There's no room in logical and fair debate for namecalling--in my opinion. So, I disapprove of the use of the terms "fascist," "Sheeple," and "Crimes." However, I do support your idea that the action of the New York Times indicates that the Times publishes unfair and unbalanced political opinions and articles (in an attempt, I might add, to sway the public mind).

Senator McCain's article was an excellent article on his Iraq stance, and should have been published. It would have shown up Obama's lack of knowledge and experience, and this is probably the main reason it was not published. The excuse the Times gave for not printing it was lame, to say the least.