Judge Shuts Down Restrictive Florida Voter Registration Rules
ProudProgressive
2012/06/01 03:49:01
It is truly gratifying to see that at least some of our nation's judges still consider the right of American citizens to vote to be an important thing, something to be aided and encouraged, not blocked by any means necessary. The Right Wing fears a free and fair election more than almost anything else, but if our nation's judiciary stands strong, democracy may yet survive the latest attempted hostile takeover.
Article excerpt follows:
Judge Shuts Down Restrictive Florida Voter Registration Rules
By Kenneth Quinnell
May 31, 2012 06:00 PM
As part of a broader assault on the voting rights of Floridians, Gov. Rick Scott signed into law a bill in 2011 that placed severe restrictions and penalties on third party groups that attempt to register new voters. A federal judge ruled Thursday that the law was unconstitutional.
The second, less-well-known effort, is a new set of Florida state rules that make it very difficult to register new voters, and create severe penalties for anyone who doesn't precisely comply with them. These rules are so onerous that many groups that formerly routinely ran voter registration drives, like the League of Women Voters, stopped doing it because they found the new rules were impossible to comply with.
Now, thanks to a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters of Florida, Florida Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, and Rock the Vote, a federal judge in Tallahassee, no hotbed of liberalism, has issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of key parts of the voter-registration-suppression scheme:
"The statute and rule impose a harsh and impractical 48-hour deadline for an organization to deliver applications to a voter registration office and effectively prohibit an organization from mailing applications in. And the statute and rule impose burdensome record-keeping and reporting requirements that serve little if any purpose, thus rendering them unconstitutional even to the extent they do not violate the [National Voting Rights Act]."
Via press release, numerous groups applauded the ruling:
"Today's ruling is a clear victory for Florida voters," said Lee Rowland, counsel for the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, one of the attorneys who argued the case for the Plaintiffs. "The Florida legislature has tried repeatedly to stifle access to voter registration opportunities. By halting onerous provisions of the law, the court has stood up for voters and for civic groups across the state helping Floridians register to vote."
The Brennan Center for Justice, which represented the groups in the lawsuit, will hold a media conference call at 4:00 PM EST to discuss the decision. Please dial 800-651-2087, and use the passcode 32594759. Representatives from the League of Women Voters, Rock the Vote, and Florida PIRG will also be on the call.
"For over 72 years, League volunteers have faithfully and successfully helped to register eligible Florida voters," explained Deirdre Macnab, President of the League of Women Voters of Florida. "We are hopeful that this ruling will enable us to continue this important work. Florida's anti-voter law creates impassable roadblocks for our volunteers, who are simply trying to bring fellow citizens into our democratic process. We are grateful the court recognized that the Constitution does not tolerate these types of barriers to civic participation and voter registration."
"As the nation's largest young voter organization, we've dedicated more than two decades to educating and empowering young people to participate in our nation's democracy," stated Heather Smith, President of Rock the Vote. "Rock the Vote has encouraged hundreds of thousands of young Florida residents to have a voice in their community and country. Today's ruling is a victory for them, and for our democracy. We will quickly assess whether this ruling will allow us to restart our critical voter registration work on the ground in Florida."
"Our representative democracy relies on an engaged citizenry, yet voter turnout in Florida remains far too low," added Brad Ashwell of the Florida Public Interest Research Education Fund. "That's why we work to sign up thousands of first time voters across the state each election cycle. We are pleased the court froze the majority of this law, so we can continue to fulfill this mission."
"We are pleased that our clients and civic groups all across the State of Florida demonstrated the intimidation and threat of punishment created by this unconstitutional law," said Robert Atkins, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP representing the plaintiffs.
"This is a resounding victory for the Constitution and Florida citizens against a clear attempt to suppress political participation," added Howard Simon of the ACLU of Florida.
Article excerpt follows:
Judge Shuts Down Restrictive Florida Voter Registration Rules
By Kenneth Quinnell
May 31, 2012 06:00 PM
As part of a broader assault on the voting rights of Floridians, Gov. Rick Scott signed into law a bill in 2011 that placed severe restrictions and penalties on third party groups that attempt to register new voters. A federal judge ruled Thursday that the law was unconstitutional.
The second, less-well-known effort, is a new set of Florida state rules that make it very difficult to register new voters, and create severe penalties for anyone who doesn't precisely comply with them. These rules are so onerous that many groups that formerly routinely ran voter registration drives, like the League of Women Voters, stopped doing it because they found the new rules were impossible to comply with.
Now, thanks to a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters of Florida, Florida Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, and Rock the Vote, a federal judge in Tallahassee, no hotbed of liberalism, has issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of key parts of the voter-registration-suppression scheme:
"The statute and rule impose a harsh and impractical 48-hour deadline for an organization to deliver applications to a voter registration office and effectively prohibit an organization from mailing applications in. And the statute and rule impose burdensome record-keeping and reporting requirements that serve little if any purpose, thus rendering them unconstitutional even to the extent they do not violate the [National Voting Rights Act]."
Via press release, numerous groups applauded the ruling:
"Today's ruling is a clear victory for Florida voters," said Lee Rowland, counsel for the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, one of the attorneys who argued the case for the Plaintiffs. "The Florida legislature has tried repeatedly to stifle access to voter registration opportunities. By halting onerous provisions of the law, the court has stood up for voters and for civic groups across the state helping Floridians register to vote."
