxy, Eisenhower instead looked to moderation and cooperation as a means of governance.

Eisenhower described his position on space and the need for peace during his General Assembly of the United Nations, New York City, September 22, 1960.

"The emergence of this new world poses a vital issue: will outer space be preserved for peaceful use and developed for the benefit of all mankind? Or will it become another focus for the arms race – and thus an area of dangerous and sterile competition? The choice is urgent. And it is ours to make. The nations of the world have recently united in declaring the continent of Antarctica 'off limits' to military preparations. We could extend this principle to an even more important sphere. National vested interests have not yet been developed in space or in celestial bodies. Barriers to agreement are now lower than they will ever be again."

Eisenhower also warned about the emerging military-industrial complex in his Chance for Peace Speech:

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement.

We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. ... Is there no other way the world may live?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • mrk5panzer Arizona... 2011/08/17 15:41:03 (edited)
    mrk5panzer
    +2
    I made myself pretty clear on my opinion about Ron, I do like him but he is just to old. By the way who would be his VP if he should drop dead in his first term? See my point, to many ifs!
  • Arizona... mrk5panzer 2011/08/17 18:54:37
    Arizona1950
    +1
    If you've made yourself clear .. why do you keep responding?

    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
  • mrk5panzer Arizona... 2011/08/17 23:38:35
    mrk5panzer
    Last word syndrome! I'm taking Meds for it. So now am I clear?
    syndrome meds clear
  • Arizona... mrk5panzer 2011/08/17 23:49:06
    Arizona1950


    Am I clear?
  • mrk5panzer Arizona... 2011/08/17 23:58:22
    mrk5panzer
    +1
    I'm hirt! hirt sad
  • none 2011/08/16 23:53:39
    none
    +3
    I don't like his attitude toward Iran and their quest for nuclear weapons, Paul may be a good man but I don't trust him to defend our country.
  • Arizona... none 2011/08/17 06:26:31
    Arizona1950
    +1
    Just why are you so afraid of Iran? Russia, France, Pakistan, India, China, N. Korea, the UK, Israel, all have nukes and some actually have the capability to reach America. Iran doesn't have that kind of range and if they pushed the button to try ... there are a lot of countries who will anniliate them for their stupidity and they wouldn't have to be up close and personal to do it.
  • digitalDave 2011/08/16 23:33:39
    digitalDave
    +2
    I'll support Ron Paul when he stops coddling Iran like an innocent nation. Good post Zona
  • Arizona... digital... 2011/08/16 23:40:11
    Arizona1950
    +4
    Thank you.

    In the words of Eisenhower ...

    "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

    This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement.

    We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. ... Is there no other way the world may live?"
  • digital... Arizona... 2011/08/16 23:49:44
    digitalDave
    +1
    Yes there is another way. In Christ Jesus, standing for His peace and Love, while turning over a few of tables in the bizarre, for evil to exist...

    RP trusts the Muslim leadership, and blames America for their hatred for us, but, clearly in the Quaran they are directed to, and dictated to and are enforced by a works system to destroy everyone who does not comply with their faith.
  • Arizona... digital... 2011/08/17 06:26:54
    Arizona1950
    +1
    Just why are you so afraid of Iran? Russia, France, Pakistan, India, China, N. Korea, the UK, Israel, all have nukes and some actually have the capability to reach America. Iran doesn't have that kind of range and if they pushed the button to try ... there are a lot of countries who will anniliate them for their stupidity and they wouldn't have to be up close and personal to do it.
  • digital... Arizona... 2011/08/17 12:15:06
    digitalDave
    +1
    Their religiosity is sick, evil, twisted and dangerous, no fear though, I'm covered by the Blood of the Lamb. Looking forward to your broadcast tonight.
  • Arizona... digital... 2011/08/17 19:02:33 (edited)
    Arizona1950
    As many think Christianity is sick, evil, twisted, and dangerous but you are correct in that we are covered by the blood of the lamb. Yea though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I will fear no evil comes to mind.

