Do the 50% of Americans that pay no federal income tax care?
Unlikely.
Do the record setting number of Americans that receive government money care?
Probably not.
Do the political activists that will vote Obama no matter what care?
Of course not.
Does not matter what the facts are. 90% of the media will report these bleak numbers as good news. Fox and a few blogs will report it as bad news and most Americans will focus on Matthew McCaunaghey's new baby.
Further, Obama has outsourced millions of jobs to China, etc. Plus also outsourced over 3 million other jobs RIGHT UNDER OUR VERY NOSES, by issuing over 3 million work visas to foreigners legally, in addition to the over a million to illegals.
See:
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
Only as calculated - with endless duplicitous "adjustment" - by the people in the Executive Branch of the U.S. federal government.
Which branch of government is wholly and unequivocally controlled by our Illegal-Alien-in-Chief.
Helping to prove the validity of Godwin's Law, might I ask whether you're familiar with the concept of "the Big Lie"?
When they do, they will say these findings are incorrect.
Obama will say it's on a decline, or explain how it's not increasing is because of him walking on water.
Everyone else will say it's on a rise, because of obama. Or that it is holding steady because we're tired of listening to obama or something unexpectedly stupid.
To thine own self be true
no one is 100% anything.
http://portalseven.com/employ...
Oh, it's a boatload worse than that.
Y'see, the jobs our Marxist Mystery Messiah supposedly "created" were almost all unproductive efforts for which there was no sustained (or sustainable) demand in the U.S. economy.
For example, the "stimulus" money allocated to local and state government agencies (to do things like continue the employment of objectively worthless teachers whose salaries could not be paid by local and state tax revenues) merely deferred inevitable layoffs.
What our Fraudulence-in-Chief and his equally idiotic advisers had obviously planned for was a temporary and purely cosmetic "fix" that he thought would benefit his own socialist-suck-up constituents while giving the illusion that his insane and stupid policies were working.
In actuality, of course, everything Barry was doing - and I mean EVERYTHING - was just f*cking up the economy even more hideously, preventing the recovery for which he was hoping.
Emphasis on "Hope," of course.
So we got the "Change" that had to result.
Not that you weren't warned back in 2008 that this was going to happen, right?
Which means that unless we elect a genuine constitutionalist - such as Ron Paul - in place of our Marxist Messiah, the hideous policies perpetrated by Barry the Bastard will continue to punish our nation through the first half of 2013 even if we were to see the Kenyan Keynesian dragged from the Oval Office in manacles and ankle chains (as he amply deserves) next January.
Not that any of us can repose any trust in the Etch-A-Sketch to act consequently to enforce the U.S. Constitution should the Republican Party succumb to their "establishment" oligarchy's suicidal stupidity and nominate that Mormon mamzer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Nope. No "almost" at all.
When credit rating agencies downgrade U.S. Treasury debt instruments, you ARE in a depression.
No doubt about it.
1. Learn to use paragraphs.
2. Take a few basic spelling/grammar classes.
3. Caps Lock is NOT your friend.
First, you claim Obama is still blaming Bush for his overspending, when in fact, Obama has a much lower spending record than both Bushes, Clinton and even Reagan. It's funny how Republicans brand liberals as "tax and spend" when they spend less than their Republican counterparts.
Obama did not take away the space program, the House has power of the purse, they control all our money. Republicans are the ones who killed NASA.
The entire economy is the result from 30 years of failed policy. This all started under Reagan, and it finished at the end of Bush's second term. Reagan drastically cut taxes and deregulated very smart regulations that prevented this kind of thing. Clinton's treasury secretary Robert Rubin proposed legislation to congress and President Clinton that would repeal the Glass-Steagall Act. The Clinton Administration and Congress both passed the Law, and set up the ground work for the biggest financial meltdown since October 29,1929. When Bush cut taxes in 2001 and 2004, but sent us into both Afghanistan and Iraq, the country was doomed. When the crash finally hit, the Government didn't have enough money ...
1. Learn to use paragraphs.
2. Take a few basic spelling/grammar classes.
3. Caps Lock is NOT your friend.
First, you claim Obama is still blaming Bush for his overspending, when in fact, Obama has a much lower spending record than both Bushes, Clinton and even Reagan. It's funny how Republicans brand liberals as "tax and spend" when they spend less than their Republican counterparts.
