They are extreme and they are insensitive but they are presenting a viewpoint that has some validity. Many devout Christians are feeling angst and alienation from a society which not only rejects their values but also rejects them as people. See this book::
Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity
by David Limbaugh
http://books.google.com/books...
"In Persecution you'll enter the hotly contested battle for the soul of our public schools. Here are appalling - but true - stories of how anti-Christian social engineers not only prohibit school prayer and forbid students from wearing Christian symbols, like a simple cross, but even expunge the real story of Christianity in America from history textbooks. Worse still, in the name of "diversity," "tolerance," "multiculturalism," and "sex education," the social engineers actively inculcate hatred of Christianity as ignorant, repressive, and offensive. Not exactly the agenda of most parents whose tax dollars support the public schools." "Looking honestly at the dominant influence of Christianity in America's colonial culture and schools, where the Bible was routinely used as a textbook, Limbaugh makes a compelling case that the education students receive today is not what the Founders would have endorsed. Inde...
Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity
by David Limbaugh
http://books.google.com/books...
"In Persecution you'll enter the hotly contested battle for the soul of our public schools. Here are appalling - but true - stories of how anti-Christian social engineers not only prohibit school prayer and forbid students from wearing Christian symbols, like a simple cross, but even expunge the real story of Christianity in America from history textbooks. Worse still, in the name of "diversity," "tolerance," "multiculturalism," and "sex education," the social engineers actively inculcate hatred of Christianity as ignorant, repressive, and offensive. Not exactly the agenda of most parents whose tax dollars support the public schools." "Looking honestly at the dominant influence of Christianity in America's colonial culture and schools, where the Bible was routinely used as a textbook, Limbaugh makes a compelling case that the education students receive today is not what the Founders would have endorsed. Inde...
They are extreme and they are insensitive but they are presenting a viewpoint that has some validity. Many devout Christians are feeling angst and alienation from a society which not only rejects their values but also rejects them as people. See this book::
Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity
by David Limbaugh
http://books.google.com/books...
"In Persecution you'll enter the hotly contested battle for the soul of our public schools. Here are appalling - but true - stories of how anti-Christian social engineers not only prohibit school prayer and forbid students from wearing Christian symbols, like a simple cross, but even expunge the real story of Christianity in America from history textbooks. Worse still, in the name of "diversity," "tolerance," "multiculturalism," and "sex education," the social engineers actively inculcate hatred of Christianity as ignorant, repressive, and offensive. Not exactly the agenda of most parents whose tax dollars support the public schools." "Looking honestly at the dominant influence of Christianity in America's colonial culture and schools, where the Bible was routinely used as a textbook, Limbaugh makes a compelling case that the education students receive today is not what the Founders would have endorsed. Indeed, they would have been outraged at what is taught - and what the courts say - in their name, under the pretext of the non-constitutional and woefully misunderstood phrase "separation of church and state.""--BOOK JACKET.
(more)Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity
by David Limbaugh
http://books.google.com/books...
"In Persecution you'll enter the hotly contested battle for the soul of our public schools. Here are appalling - but true - stories of how anti-Christian social engineers not only prohibit school prayer and forbid students from wearing Christian symbols, like a simple cross, but even expunge the real story of Christianity in America from history textbooks. Worse still, in the name of "diversity," "tolerance," "multiculturalism," and "sex education," the social engineers actively inculcate hatred of Christianity as ignorant, repressive, and offensive. Not exactly the agenda of most parents whose tax dollars support the public schools." "Looking honestly at the dominant influence of Christianity in America's colonial culture and schools, where the Bible was routinely used as a textbook, Limbaugh makes a compelling case that the education students receive today is not what the Founders would have endorsed. Indeed, they would have been outraged at what is taught - and what the courts say - in their name, under the pretext of the non-constitutional and woefully misunderstood phrase "separation of church and state.""--BOOK JACKET.
You would think Christians would be horrified by the way these people represent them. This is not going to win anyone over to religion if they were on the fence.
I mean, they may not fit the definition of hate group because they have not physically harmed anyone to our knowledge but at the same time, they proselatize hate, so they are a group that ...hates.
They are free to believe in whatever stupidity they like but they need to keep it within the walls of their "church." When they start picketing funerals and messing in the lives of normal people is when they cross the line.
The size of [a] lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies but would be ashamed to tell big ones.
Something therefore always remains and sticks from the most impudent lies, a fact which all bodies and individuals concerned with the art of lying in this world know only too well, and hence they stop at nothing to achieve this end.
Propaganda must not serve the truth, especially not insofar as it might bring out something favorable for the oppo- nent.
Through clever and constant applica- tion of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.
Have you seen the $hit these hate mongers spew?
