LETS BAN EVERYTHING AND FINE EVERYONE LEGALLY NOTHING IN THIS WORLD IS FREE, NOT EVEN FREEDOM. GO FIGURE HUH. TIME TO FIGHT BACK!
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT OWN A GUN HAS TO PAY A FINE OF $500.00 AND REGISTAR WITH THE GOVERMENT, GIVE UP DRIVER LICENSE NUMBERS, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, BACK GROUND CHECKS AND EVEN REGISTRAR AS A NON PROTECTIVE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND FREEDOM, BECAUSE THEY LACK THE ABILITY TO BE A ACTIVE FIGHTING MEMBER OF THE MILITIA !
ANYONE WHO HAS SKINNY KIDS NEEDS TO PAY EXTRA FOR HEALTH INSURANCE, BECAUSE THEY ARE MORE ACTIVE AND HAVE MORE ACCIDENTS THAT NEED MEDICAL TREATMENT.
ANYONE WHO HAS ELECTRIC CARS NEEDS TO PAY A UNUSE TAX TO SUPPLEMENT THE LOST REVENUE FROM GASOLINE SALES.
ANYONE WHO DOESN'T SMOKE, HAS TO BE FINED TO PAY A UNUSE TAX BECAUSE THEY NEED TO REPLACE THE LOST REVENUES FROM TOBACCO SALES
ANYONE GAY, WHO IS MARRIED HAS TO BE FINED EXTRA, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT PROCREATING THUS THEIR UNCHILDERN WILL NEVER GROW UP AND PAY
ANYONE WHO DOESN'T SERVE IN THE MILITARY NEEDS TO PAY A UN-DEFENDER TAX, TO SUPPLEMENT MILITARY SPENDING BECAUSE WE NEED TO REPLACE THEIR PARTICIPATION IN PROTECTING OUR NATION WITH TECHNOLOGY.
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT OWN A CAR , HAS TO PAY A NON-POLLUTION TAX
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTING THE REST OF US, BY BUYING A BICYCLE, TO REPLACE THE TAXES LOST FROM OIL WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL! THESE ARE JUST A FEW THINGS THAT COST US TAX REVENUE BECAUSE OF THE BLEEDING HEART TREE HUGGING LIBERALS AND PROGRESSIVES!
IN THE NEWS: SOUNDS LIKE A PERFECT IDEA!
In what could be the most extreme interpretation of the Second
Amendment's tricky syntax yet, a Vermont state legislator recently
introduced a bill requiring all unarmed Vermont citizens to pay $500 for
the privilege of not owning a gun.
Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a weapon would be
required to register their name, address, Social Security number, and
driver's license number with the state. Those of military age, with the
exception of police and members of the armed forces, would be required
to pay the $500 fine. Representative Fred Maslack proposed the bill not
to encourage Vermonters to protect themselves against crime (Vermont's
crime rate is very low), but to demand that citizens do their part in
defense of liberty. According to Maslack, "There is a legitimate
government interest in knowing who is prepared to defend the state
should they be asked to do so."
See Votes by State
News & Politics