Obama did not take away the space program, the House has power of the purse, they control all our money. Republicans are the ones who killed NASA.
The entire economy is the result from 30 years of failed policy. This all started under Reagan, and it finished at the end of Bush's second term. Reagan drastically cut taxes and deregulated very smart regulations that prevented this kind of thing. Clinton's treasury secretary Robert Rubin proposed legislation to congress and President Clinton that would repeal the Glass-Steagall Act. The Clinton Administration and Congress both passed the Law, and set up the ground work for the biggest financial meltdown since October 29,1929. When Bush cut taxes in 2001 and 2004, but sent us into both Afghanistan and Iraq, the country was doomed. When the crash finally hit, the Government didn't have enough money to intervene, and had to go to the American people for a bailout.
The new Healthcare bill isn't really a tax, it's a penalty that's qualified as a tax. If you get basic healthcare, you don't have to pay it. I also love how you highlighted the "NEW TAX" portion of it, you and your friends are going to have a hayday with that one aren't you? I want someone better in office too, but there isn't anyone better that's running. Obama is still the best choice for President regardless of his mediocre economic record. I could stand here and blame House Republicans all I like, but it won't do a bit of good for my argument. Obama isn't the savior we hoped for, so what? I certainly don't see a savior on the other wing. I see Bush's failed policies coming back to haunt us.
Actually, that's not true.
Given the way the presidency has grown (and I think the word "cancerously" definitely applies) in effectively unrestrained power, one man acting as our federal government's chief executive could DEFINITELY "clean up this mess."
One man prepared to act in conscientious determination to enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution could and would shut down most federal spending, even summarily abolishing whole Cabinet departments.
The President, after all, has the unimpeded lawful authority to take such measures in hand, and some previous Presidents (emphasis on Grover Cleveland, a Democrat for pity's sake) had indeed done so. No constitutional crisis about it.
A single man in the Presidency could open up the Federal Reserve System like a can of cheap dog food and spread it out for exacting public scrutiny.
A single individual serving as a law-abiding President could withdraw U.S. troops from all foreign posts and obligations not conducted according to formal treaties approved by the U.S. Senate, thereby reducing both "defense" expenditures and the risks of disease and death among our service people.
A solitary American determined to fulfill the presidential oath of office coul...
Actually, that's not true.
Given the way the presidency has grown (and I think the word "cancerously" definitely applies) in effectively unrestrained power, one man acting as our federal government's chief executive could DEFINITELY "clean up this mess."
One man prepared to act in conscientious determination to enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution could and would shut down most federal spending, even summarily abolishing whole Cabinet departments.
The President, after all, has the unimpeded lawful authority to take such measures in hand, and some previous Presidents (emphasis on Grover Cleveland, a Democrat for pity's sake) had indeed done so. No constitutional crisis about it.
A single man in the Presidency could open up the Federal Reserve System like a can of cheap dog food and spread it out for exacting public scrutiny.
A single individual serving as a law-abiding President could withdraw U.S. troops from all foreign posts and obligations not conducted according to formal treaties approved by the U.S. Senate, thereby reducing both "defense" expenditures and the risks of disease and death among our service people.
A solitary American determined to fulfill the presidential oath of office could easily shut down the Internal Revenue Service and pink-slip every one of those thugs, absolving Americans of the unlawful obligation to pay an unapportioned direct tax on their wages, salaries, commissions, profits, inheritances, and (for God's sake!) tips.
All that and more can be accomplished by ONE man in the Presidency.
Which makes Barry the Bastard's "Hope" and "Change" even more disgusting, doesn't it?
Naturally, any improvement will be labeled as the result of his life saving policies.
Hey, there's nothing to worry about on that score.
Nothing our Magical Mystery Mulatto Marxist has ever done - in all his purposefully hidden and fraudulent little life - could have ANY beneficial effect on the U.S. economy.
taxpayer money since he was little, He hates America, but wants the Olympics in Chicago, but now he lost that, He went to other Countries and told them we do not believe in GOD. SHame on Him. He should of been so proud, but he just hates America, yet the everyday person who has grown up here, I love america, is it perfect,
nothing is perfect expect the Kingdom of Jesus Christ Our Lord and Savoir, who is
KING.
He probably blames Bush instead of that crook Dodd who is really responsible for this mess for continuing to lend money to the banks making things worse!!!