Quantcast

Judgment Day!

Prairie Wind 2012/06/28 05:45:33


Barack Obama faces Judgment Day today as the Supreme Court is set to announce whether his healthcare reform will be struck down and Attorney General Eric Holder faces being held in contempt of Congress.

Having spent his first 14 months in office on achieving Obamacare, for the former constitutional law lecturer to see his signature reform declared unconstitutional would be a humiliating blow.

In ramming the bill through Congress, Obama failed to secure a single Republican vote, thereby shedding his campaign image as a bipartisan uniter. Although passing the bill was a legislative victory, the reform itself has proved to be a political millstone.

The censure of Holder, in which a number of Democrats are poised to join Republicans, would also be a major embarrassment because Obama has claimed executive privilege, something he blasted his predecessor George W. Bush for doing.

Republicans on Capitol Hill have pursued Holder tenaciously over the botched ‘gun walking’ sting operation in which thousands of weapons were allowed into Mexico and into the hands of drug criminals. Two of the weapons were found at the murder scene of border agent Brian Terry.

With the Supreme Court Justices peppering Obama’s lawyer with hostile questions about Obamacare and Republicans united and in control of the House of Representatives, the White House is bracing itself for a dismal day.

Obama faces a Catch-22 situation over the Supreme Court ruling. If the legislation is upheld, presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney can run on repealing it if he’s elected – an almost sure-fire crowd pleaser.

But if Obamacare – formally named the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – is struck down in whole or in part then Obama will look like a failure as well as a President who has exceeded his powers.

A split decision might be the worst outcome for him as full rejection would force Republicans to come up with an alternative plan and full support would hand Romney a popular rallying cry for repeal.

Obama’s planned strategy for the reform being struck down was to condemn the Supreme Court justices as being controlled by a partisan core of Right-wingers.

But that has been undermined by this week’s split ruling over the Arizona immigration law in which conservative Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a majority opinion that largely backed the Obama administration.

Judgment Day for Obama comes at a perilous moment for him. He faces a brewing rebellion among Democrats who are refusing to attend the national convention in September where he is due to be crowned as his party’s nominee.

At least three Democratic senators and eight members of the House of Representatives have said they will not attend the party festivities in Charlotte, North Carolina – a clear sign that they view the Obama brand as toxic.

Among those who will stay at home is Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, who was virtually attached to Obama’s hip on his campaign plane in 2008.

Representative Steve Israel, head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, urged all democratic candidates to stay away, saying: ‘If they want to win an election, they need to be in their district.’

Although Obama leads nationally by three per cent in the RealClearPolitics national average, undecided voters tend to break decisively against incumbents and there are a number of alarming underlying factors for the President.

In the latest NBC/WSJ poll, 49 per cent felt less optimistic about the economy as a result of recent news, 53 per cent disapproved of Obama’s handling of the economy and a whopping 61 per cent felt the United States was moving in the wrong direction.

Although Obama retains some strength in swing states and has boosted himself with Latino voters because of his recent decisions to allow up to 800,000 young illegal immigrants to stay in the US, his numbers in each of those key categories have slipped since the last NBC/WSJ poll.

Obama faces criticism from the Left over his aggressive drone strike policy in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Jimmy Carter, the former President who backed him over Hillary Clinton in the 2008 primaries, this week wrote that the US under Obama was ‘abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights'.

Carter charged: ‘Revelations that top officials are targeting people to be assassinated, including American citizens, are only the most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nation's violation of human rights has extended.’

The unusual criticism from a former President comes just weeks after Bill Clinton stated that Romney had a ‘sterling’ business record and that the work of Bain Capital, Romney’s former private equity firm, was ‘good work’.

Clinton’s words undercut the centrepiece of Obama’s attacks on Romney – which have led to his campaign vastly overspending, even as Romney outraises him – which have been that he is a corporate predator who has made profits out of cutting jobs.

Senior Romney officials, however, believe that the attacks only emphasise that the Republican was a hugely successful businessman whereas Obama, who has never held a job in business, has presided over an economy in which unemployment has just risen to 8.2 per cent.

The day should get interesting! Time for popcorn and soda while watching these fireworks!

Read More: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165770/Ju...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ★Calliope★ 2012/06/29 00:37:20
    ★Calliope★
    +1
    I think someone was horribly intimidated/blackmailed.

