Left-wing activism masquerading as "SodaHead Politics"?
I doubt very much the author lives in Nevada.
I do.
Most Nevadans want to dump Harry Reid and Sharron Angle is the woman to do it.
I am sorry if dumping Harry Reid gets in the way of the left-wing road map to power.
Is Sharron Angle on a Mission From God?
SodaHead Politics
2010/08/20 23:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
100 votes
|
|
47% | |||
|
115 votes
|
|
53% | |||
Sharron Angle, the Nevada Republican Senate candidate who is running against Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, has been public about how her faith has guided her political platform.
From her anti-abortion stance to saying God wanted her to run for Senate and she's fighting those who "want to make government our god," Angle has more than once shown her skepticism over the separation of Church and State. But this, apparently, is not new.
Nearly 20 years ago, according to a newspaper editor, Angle was part of a group that was opposed to a local high school football team using black jerseys. The coach, who wanted to inspire his players, wanted to use the new color so that his players would remember a previous loss, the "blackest day" in the team's history.
But Angle, among others, said that the color "was thoroughly evil, invoking the supernatural and especially the devil." Angle and her posse went on to quote scripture on why the players shouldn't wear the jerseys. She later won a school trustee election.
Nevadans don't seem to mind the mingling of religion and campaigning. Angle is in a dead heat with Reid.
Is Sharron Angle on a Mission From God?
From her anti-abortion stance to saying God wanted her to run for Senate and she's fighting those who "want to make government our god," Angle has more than once shown her skepticism over the separation of Church and State. But this, apparently, is not new.
Nearly 20 years ago, according to a newspaper editor, Angle was part of a group that was opposed to a local high school football team using black jerseys. The coach, who wanted to inspire his players, wanted to use the new color so that his players would remember a previous loss, the "blackest day" in the team's history.
But Angle, among others, said that the color "was thoroughly evil, invoking the supernatural and especially the devil." Angle and her posse went on to quote scripture on why the players shouldn't wear the jerseys. She later won a school trustee election.
Nevadans don't seem to mind the mingling of religion and campaigning. Angle is in a dead heat with Reid.
Is Sharron Angle on a Mission From God?
Read More: http://pvtimes.com/opinion/angle-strove-religiousl...
Top Opinion
-
Heisenberg 2010/08/21 20:54:45Yes, Angle has God on her side for sure






















Lokk at campaignforliberty.com Not one of those idiots you mentioned (add in Newt) are supported by the REAL Tea Party.
That is how the GOP are attacking us, when we showed a threat, they decided to make a Tea Party "Express" tour, and you have bought into it as many others have,
That is whyu we can never have true change, the ones in power control the media to slander others w/o any retribution
Tea Party people are Libertarians who have a Christian faith but many are fed up with fiscal irresponsibility so that is our main objective, not religion
Paladino is a FALSE Tea Party guy
Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President, but few people would call Lincoln a conservative. So how did his party--the GOP--become the party supported by big business, the religious right, and conservatives of all stripes
The Republican Party started in 1854. It was a one-issue party, and that issue was anti-slavery.
Well, to be brutally specific, the issue was the spread of slavery. The infant party knew it couldn't do anything to stop slavery in the South, so its goal was to stop slavery from spreading any further. To new territories in the Midwest, for example.
The two standard parties before that point were the Democrats and the Whigs-but the Whig party was dead or dying. The Democrats were proslavery back then. Immigrants and Catholics were usually Democrats too.
Then as now, a large part of the voting public was anti-immigrant. No matter how they felt about slavery, these people hated Democrats and were likely to join the Republicans. In the first Presidential election after the Republican Party was formed, the party did surprisingly well--in the North. In the slave-holding South, of course, no one voted Republican.
By the ne...
Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President, but few people would call Lincoln a conservative. So how did his party--the GOP--become the party supported by big business, the religious right, and conservatives of all stripes
The Republican Party started in 1854. It was a one-issue party, and that issue was anti-slavery.
Well, to be brutally specific, the issue was the spread of slavery. The infant party knew it couldn't do anything to stop slavery in the South, so its goal was to stop slavery from spreading any further. To new territories in the Midwest, for example.
The two standard parties before that point were the Democrats and the Whigs-but the Whig party was dead or dying. The Democrats were proslavery back then. Immigrants and Catholics were usually Democrats too.
Then as now, a large part of the voting public was anti-immigrant. No matter how they felt about slavery, these people hated Democrats and were likely to join the Republicans. In the first Presidential election after the Republican Party was formed, the party did surprisingly well--in the North. In the slave-holding South, of course, no one voted Republican.