    Yep ... God willing I will be there.
  • POODYLOU ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2011/08/16 23:31:20
    POODYLOU ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +3
    Ron Paul is the only sensible choice, unless you want politics as usual! ron paul choice politics Ron Paul
  • Arizona... POODYLO... 2011/08/16 23:40:22
    Arizona1950
    +1
    I agree.
  • DeeB 2011/08/16 22:34:06
    DeeB
    +4
    Ron Paul 2012!
    ron paul 2012 Ron Paul
  • Arizona... DeeB 2011/08/16 22:36:15
    Arizona1950
    +3
    I hear ya!
  • DeeB DeeB 2011/08/16 22:53:44
  • Arizona... DeeB 2011/08/16 22:59:19
    Arizona1950
    +3
    I haz a happy. :-)
  • DeeB Arizona... 2011/08/17 00:54:21
    DeeB
    +3
    LOL! I could listen to that song all day long!
  • Arizona... DeeB 2011/08/17 19:09:40
    Arizona1950
    +2
    Yep ... it is a great song. :-)
  • DeeB DeeB 2011/08/17 01:15:42
    DeeB
    +3
    A warning from Ron Paul!


  • Old Soldier 2011/08/16 22:26:59
    Old Soldier
    +5
    What would think about this;

    If you like small government you need to work hard at having a strong national defense that is not so militant. Personal liberty is the purpose of government, to protect liberty - not to run your personal life, not to run the economy, and not to pretend that we can tell the world how they ought to live.
  • Arizona... Old Sol... 2011/08/16 22:30:51
    Arizona1950
    +4
    Unless you tell me different I would think you a Ron Paul supporter.
  • Old Sol... Arizona... 2011/08/16 22:35:30
    Old Soldier
    +3
    Haven't decided yet, but this would not be a credit if I lived where you live;

    You wanna get rid of drug crime in this country? Fine, let's just get rid of all the drug laws.

    The man needs to do the some thinking.
  • Arizona... Old Sol... 2011/08/16 22:42:50
    Arizona1950
    +3
    He is a strong supporter of denying Amnesty, denying entitlements, denying free hand-outs. He is a strong supporter of each state being able to handle illegals as they see fit ... He is a strong supporter of not punishing companies if an illegal is found working in their establishment. He would support AZ's SB1070. He supports the police in their efforts by allowing them to ask for legal status when involved in a crime ... and deporting them. He is a strong supporter of putting our troops to work protecting our borders and the American people and not Afganastan or Pakistan and Muslim people.

    I do not have a problem with this ... but I would still like a wall. :-)
  • Old Sol... Arizona... 2011/08/16 23:22:15
    Old Soldier
    +3
    You can't please every one, dear, and that is what he needs to learn. I see nothing wrong with fines for companies where illegals are found working in their establishment, there is a law, OLD law, that prohibits that, so there is no excuses. Here he is after money from companies. As to hand outs I would need a clear explanation of that. Many poor need assistance, but Clinton went after people that need help more than those that didn't. It was a color coded operation, and its time, and past time, to get past the race thing.
  • Arizona... Old Sol... 2011/08/16 23:29:19
    Arizona1950
    +3
    Did you watch the debate? ... don't take my understanding of his word as completely understanding ... but I do believe companies are fined and regulated enough for trying to stay in business. This is the very reason why we don't have any jobs left in this country ... too many find it easier to work overseas.

    Clinton by no stretch of the imagination was a constitutionalist so trying to compare their policies, I think will lead you in the wrong direction.
  • Old Sol... Arizona... 2011/08/17 00:10:48
    Old Soldier
    I did not mention constitution, dear, as welfare programs are not mentioned in it as an enity. That is a gray area, and all races are served in that area, not just one, or even a chosen few, as Clinton and Obama seem to think.
  • POODYLO... Old Sol... 2011/08/16 23:36:55
    POODYLOU ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +3
    What fun is selling legal drugs that are taxed, and suddenly your profits are eaten up? It makes more sense to legalize it, and take the monopoly off the drug market! You want to smoke crack go home and make some, blow yourself up while you are at it. It would open up our prisons to real criminals, and not someone who had just been hurting themselves.
    I think the man has given far more thought than you are willing to give credit!
  • Arizona... POODYLO... 2011/08/16 23:41:18
    Arizona1950
    :-)
  • Old Sol... POODYLO... 2011/08/17 13:24:11 (edited)
    Old Soldier
    Ever heard of a BLACK MARKET? Guns are taxed, but the black market will untax, and even unregister them. I look at some laws as very stupid, because of people's apparently niave understanding of the nature of mankind. That is if it can be washed out, destroyed, or ignored, DO IT!!!