    They had to twist and redefine 'tax' to do it. Shady arm twisting. Legislating from the benches.
  • Christian 2012/06/28 19:31:53
    Christian
    Is it possible to hold off judgement day just a bit longer please. I am not ready to be judged yet.
  • ScottyG - Faqueue 2012/06/28 18:56:09
    ScottyG - Faqueue
    +4
    Justice Roberts just did the Republicans a huge favor. He insured a win in November. Now we will have the POTUS, House and Senate.

    You see, the TAX mandate is not collectable or enforceable and the single biggest, least wanted tax to ever be created. 70% of Americans DON'T want the mandate and as a tax they will HATE IT.

    The States don't have to comply with expansion. SO they will get their funding even when they refuse to expand medicare and medicade. There goes the ability to make States comply and kills the funding issue.

    Thanks Justice Roberts, you just became my new hero.

    This makes Romney a shoe in for POTUS.
  • Prairie... ScottyG... 2012/06/30 04:48:27
    Prairie Wind
    +3
    You're thinking short term. This ruling legitimizes taxes on negative actions. Before this they taxed on income and financial activity, now it's taxing you on not doing something. This is your long term chaos. The short term chaos is throwing the borders open and giving all "free" health care, but the reality is that the health care is not free.

    The precedence is that regardless of whatever administration is in there, the anarchists just got a free gift and you have continual division of everything including people and country, because it will not depend upon the Constitituion, Rule of Law and Equality under the Law, but upon whose party gets in at any time.

    This illustrates the difference between a Republic and a pure Democracy. Under a Republic, everybody has certain inalienable rights with the rest being voted upon. Under a pure Democracy, it will depend upon the party in power. In other words, a pure Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting upon what's for lunch. This describes the differences.


  • ScottyG... Prairie... 2012/06/30 14:00:20
    ScottyG - Faqueue
    +1
    But isn't the short term what the focus is? This all but guarantees a win for Romney because he vows to repeal.

    If the democrats had known this was a tax to begin with, they never would have pushed it through.

    It's not just conservatives that hate the idea of paying the biggest single tax in history to the middle class, it's the moderate democrats and independents.

    Reuters Poll: 73% of Independents Oppose Obamacare
    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfr...

    Obie can kiss his ass goodbye. And to repeal the Senate will go republican as well.
  • Prairie... ScottyG... 2012/06/30 18:41:39
    Prairie Wind
    The short term is repealing the mandated tax of Obama Care as ruled by Justice Roberts by electing another candidate in place of Obama. Realize that Obama already had the authority to imposed taxes, but denied this was a tax, not only to the public, but also to the Supreme Court. This was among the first questions asked of Obama's lawyer and he denied this was a tax. Had he said yes, it would have gone no further for ruling by the Supreme Court, because they already had the authority.

    However, Justice Roberts rewrote the bill, identifying it as a mandated tax, but the act of his ruling established the long term precedence of imposing taxes not on income and financial activity, but now on the basis of not doing anthing. Until the Constitution is amended to reverse the ruling, any political administration can edict what they want, regardless of what you do. That's how this ruling has changed us from a Republic to a Democracy, and that's why Obie is a short term problem.

    Look at the YouTube video again for the differences and consider what has happened. That's where the long term problem becomes obvious.
  • Wag 2012/06/28 17:03:20
    Wag
    +5
    Admit it Republinuts, You went up against a proffesor of the Constitution and got your asses kicked, even a conservative judge couldn't shoot it down. You all will see this is a good thing. Now go lick your wounds and come back and spin the hell out of it, and get ready for Nov. Have a nice day....oh yeah that Holder thing is a re run of the Ken Star fiasco.....In the end the people will reject CRAZY