By the next presidential campaign in 1860, when Lincoln captured the majority of electoral votes, horrible, violent events propelled North against South, free states against slave states. There was the Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court, which forced free states to recognize the rights of slaveholders. The bloody raid at Harpers Ferry, corruption in the White House, a fatal attack in the Senate between two congressmen, warfare in Kansas over slavery. . . all these set the stage for the Civil War.
So the war was fought from 1860 to 1865, and slavery ended. Where did that leave the Republicans? Their one, unifying issue was gone.
Even in 1860, many men joined the Republicans because they were concerned about their jobs if slavery was allowed to spread. As the Civil War rolled on, the Republicans worked with industry in the North to increase manufacturing. More railroads were built to supply the war effort, and banks were reformed. During the war, if laborers went on strike, the Union army stepped in to end the strike.
A relationship was begun.
After the war, the Republican Congress pushed for railway construction in the South. That didn't score too many points with former slaveholders, however. Most white men of the South remained Democrats; most freed slaves gravitated to the Republican Party.
But black men didn't vote in numbers large enough to have much influence.
People change. Ten years after the war, voters wanted to put the conflict behind them. The Republican Party fought to survive, and most Republicans realized that protecting the interests of minorities was no longer a popular concern. The courts chiseled away at the reforms that were passed right after the Civil War, including voting rights for African Americans. No one did anything; it seems that no one in power really cared.
The Republicans focused on economic issues. This had been their source of strength during the Civil War, and it kept winning elections. Over those first twenty years of its existance, from 1854 to 1874, the Party morphed into the conservative entity we know today, protective of business interests, but with no direct religious goals.
"A June 9, 2010, Rasmussen Reports post-primary poll showed Angle leading incumbent Senator Harry Reid by a margin of 50% to 39%. A July 2010 poll however showed Senator Reid leading Angle by 7 points. The change of margin, 18% in less than a month, is the largest in Senate elections history."
"Angle has been criticized for largely avoiding answering questions from the local press."
That's not surprising, since whenever she opens her mouth she sounds like a Tea Party extremist. This does a disservice to the Tea Party, which would like the American public to think that its character and agenda are reasonable and practical instead of promoting a weird, ultra-right, Christian-doctrine based radical extremist agenda.
Provide the source of your information please.
Regardless, it is an interesting race.
She is up by 2---and if you knew anything about polling--you know LV is more accurate than RV and adding leaners is usually more reliable closer to an election. So again-for at least this one week--she is up by 2....NO ONE WAS BEING DECEPTIVE. Learn how to read polls before you try to analyze them....
(and take a class in survey research while you are over there)
Oh-and got a little present for ya before you head back over there-speaking of polls-see if you can figure this one out-----
http://politicalwire.com/arch...
So-- Got any gays in your family? Is this global warming thing affecting your area any worse than it's affecting ours? I have to admit it's been kind of a tough summer here.
And that makes me question conservatives as a whole. Just how much does religion (specifically, Christian and Mormon religion) figure into being a conservative?
Conservatives like to say that they are about "the Constitution, smaller government and lower taxes," but that only seems to mask an agenda that is actually religion based, or bundles so many religious points of agenda with the more classical ideals that religion becomes a liability to conservatives in general, depending entirely on appealing to a core of religiously devout people, a core that is dwindling and fracturing over time as church pews empty and young people turn away from religion (for good reason, in my opinion).
In my view, the very thing that conservatives have catered to for support in the past (religion, especially Christian religion) is now stabbing them in the back as the more devout religious people are splintering off into more extremist or hard-line groups such as the Tea Party, leaving rational, reasonable, more secular than religious conservatives in their own group.
It's very interesting to me what is happening among conservatives today, so I like to try to pick up bits of information about it from conservatives themselves when and however I can.
Also, there is another one posted that you might enjoy as an obamanista. It's about obama vs. Bush in some democrat districts-conducted by a dem. pollster. So find both of them-they have been posted. But don't demand that I post something. That is really rude...
WTF?! i HOPE this woman has opened her mind since then!!
Why she would want to do that for prisoners of another state is Angle's warped mind at work. Thank goodness Navada has other choices to vote for this year.
http://www.politifact.com/tru...
Here's another link that explains it.
http://dullardmush.blogspot.c...
You should probably do your homework a little more carefully before you spread propaganda. "In a time" was 2003, but you kinda forgot to mention that.
If you don't like her, that's fine, but don't use half truths to convince others.