L.A. Teachers Reduces Pay for Shorter School Year: Good for Education?
Fef
2012/06/17 19:00:41
|
|
|||||
|
13 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
21 votes
|
|
62% | |||
Students may cheer for a shorter school year, but that also means they get 5 days less of education. The teachers union voted to shorten the school year and reduce their salaries. This marks the fourth straight year of reduced school year. Students didn't get to vote.
The LA Times reports:
The LA Times reports:
Members of United Teachers Los Angeles have approved a one-year labor contract that would shorten the school year and reduce pay in exchange for the preservation of more than 4,000 jobs, the union announced Saturday.
Read More: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/06/late...
















Now it is time to try and fix the problem and we ask will the changes be good for education? Maybe another question to ask is how good the education in the LA school district has been anyway.
It will not be up to the parents to step up and supplement the education of their children.
You know you're in trouble when the UNION looks like this....
The public schools in this country have a lot of problems, but a 175-day school year is not one of them.
Once upon a time California had the best public education system in the country. Now it's a joke. And a continual reminder about how the value of government involvement in ed is inversely proportional to educational achievement.
I actually clicked on BAD FOR EDUCATION but I see SH is on the fritz again !
In the meantime, students are learning watered-down, politically-correct curriculum. Break up LAUSD into smaller school districts. Then the curriculum needs to be reworked to extract all the politically-correct nonsense.
Increase the school year and increase their salaries.
However, the whole system should be reworked.
First off, it should be K-10 (not 12) with everything that was included in k-12 included in the k-10 program.
Second, years 11&12 should be a splitting point.
Those that want to go to college go into a 2year junior college program. Then onto a 2 year or 4 year college program which will get them a BA/S or a MA/S.
Those that want to go into a trade go into a trades schooling program for two years and then into an apprentice program at the end of the trade program OR directly into the work force.
The net result will be savings of TWO full years of instruction but the same material will have been given to them at an earlier age where they can absorb it better.
Our current system is setup around the old agricultural society we had, and isn't any more.
Big whoop.
you can't teach people that don't want to learn.. it's a 2 way street.