The Brennan Center for Justice, which represented the groups in the lawsuit, will hold a media conference call at 4:00 PM EST to discuss the decision. Please dial 800-651-2087, and use the passcode 32594759. Representatives from the League of Women Voters, Rock the Vote, and Florida PIRG will also be on the call.
"For over 72 years, League volunteers have faithfully and successfully helped to register eligible Florida voters," explained Deirdre Macnab, President of the League of Women Voters of Florida. "We are hopeful that this ruling will enable us to continue this important work. Florida's anti-voter law creates impassable roadblocks for our volunteers, who are simply trying to bring fellow citizens into our democratic process. We are grateful the court recognized that the Constitution does not tolerate these types of barriers to civic participation and voter registration."
"As the nation's largest young voter organization, we've dedicated more than two decades to educating and empowering young people to participate in our nation's democracy," stated Heather Smith, President of Rock the Vote. "Rock the Vote has encouraged hundreds of thousands of young Florida residents to have a voice in their community and country. Today's ruling is a victory for them, and for our democracy. We will quickly assess whether this ruling will allow us to restart our critical voter registration work on the ground in Florida."
"Our representative democracy relies on an engaged citizenry, yet voter turnout in Florida remains far too low," added Brad Ashwell of the Florida Public Interest Research Education Fund. "That's why we work to sign up thousands of first time voters across the state each election cycle. We are pleased the court froze the majority of this law, so we can continue to fulfill this mission."
"We are pleased that our clients and civic groups all across the State of Florida demonstrated the intimidation and threat of punishment created by this unconstitutional law," said Robert Atkins, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP representing the plaintiffs.
"This is a resounding victory for the Constitution and Florida citizens against a clear attempt to suppress political participation," added Howard Simon of the ACLU of Florida.
Read More: http://crooksandliars.com/kenneth-quinnell/judge-s...





















In NJ, when I first registered years ago, I was given a 'voters' registration card' with a little American flag in the corner. It was to be used at the polls in case a poll worker 'challenged' you. Then, somewhere along the line, 'challenging became 'illegal' and no more cards were given out. Well, when I moved to a different city, I had to re-register and guess what? I was given my precious little 'voters registration card'. I have never had the opportunity to use it though.
My question: why doesn't everyone have a voters registration card?
In Ohio in 2004, the GOP Sec. of State made sure that polling places around Cleveland wouldn't have enough voting machines for the amount of people who wanted to vote. Consequently, instead of waiting in line for hours and hours, people walked away. In the rural areas and the suburbs of Cincy voters were told the polling places had been relocated.Of course, the classic case of indirect voter suppression was the "Brooks Brothers Riot" in Dade County Florida in 2000 where a cadre of GOP goons disrupted the election board from counting ballots.
Voter fraud is a small player in elections now, especially given the Republican cheerleading for Citizens United. Hundreds of millions of dollars from anonymous donors will erode voter confidence much faster than what occurs at polling places. That is the narrative we should pursue...CU negates voter authenticity far more than a million Black Panthers could ever do.
i don't think that anyone wants anything BUT a free and fair election. the democrats seem to want a little slop in who signs up. the republicans seem to want an accurate list.
i'm not sure where the trouble is.
where is the intimidation? making them go to a DMV to get a picture ID? or the act of having to show ANY sort of ID at the polls when we are other wise required to show ID for any number of things in real life.
yeah. this judge is a genius. he ought to fit right into a 9th circuit court...
Having a checking account is a privilege, not a right. Renting movies is a privilege, not a right. You must follow whatever rules that may be imposed to utilize a privilege.
Voting is a right. These nitwits need to learn the difference.
why not vote 20 times then?
i toyed with the idea of voting 3 times, but i chickened out. how many people don't chicken out?
with no ID required i could vote using either one of their names.
as far as Project Veritas goes, those weren't doctored videos. its THAT easy to get an illegal ballot AND VOTE IT in NH.
it was so embarrassing the the NH Sec of State put out an arrest warrant for the guy for tampering in an election. he won't come back to NH because he fears being served/arrested.
in NH, you can same day register.
in NH, there is no need for voter ID. that's why Project Vertias had such an easy time of it.
if i was so inclined, and wasn't an elected official in my town, i could vote as many times as i liked. all i would need is a list of dead people or people that moved out of town. heck. if i REALLY had a set, i could use my neighbors names. now THAT would be interesting.
and you are expressing feelings. not knowledge.
even so, our democrat governor thinks that a picture ID requirement might be too onerous.
You don't to present an ID to be tried. All you have to do is present evidence. Or you can sit there and do nothing if you want, like Charles Manson.
Arrive on time
Dress appropriately
Bring proper ID
Don't bring any weapons
Stay behind the bar
Stand when the judge enters & leaves
Answer when asked
Stay quiet / do not disrupt
etc.
I think that showing an ID is a small price to pay for right to cast a vote and have it count toward an election.
Go get yourself arrested and try it.
IMHO - If you won't even come clean with your identity - don't expect your defense (or your vote) to carry much weight.
Cut food.
Insert in mouth.
Move Teeth Up and Down.
Let slide down throat hole.
Don't be dense.