Let's get real and stick only to the facts!
media needs to stop showing old pics of both Trayvon Martin and George
Zimmerman. Trayvon at the time of his death was 6 feet tall and 140 lbs.
George was 5'9" and about 150 lbs..the pic they keep showing is from o5
when he was heavier. Tonight on the news they played an audio from a
witness that saw George 24 hrs after the incident and he said he had a
big lump on the bridge of his nose and 2 black eyes and a big bandage on
the back of his head. He said everyone knows bruising from a broken
nose doesn't show up right away..He said George was in a lot of pain and
anyone could see he had been attacked.. Martin was in no way a little angel boy as the
parents want ppl to see..Martin didn't like being followed..But if he felt threatened in any way and or felt he was being unjustly sought out, the normal thing for him to do would have been to call police..They keep saying George kept following although he was told not to..How does anyone know that? And what diff would that possibly make on the fact that Trayvon made the decision to attack George? A witness told police what happened and it was the same story George gave..Why the hell are protesters trying to go above the law? Why are they making this a race case? Why are they automatically assuming George killed Trayvon for absolutely no reason? It's ludicrous and illogical!!!
Why does the media persist in clinging to the notion that Trayvon was
the little 12 year-old child in the old pictures of him they keep
showing? In reality, he had a gold grill in his teeth and was tattooed
up. Trayvon was actually a thug with all the bells and whistles. So
why won’t the media talk about who Trayvon really was?
First, Martin’s school suspension record. According to an investigation by the Miami Herald, Martin was suspended twice -
once in October of last year for graffiti, and prior to the shooting
for possession of a bag with traces of marijuana and a “marijuana pipe.”
Martin was also found in possession of some jewelry and what
the Herald describes as a “burglary tool,” though these items were not
convincingly established as being owned by Martin himself, following an
independent investigation by police.
Both offenses, which would fall under the umbrellas of “vandalism”
and “possession or use of alcohol and/or controlled substances,” would
be sufficient to merit ten day suspensions under district policy.
Martin was apparently also suspended at an indeterminate time in the
past for tardiness and/or truancy, though the Herald does not specify
for how long.
Top Opinion
-
Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/04/01 04:27:28Undecided+15all this tragic incident is...is an excuse to start a race riot, to generate FEAR and Intimidation to scare people into voting for Obama come November...FACTS are the LAST thing the race Baiting Machine wants...they are herding the sheeple ..preparing them for the riot





















It is more an act of convenience to keep showing the same pic, than any sinister plot.
Nobody has an agenda as it has to be decided in court.
Actually there does seem to be one group that has an agenda. The group that keeps trying to convict the dead person because of how he looks.
None of that would be admissable in court.
http://youtu.be/lFWPQOknED0
http://youtu.be/ayr9ulcUVts
Some angry black 20-somethings had gotten together to protect their neighborhood, patrolling at night with guns; a young white guy walking through the neigborhood gets stopped and questioned . . . he freaks out, takes a swing or two out of fear and gets shot to death.
Whattya think? What's your reaction? Whattya wanna do about it?
Really? You support the black guys righteously protecting their families from potentially dangerous outsiders?
Is that what you think?
In my story the young black men were neighborhood watchmen because there had been some break-ins and drug activity, too. And the young white guy was walking through the neighborhood because his divorced dad was there spending time with his girlfriend.
Answer the question.
Please tell me what evidence there is that confirms that Zimmerman did not approach Martin. All I've seen suggests he did.
Zimmerman confronted him with the gun. Martin says he didn't do anything, leave him alone. Zimmerman grabs Martin by the arm, points the gun and tells Martin he's holding him for the police ("they always get away" - "we don't need you to " follow). Martin freaks out and starts struggling and punching. Zimmerman gets hit once or twice, fires.
How is that hard to understand?
That's what a trial is for. Do you think the scene I laid out is impossible? It did sound as if Zim was disgusted that "they always get away", and he did continue to follow. You think it's impossible that he might have decided to use the gun he was carrying to hold Martin for the police that he knew were coming? And then after Martin was shot say that he changed his mind, stopped following Martin and was attacked without provication? And why would martin do that? It seems he may have been a hothead, but to attack a full grown man in a residential street for no reason?
Zim tells his story. Completely believable.
http://youtu.be/lFWPQOknED0
http://youtu.be/ayr9ulcUVts
I didn't think that the police handled this correctly and still don't. Charges have been brought and I'm willing to accept the outcome regardless which way it goes. Personally I think both thought the other was a threat, both stood their ground and the one with a gun won. Now a jury will decide the "winners" fate.
None at all.
The court will decide guilt in this case, no matter what any media does.
The anti-2nd Amendment, racist and leftwing media (with the help of racists Sharpton and Jackson) committed fraud when they doctored photos and recordings to create their race war.
When Zimmerman is found not guilty, the media is hoping for another LA type riot.
He will be acquitted..no doubt about it..Listen to Mark Stein..he is so livid..
http://www.therightscoop.com/...
really was. We all know the media is biased big time...so this casts a BIG shadow on the whole incident.
I saw Martins FB page & Twitter, which has since been scrubbed of all the 'good' stuff. He's NO innocent babe. He was caught w stolen diamond & gold ladies jewelry, a burglary tool & had recently beaten up a bus driver... thats besides his suspensions. So I doubt he spends all of his days asking mom for cash to buy Skittles. Dont bother rebutting unless you have a link w proof.
He will be acquitted..no doubt about it..Listen to Mark Stein..he is so livid..
http://www.therightscoop.com/...