    Drug cartels are prime examples of that.
  • POODYLO... Old Sol... 2011/08/18 00:28:49
    POODYLOU ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +1
    I think actually more importantly to Ron Paul is the use of drugs is not a crime, unless you are breaking the law while on drugs. Locks on doors keep honest people honest. I am not saying Ron Paul is perfect, I am saying he is a far cry better than anything else I have seen. I am sick of the media making up peoples minds. I was told by a guy today that he would vote for Ron Paul, but, politicians and the media would eat Paul alive. He has stuck around how many years without backing down. He doesn't change his vote for the sake of friends, or votes. He is the best possible candidate whether the media the Republicans or the Democrats want to face that fact. People need to stop doing what they have always done, IT AIN'T WORKING FOLKS!!! Ron Paul will turn this Country back into one that it was meant to be. Remember the Constitution/

    We need to go back to the preamble and recommit ourselves!

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
  • Arizona... POODYLO... 2011/08/18 00:39:37
    Arizona1950
    +1
    Thank you ... I wanted to say just that but I couldn't get it to come forward with such clarity and understanding.
  • Arizona... Old Sol... 2011/08/17 06:31:36 (edited)
    Arizona1950
    +2
    He didn't say it in the context of "let's get rid of all drug laws" ... he is talking about decriminalizing. Huge difference ... did criminizing stop drug use? drug cartels? drug abuse? Nope .. all it did was jail a lot of potheads who had no previous criminal records, broke up families, caused hardship and raised our taxes to house, feed, and clothe them for having a joint in their possession.
  • Old Sol... Arizona... 2011/08/17 13:49:32 (edited)
    Old Soldier
    Decriminalizing? Does prescriptions stop the misuse of medical drugs? Drugs can kill if misused. Of course, one can be right in this case from one point of view; decriminalizing will certianly thin out the population. If a person doesn't care about their own life, fine! However, drugies and drunks like to drive, and that puts an ugly twist to the matter.

    I truely wish there was an easy fix to everything, but the Lord was right about one thing, even if people were to ignore the whole Bible this one thing stands out!

    "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."

    Of course, a lot of people would disagree with me. But then, what would be their motive?

    There are a trillion motives in the world, and the word "good" is far and few among them.
  • Arizona... Old Sol... 2011/08/17 18:58:44
    Arizona1950
    +2
    drugs and druggies are still going to drive ... your point?
  • Old Sol... Arizona... 2011/08/17 21:08:42 (edited)
    Old Soldier
    With less or no determent, more will join those that do. There are 16,005 Drunk Driving deaths per year and that is down 44% from 1980, which is the year that MADD was created. Paul’s greatest opposition will be from that origination, and it would be a critical resistance.

    The total deaths in 2009 was 63,846, including officers and agents, but that just covers crack, meth, and other hard drugs, but doesn’t count prescription drugs

    "From 1999 to 2007, the number of U.S. poisoning deaths involving prescription drugs more than tripled, from 4,041 to 14,459. many from opioid analgesic (e.g., oxycodone, methadone, or hydrocodone), These cases may be among the more prominent, but they represent just the tip of the iceberg of damage caused by prescription drugs."

    Imagine what that number would be if these drugs were moved to a Black Market.

    Now, Arizona, I know marijuana is a mild drug, but ask any hard drug user what they started on, and themajority will tell you it was Marijuana or Hash.
  • Katfish Old Sol... 2011/08/17 21:50:43
    Katfish
    +2
    Ending the war on drugs on the federal level, the states will still have their own laws on drugs and driving under the influence.
    Do you not trust your state?
    You have approximately 50 times more voting power on the state level.
  • Arizona... Katfish 2011/08/17 21:51:34
    Arizona1950
    +1
    Thank you ... sometimes I just don't have all the answers. :-)

News & Politics

2013/05/23 05:08:58

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals