to put it lightly. Anyone who harms a child shouldn't ever see the light of day again.It appears another homosexual pedophile, Jerry Sandusky, won't be trolling the streets to abuse children any longer. Thank you GOD!!
The Govenor
2012/06/23 13:32:53
BELLEFONTE, Pa. – Juror No. 4, the foreman, gray-haired and middle-aged, stood high in the back row of the jurors' box, looked down at some sheets of paper, then at Jerry Sandusky and began to deliver a verdict a long, sad time coming.
Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.
Of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. Of indecent assault. Of endangering the welfare of children.
Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.
Of terrorizing the poorest and most vulnerable of this area's youth. Of abusing his fame as a former Penn State defensive coordinator. Of conducting a charade of charitable work to supposedly help children.
Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.
Forty-five times it rang out. Juror No. 4 hammered each one home with the independent force each one deserved.






















It has nothing to do with gender, gay or straight. It has to do with an attraction to a certain age and opportunity.
I'll go ahead and post some scientific facts/studies, but I doubt it'll sink in because, well, people like you hate admitting being wrong.
http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/facts...
"A random sample of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children was screened with reference to their adult sexual orientation and the sex of their victims. The sample divided fairly evenly into two groups based on whether they were sexually fixated exclusively on children or had regressed from peer relationships. Female children were victimized nearly twice as often as male children. All regressed offenders, whether their victims were male or female children, were heterosexual in their adult orientation. There were no examples of regression to child victims among peer-oriented, homosexual males. The possibility emerges that homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia may be mutually exclusive and that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the ...
It has nothing to do with gender, gay or straight. It has to do with an attraction to a certain age and opportunity.
I'll go ahead and post some scientific facts/studies, but I doubt it'll sink in because, well, people like you hate admitting being wrong.
http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/facts...
"A random sample of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children was screened with reference to their adult sexual orientation and the sex of their victims. The sample divided fairly evenly into two groups based on whether they were sexually fixated exclusively on children or had regressed from peer relationships. Female children were victimized nearly twice as often as male children. All regressed offenders, whether their victims were male or female children, were heterosexual in their adult orientation. There were no examples of regression to child victims among peer-oriented, homosexual males. The possibility emerges that homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia may be mutually exclusive and that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male."
Abstract from the US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Also, men of science disagree with you.
"In a review of published studies comparing homosexual and heterosexual samples on psychological tests, Gonsiorek (1982) found that, although some differences have been observed in test results between homosexuals and heterosexuals, both groups consistently score within the normal range. Gonsiorek concluded that "Homosexuality in and of itself is unrelated to psychological disturbance or maladjustment. Homosexuals as a group are not more psychologically disturbed on account of their homosexuality."
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu...
You lack the power of conversation but not the power of speech. That's for sure.
I would hope that it is bubba the boody bandit but he is too old!
too good for him