It's Official....so you Paulbots..What happened?

ok let's share some quotes..

first from some old coach..

"I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it'

teri a ron paul supporter:
“Obama is going to be re-elected no matter what, he has already rigged the votes, and if he hadn't than by voting for Romney would judst be electing a white Obama.”

from a guy let's call him 'Jerry-Coe'

When challenged to PROVE that Romney is just as bad as obama

“Proof that he's elitist and attends Bilderburg meetings? Proof that he's Big Government and is campaigning exactly like Obama did 4 years ago and Kerry in 2004--spouting change, but not defining any of his objections or what he plans to do? That he has a war chest as big as Obama's and a lot of it funded by the same people who funded Obama's election in 2008? Flip flops on every issue and carefully speaks his argument without saying anything or landing definitively on any issue in debates? You can go to infowars.com or wearechange.com if you want real news, or you can live in a world where you are voting for a carbon copy of the current administration.”

From another Paulpuke..
Remember back when everyone voted for McCain to beat Obama? How did that work out for y'all? It DOES NOT WORK! It's a two party system with a one party leader. That's why we need to get Ron Paul in!

Vote for Mitt, get more of the same $#it! Vote for Obama, get disowned by your mama! Vote for Paul, he will free us all!

Hitler had a track record for invading countries over and over, and Germany was an economic and military powerhouse. (They ultimately would have consumed themselves though, because fascism doesn't work in the long run; they relied on endless expansion and subjugation to keep their economy going, and you can't expand forever.) Iran hasn't started a war in hundreds of years, and they're a backwater third world country without a respectable military presence. They probably want a nuclear weapon, but actually detonating it - or giving it to a terrorist to detonate - would allow them to destroy a city, only to be utterly annihilated within a day. Ahmadinejad's not a good guy, but he's not totally suicidal; they want a bomb to threaten retaliation against continued provocation and invasion by the United States.

"Oh, but why would Iran mistrust us? The US has never done anything to them!" Aside from our government's track record of invading other countries (sound familiar? ;)), Iran has good reason to mistrust us, since our CIA helped overthrow their democratically elected government in 1953 to install the Shah on BP's behalf (yes, British Petroleum), and people are still alive from those days. I can only imagine what YOU would want the US to do if another country did that to us. Compared to what you'd want, they've actually been pretty sporting about it, and they never really made any major move against us even after overthrowing the authoritarian Shah we installed. The Ayatollah called for jihad against us decades ago based on our decadent ways, but that never took off, and the people pretty much unanimously ignored him...until our continued military presence on the Arabian peninsula, our bombings, and our CIA cloak and dagger operations gave Osama bin Laden stronger arguments for convincing angry young men to join his cause (after which point they were pretty much brainwashed to become true believers, like the Ayatollah would have wanted). That's the same Osama bin Laden, by the way, who our CIA armed and trained during Operation Cyclone, when we deliberately radicalized Muslims in the region to fight against the atheist Soviets on religious grounds. Radical fundamentalist Islam has not always been in vogue over there: The power elite in charge of US foreign policy made it happen, and wasn't it such a great idea? Maybe we should continue listening to those dumbasses, because they sure seem to have a lot of foresight that benefits us. ;)

Anyway, the real reason our foreign policy "geniuses" consider them a threat actually has nothing to do with terrorism, let alone an actual military threat: It has to do with them accepting currencies other than dollars for oil. If the OPEC countries follow suit, the petrodollar system will collapse, the dollar will hyperinflate, we will not be able to print money for oil, we will have no goods to trade for oil, and so we will have no oil to fuel our agriculture or ship our food across the country...and then people would starve until the supply chain fixed iself, and we'd be a third world country overnight.


So, TL;DR version: You've got to be kidding me. Please say you're kidding me, and you're just trolling, because if neoconservatives are really getting deranged enough to make serious comparisons between Iran and Nazi Germany, I'm going to have to start throwing feces and whack people with sticks and otherwise dumb things down to toddler level just to speak in terms you guys can understand.