Awe... that was a rhetorical bait question wasn't it, you bad (but good)
Hate and kill infidels, take slaves, hate homosexuals, steal other peoples land under instruction from an imaginary divinity..... hmm..... does any of this sound familiar?
Who do you thinks winning?
.
Kirk and Pill say it is essential to undermine the moral authority of churches who oppose homo- sexuality by "muddying the moral waters." The objective is to get liberal churches to openly support homosexuality, while portraying conser- vative churches as "homophobic" and "badly out of step with the times and with the latest find-
ings of psychology."
The authors caution against letting the American public be exposed to the truth about homosexual deviant behavior. "In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by prema- ture exposure to homosexual behavior itself. In- stead,
...the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible.
cultural change in America are taken from Hit- ler's writings and propaganda warfare manuals.
Eric M. Pollard, a founder of ACT UP/D.C., says that ACT UP's philosophy was built upon the writings of Hitler in Mein Kampf. Pollard admitted this in an unusually candid article in the Washington Blade on January 31, 1991.
According to Pollard, "I have helped to create a truly fascist organization." Pollard says
"We conspired to bring into existence an activist group that ... could effectively exploit the me- dia for its own ends, and that would work cov- ertly and break the law with impunity... Under the influence of powerful, illicit drugs [LSD], it really seemed like a good idea." [2]
Pollard admits that ACT UP/DC believed it should use deliberately subversive tactics, "... drawn largely from the voluminous Mein Kampf, which some of us studied as a working model. As ACT UP/DC grew, we struck in- tently and surgically into whatever institutions we believed to stand in our way."
Mitchell then talked about a website www.wiredstrategies.com/Hitler which compares religious people to Hitler and the Nazis. The website contains headlines such as:
"Nazi Anti-Jewish Speech vs. Religious Right Anti-Gay Speech: Are They Similar?" The site shows a side-by-side comparison of Nazi propaganda against Jews during WWII with the "Christian anti-gay movement" of today saying:
"...are fundamentalist Christians using anti-gay arguments that echo back to the Nazi era?" This page compares quotes from The Eternal Jew with Christian conservatives’ modern-day quotes about gay Americans.
Mitchell spoke of religious people, hatred, homophobia, religion and the religious wrong as though each word were synonymous, interchanging religion and the Religious Wrong with Hitler, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and even the murder of Matthew Sheppard.
If only Christendom had more of them.
There is a huge difference between being a Christian, and being a member of Christiandom. Those Roman Catholic priests and bishops who buggered little boys are not Christians. This list could be miles long with false Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc.
Regards,
Troy.
tually morally superior to het- erosexuals. Kirk and Pill urge the use of celebrity en- dorsements and a listing of fa- mous homo- sexuals in his- tory to show that homosexu- als are actually superior in many ways to he terosexuals. "In no time, ... a skillful and
clever media campaign could have the gay community looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization."
do you also mean permisson to child sex?
The homosexual magazine Guide published a pro-pedophile editorial in its July, 1995 issue. In referring to pedophiles as “prophets” of sexual freedom, the Guide editorialist wrote: “We must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality. . . . Surrounded by pious moralists with deadening anti-sexual rules, we must be shameless rulebreakers, demonstrating our allegiance to a higher concept of love. We must do it for the children’s sake.
We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual, that they deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. … We cannot, however, always be proud of the way we as a community have treated our prophets. … [W]e must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality
The problem with this argument is that there are at least ten times more heterosexuals than homosexuals and propotionally the same amont per capita of peadophiles in each group. Nessisarily then, there are ten times more peadophiles in the straight community as the gay.
The rest of the gay and straight population are equally revolted by the practice. Considering that it is a favoured practice of the religious and the Church, I don't think religionists are in any position to condemn anybody!
A homosexual activist, writing under the pen name of Michael Swift, looked to the day when homosexuals would control our culture. He challenged heterosexual society with these words:
We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of
your feeble masculinity, of your shallow
dreams and vulgar lies. … Your sons shall
become our minions to do our bidding.
They will be recast in our image. They will
come to crave and adore us.
All churches who condemn us will be
closed. Our holy gods are handsome young
men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral
and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar
and banal will be annihilated. Since we are
alienated from middle-class heterosexual
conventions, we are free to live our lives
according to the dictates of the pure imagination.
For us, too much is not enough.
Too much is not enough.
It seems all religions have histories that aren't worthy representation to their belief in God.
debrarae voted Yes
Interesting to know that this is yet another hate group filled with REGISTERED DEMOCRATS! http://www.sodahead.com/unite... http://www.democraticundergro... http://www.mediaite.com/onlin... http://www.thenewstribune.com... http://www.conservapedia.com/...
+2 raves Reply