    knock out punch
  • Prairie... Wag 2012/06/28 17:39:10
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    Now, you get to pay for it.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 23:49:59
    luvguins
    Nope.
  • Always ... Wag 2012/06/28 21:36:15
    Always Right
    +1
    You're right about one thing! In the end the people will reject CRAZY!
  • Theresa 2012/06/28 15:09:28 (edited)
    Theresa
    +6
    People the verdict on the Constitutionality of the Health Care Law is in. The SCOTUS upheld the law! The tyranny is now complete! There are no longer any Constitutional Rights! The Gov't can and will do anything it wants! This is the End of the Republic! The only way left is to remove the congress that allowed this monstrosity to occur!
  • luvguins Theresa 2012/06/28 23:51:07
  • Theresa luvguins 2012/06/29 04:37:00
    Theresa
    +1
    Actually You have it wrong it is a Drama Llama!
  • Al Thompson, R.E.A., C.E.I. 2012/06/28 15:08:24
    Al Thompson, R.E.A., C.E.I.
    +4
    OBAMACARE WAS UPHELD AS CONSTITUTIONAL! .WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR GREAT COUNTRY. The USA is being infested with Marxists. This insanity must be stopped!
  • luvguins 2012/06/28 14:55:14
  • Al Thom... luvguins 2012/06/28 15:09:43
    Al Thompson, R.E.A., C.E.I.
    +3
    BS -- These 9 people as a whole just ruined this country by upholding Obamacare.
  • luvguins Al Thom... 2012/06/28 15:26:54
    luvguins
    +3
    They followed the Constitution apparently upheld by the right's Chief Justice in fact.
  • Prairie... luvguins 2012/06/28 15:18:48
    Prairie Wind
    +3
    Now, you pay for it.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 15:28:39
    luvguins
    +2
    You are on Medicare which all should really have.
  • Prairie... luvguins 2012/06/28 15:51:19
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    And I still pay a monthly premium for Medicare, it's not free and you have to meet each year an sum of medical expenses before the limitations of Medicare even assist payment of my cost. If won't be any different for you when you hit 65.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 16:16:59
    luvguins
    +2
    It is cheaper than private health insurance and keeps doctors and hospitals from gouging you if uninsured.
  • Prairie... luvguins 2012/06/28 17:05:14
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    It's limited, but you may not know be old enough to know that, plus coverage for supplies and services are being reduced from that available five years ago.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 17:43:37
    luvguins
    +1
    Not from the ads I see on TV to get diabetic, respiratory, and battery run chairs supplies on TV.
  • Prairie... luvguins 2012/06/28 18:11:04
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    You have an opportunity to experience yet beyond watching television ads and that's walking in to purchase what you need, then finding out what you really have to pay for it. That's the difference between facade vs actual experience.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 18:56:00
    luvguins
    +1
    I get my meds from where they are 50-60% cheaper for the same brands. My Medicare friends have been denied nothing as they have supplements too.
  • Lady Wh... luvguins 2012/06/28 17:21:47
    Lady Whitewolf
    +2
    hear ya
  • Smitten... luvguins 2012/06/28 15:20:08
  • Prairie... Smitten... 2012/06/28 15:52:38
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    Yet, naive. Medicare is not free.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 16:17:22
    luvguins
    +3
    No insurance is free.
  • Smitten... luvguins 2012/06/28 17:00:44
  • Prairie... luvguins 2012/06/28 17:15:40
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    Yes, not having any expenditure is free until you need it, that's the consequence of considering risk. However, medical providers for services and supplies will negotiate lesser costs to you when paying in cash, because Government isn't an element of their operating costs.

    You just have to anticipate what your needs are and make your own decisions what you feel is best for you, rather having it mandated, regardless of your need. Obama's bill is a way of exerting power over you and forcing you to purchase a service regardless of your needs.
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 17:46:34
    luvguins
    +1
    250 million already have health insurance. 30 million now have the chance to get it. The ones with it aren't be forced to buy what they aleady have.
  • Prairie... luvguins 2012/06/28 18:15:36
    Prairie Wind
    +1
    Your source of verifiable fact?
  • luvguins Prairie... 2012/06/28 18:57:27
    luvguins
    +1
    People with health insurance who are my friends also are not going to lose their insurance. Big myth.
  • Always ... luvguins 2012/06/28 21:46:46
    Always Right
    +1
    Won't they be surprised! Lying marxist liberals need to go talk to a health insurance company, then they'll hear the truth!
  • luvguins Always ... 2012/06/28 22:04:24
    luvguins
    No, we won't be surprised. Right wing myth and demagoguery. Sore loser much? LOL. http://rlv.zcache.com/cheese_...
  • Always ... luvguins 2012/06/28 22:52:03 (edited)
    Always Right
    +1
    What no facts to back your weak argument? The Supreme Court's decision today was 0bama and the martist liberal's political death panel!
  • luvguins Always ... 2012/06/28 22:57:02
    luvguins
    In your dreams, loser. Many hypocrites on the right are using the early benefits. Women will love it as their premiums won't be higher. You lose
  • Always ... luvguins 2012/06/28 23:22:59
    Always Right
    Let's get one thing straight, they did not reform health care, they made it mandatory for all US citizens to buy health insurance. It's health insurance, not health care! Did you see anything in this mandate that changes anything doctors or hospitals do?
  • luvguins Always ... 2012/06/28 23:44:05
    luvguins
    250 million already have health insurance but will get more health benefits and preventive care covered.

    Obamacare

News & Politics

2013/05/23 01:10:44

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals