Quantcast

Is the use of common sense being thrown out the window to be replaced by sourcing.

Adam 2012/05/03 19:46:46
Related Topics: Internet, Moved, Finger, Logic
You!
Add Photos & Videos
It seems that in a day in age in which communication has become available instantly and through the internet the ability to obtain all kinds of knowledge at the tip of your fingers that common sense is being thrown out the window and being replaced by sourcing your opinion. Let me tell you what I mean. There is much knowledge that is common sense are easy to argue without the need to retrieve someone else's opinion. One could also make logical arguments without needing a source also, if the connections to the logic were easily made. But currently one cannot have an opinion without a source. If you have an opinion and make your argument you must source it. Even if you mention something that is well known you must source it. Without sourcing it your argument loses credibility. So now we have moved to a day where siting a source whether the source is right or wrong is more important than ones ability to think.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/05/03 20:11:42
    Yes!
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +4
    When someone asks you to source something that is already well known, they are just playing games with you. This type of behavior is outlined in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' which is a Prog/Lib handbook for douchbaggery tricks.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ScottyG - Faqueue 2012/05/04 16:35:31
    Yes!
    ScottyG - Faqueue
    It's really hard to do factual sourcing when the sources are the MSM who's only opinion is it's own biased reporting.

    The MSM loves to omit facts and replace it with owner bias and uses selective editing to make the slant their own truth.
  • Bob DiN 2012/05/04 06:22:29
    Yes!
    Bob DiN
    I must be going somewhere, there is not much left in America
  • goatman112003 2012/05/03 20:50:00
    Yes!
    goatman112003
    +2
    Most of the time the request comes opposing viewpoint mainly to bust chops. Its like prove Grant is buried at Grant's tomb and I want the latest forensics not witness or government statements.
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/05/03 20:48:15
    Yes!
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +3
    Worse than that, debate has degenerated into a sourcing war. "My source is better than your source!" Balderdash and fustian. Common or "natural" sense still prevails.
  • Steverno~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/05/03 20:36:43
    Yes!
    Steverno~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    I had several occasions where I been requested to provide proof (sources) for comments made on this website.These request for facts from other SH members may be an attempt to prove I don't know what I'm writing about.But I'm very good at finding supportive info & videos to make my factual points!
  • Adam Stevern... 2012/05/03 20:47:41
    Adam
    my point was for points that really don't need siting. We have moved into a society where people no longer think for themselves. Instead we must go look everything up and depend on others thoughts.
  • CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/05/03 20:11:42
    Yes!
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +4
    When someone asks you to source something that is already well known, they are just playing games with you. This type of behavior is outlined in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' which is a Prog/Lib handbook for douchbaggery tricks.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/18 15:58:20

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals