Is Sarah Palin’s 2012 Run Already Done For?
Gil Kaufman
January 01, 2011 12:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
286 votes
|
|
20% | |||
|
1,126 votes
|
|
80% | |||
You can already imagine that former half-term Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s polling numbers are way, way down among hunters, outdoor enthusiasts, animal lovers and fisherman in light of the unflattering portrayal of her outdoor skills on her TLC reality show.
But a daunting new set of figures about Palin’s popularity among her own Republican cohorts could spell some serious trouble for an all-but-certain 2012 presidential bid.
According to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll 49 percent of Republicans said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support a presidential bid by Palin. And while that sounds pretty good, the Real Clear Politics blog pointed out that the figure is a massive drop off from the 67 percent of Republicans who said they were likely to support a Palin run when asked the same question in a December 2008 poll.
What a difference two years makes, huh?
Keep in mind, despite the debacle of the Katie Couric interview, the Bristol pregnancy revelation, ShoppingGate and other flare ups on the campaign trail, at that time in 2008 the GOP was still basking in the glow of the enthusiasm Palin stirred up in its members. It helped that they were equally disillusioned by candidate John McCain’s lackluster showing on election night.
You’d think that in the ensuring years, what with the two best-selling books, a handful of successful endorsements in the 2010 midterms (amid some typically boneheaded ones like Christine O’Donnell) and her high profile gig on GOP mouthpiece Fox News that Palin’s popularity among her party faithful would be much higher.
Instead, potential rival, fellow Fox News contributor and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee got the support of 67 percent of voters in the new poll when asked who they were somewhat or very likely to support, while 59 percent said the same about former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.
Like her multiple attempts to shoot a caribou on "Sarah Palin's Alaska," Palin isn’t just firing blanks in one survey. Hell, according to the Democrat-affiliated Public Policy Polling organization, Palin’s not even putting up
numbers in her native Alaska, with 58 percent giving her an unfavorable
rating to a 33 percent favorable vote. Worth nothing, her favorable
percentage is around the 35 percent of the vote that her handpicked
Alaska Senate candidate, Joe Miller, pulled in during his failed bid in
November.
It’s early in the game still and Palin is nothing if not an avid supporter of the scrappy underdog, but as her potential rivals make the rounds of key states, Palin is starting out in the hole. A recent profile in the Sunday New York Times Magazine painted a picture of a political machine that is dictatorially run from the top down, with Palin calling all the shots in a small organization of operatives who’ve mostly been with her for a short time and, as is the case with her chief blogger, have no relevant professional political experience.
Between the hypocrisy of clubbing fish and shooting animals to “provide” for her family (when we assume there's a grocery store down the street from her lakeside mansion) and shrill fights with the First Lady over the rights of overweight school children to eat cookies, whatever political machine Palin is building doesn’t appear to conform to anything we’ve seen before.
I’ve frequently asked whether Palin is a politician or an entertainer and from the sounds of it, her party’s members have made that decision for her. They love lining up to get her signature and one of her patented winky smiles. But, gosh darn it, they just don’t seem that interested in voting for her, now do they!
How’s that alienating your base working out for ya?
But a daunting new set of figures about Palin’s popularity among her own Republican cohorts could spell some serious trouble for an all-but-certain 2012 presidential bid.
According to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll 49 percent of Republicans said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support a presidential bid by Palin. And while that sounds pretty good, the Real Clear Politics blog pointed out that the figure is a massive drop off from the 67 percent of Republicans who said they were likely to support a Palin run when asked the same question in a December 2008 poll.
What a difference two years makes, huh?
Keep in mind, despite the debacle of the Katie Couric interview, the Bristol pregnancy revelation, ShoppingGate and other flare ups on the campaign trail, at that time in 2008 the GOP was still basking in the glow of the enthusiasm Palin stirred up in its members. It helped that they were equally disillusioned by candidate John McCain’s lackluster showing on election night.
You’d think that in the ensuring years, what with the two best-selling books, a handful of successful endorsements in the 2010 midterms (amid some typically boneheaded ones like Christine O’Donnell) and her high profile gig on GOP mouthpiece Fox News that Palin’s popularity among her party faithful would be much higher.
Instead, potential rival, fellow Fox News contributor and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee got the support of 67 percent of voters in the new poll when asked who they were somewhat or very likely to support, while 59 percent said the same about former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.
Like her multiple attempts to shoot a caribou on "Sarah Palin's Alaska," Palin isn’t just firing blanks in one survey. Hell, according to the Democrat-affiliated Public Policy Polling organization, Palin’s not even putting up
numbers in her native Alaska, with 58 percent giving her an unfavorable
rating to a 33 percent favorable vote. Worth nothing, her favorable
percentage is around the 35 percent of the vote that her handpicked
Alaska Senate candidate, Joe Miller, pulled in during his failed bid in
November.
It’s early in the game still and Palin is nothing if not an avid supporter of the scrappy underdog, but as her potential rivals make the rounds of key states, Palin is starting out in the hole. A recent profile in the Sunday New York Times Magazine painted a picture of a political machine that is dictatorially run from the top down, with Palin calling all the shots in a small organization of operatives who’ve mostly been with her for a short time and, as is the case with her chief blogger, have no relevant professional political experience.
Between the hypocrisy of clubbing fish and shooting animals to “provide” for her family (when we assume there's a grocery store down the street from her lakeside mansion) and shrill fights with the First Lady over the rights of overweight school children to eat cookies, whatever political machine Palin is building doesn’t appear to conform to anything we’ve seen before.
I’ve frequently asked whether Palin is a politician or an entertainer and from the sounds of it, her party’s members have made that decision for her. They love lining up to get her signature and one of her patented winky smiles. But, gosh darn it, they just don’t seem that interested in voting for her, now do they!
How’s that alienating your base working out for ya?
More polls by Gil Kaufman
Top Opinion
See Votes by State
Loading map...
News & Politics
May 25, 2012 19:19:55
Hot Questions on SodaHead
-
Who's the Hottest Male Actor Over 50?
-
What Was the Best Season Finale?
-
Who's the Meanest Reality TV Judge?
- View more slideshows »









But, gosh darn it, your poll and this polls numbers don't look the same.
Wait a minute...where have I heard that phrase before?
But we're supposed to pretend we don't know this, and that SH is unbiased. .
Ok.
Do you have any numbers to back that up?
Something besides FOx, or Drudge, or Rasmussen?
Moderate ones?
Yes, Sodahead is overwhelmingly right wing.
Where's your polls?
If you'd read the article- that is what this poll is about- her dismal approval rating.
I disagree.
Actually, you interjected into a conversation that had nothing to do with Palin,
The people on this poll voted 81% favorably for Palin.
If,as you say,
" I believe the people of the U.S. are the same as this blog."
What other conclusion should I draw?
I was trying to make sense out of it- but if you don't even understand the point you were making, how can I?
Is Sarah Palin’s 2012 Run Already Done For?
No where does it say anything about SUPPORTING Palin. You could have tons of people that hate Palin say her run is not done. As far as "I believe the people of the U.S. are the same as this blog", I stand by that because these people at SH are also people of the U.S. Will other polls outside of SH be the exact same? I have no idea, but I'd gander to say that if you read the question the way it is written, the outside poll number would be higher.
It says in the first few paragraphs-
But nothing you've said STILL as anything to do with my comment- which you answered off topic.
Next time, read the article- and operate on a full understanding of the discussion.
"No where does it say anything about SUPPORTING Palin"
Yes, it does, the entire discussion is built on it.
You can already imagine that former half-term Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s polling numbers are way, way down among hunters, outdoor enthusiasts, animal lovers and fisherman in light of the unflattering portrayal of her outdoor skills on her TLC reality show.
But a daunting new set of figures about Palin’s popularity among her own Republican cohorts could spell some serious trouble for an all-but-certain 2012 presidential bid.
According to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll 49 percent of Republicans said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to support a presidential bid by Palin. And while that sounds pretty good, the Real Clear Politics blog pointed out that the figure is a massive drop off from the 67 percent of Republicans who said they were likely to support a Palin run when asked the same question in a December 2008 poll.
approval rating in Alaska- 33%
Among Republicans- 49%
Americans- around 20%.
Next time, please just read the articles. They're there for a reason.
I didn't say anything- that is the article- which, if you'd read it- you wouldn't attribute to me.
Obama is not mentioned- ok- that's enough for me.
And I'm a beautiful woman and I'm not an airhead, nor think of it.
I don't like her values, and I think her ethics are skewed.
I don't think she is dumb, she has a very polished cunning- but I do think she is intellectually lazy.
She doesn't put in the homework- she should have been using this time to study instead of selling books and reality shows.
After this tragedy in AZ- and her past history of provoking,
I think she is tarnished and the middle will reject her out of hand now.
She can't make it in radio, and radio has already rejected her- but she may find a niche in tv - which to be honest- I predicted more than 2 years ago.
I'm sorry, I've seen too much ugliness in her- inside ugliness- bully behavior, you are welcome to her.
She's too rigid and extreme for me.
I do find her behavior very bullying, I remember when she whipped the crowd into a frenzy at a stump speech regarding Obama- when the mob screamed in response to her reference to him, TRAITOR!
TREASON! And most notably, and chilling of all, KILL HIM!!
She did not challenge them, did not call for reason nor distance herself from that outburst.
She doesn't bring out the best in most- and excludes instead of includes.
That's not the America I want., nor do most people.
I understand she dovetails with your values-
but I don't want a leader who excludes- and even if their values mirror my own- if they attempt to dehumanize others not the same- I would not want them either.
But thanks.
You say you don't want someone who excludes. How many times has Obama done just that?
Hey, you have to stick up for what you believe in and she believes in strong principles and so do the majority of Americans whether you believe it or not.
Palin hasn't been over 29% approval rating for at least 6 months.